linux-toradex.git, branch v3.10.76

Linux 3.10.76

2015-04-29T08:34:22+00:00

dcache: Fix locking bugs in backported "deal with deadlock in d_walk()"

2015-04-29T08:34:02+00:00

commit 20defcec264ceab2630356fb9d397f3d237b5e6d upstream in 3.2-stable

Steven Rostedt reported:
> Porting -rt to the latest 3.2 stable tree I triggered this bug:
>
> =====================================
> [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> -------------------------------------
> rm/1638 is trying to release lock (rcu_read_lock) at:
> [] rcu_read_unlock+0x0/0x23
> but there are no more locks to release!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 2 locks held by rm/1638:
>  #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9/1){+.+.+.}, at: [] do_rmdir+0x5f/0xd2
>  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.+.}, at: [] vfs_rmdir+0x49/0xac
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 1638, comm: rm Not tainted 3.2.66-test-rt96+ #2
> Call Trace:
>  [] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f
>  [] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xc3/0xcd
>  [] lock_release_non_nested+0x98/0x1ec
>  [] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x18/0x90
>  [] ? local_clock+0x2d/0x50
>  [] ? d_hash+0x2f/0x2f
>  [] ? d_hash+0x2f/0x2f
>  [] lock_release+0x192/0x1ad
>  [] rcu_read_unlock+0x17/0x23
>  [] shrink_dcache_parent+0x227/0x270
>  [] vfs_rmdir+0x68/0xac
>  [] do_rmdir+0x98/0xd2
>  [] ? fput+0x1a3/0x1ab
>  [] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x1a
>  [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x118/0x149
>  [] sys_unlinkat+0x2b/0x35
>  [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x12
>
>
>
>
> There's a path to calling rcu_read_unlock() without calling
> rcu_read_lock() in have_submounts().
>
> 	goto positive;
>
> positive:
> 	if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
> 		goto rename_retry;
>
> rename_retry:
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
>
> in the above path, rcu_read_lock() is never done before calling
> rcu_read_unlock();

I reviewed locking contexts in all three functions that I changed when
backporting "deal with deadlock in d_walk()".  It's actually worse
than this:

- We don't hold this_parent->d_lock at the 'positive' label in
  have_submounts(), but it is unlocked after 'rename_retry'.
- There is an rcu_read_unlock() after the 'out' label in
  select_parent(), but it's not held at the 'goto out'.

Fix all three lock imbalances.

Reported-by: Steven Rostedt 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arc: mm: Fix build failure

2015-04-29T08:34:01+00:00

commit e262eb9381ad51b5de7a9e762ee773bbd25ce650 upstream.

Fix misspelled define.

Fixes: 33692f27597f ("vm: add VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV handling support")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sb_edac: avoid INTERNAL ERROR message in EDAC with unspecified channel

2015-04-29T08:34:01+00:00

commit 351fc4a99d49fde63fe5ab7412beb35c40d27269 upstream.

Intel IA32 SDM Table 15-14 defines channel 0xf as 'not specified', but
EDAC doesn't know about this and returns and INTERNAL ERROR when the
channel is greater than NUM_CHANNELS:

kernel: [ 1538.886456] CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0 Bank 1: 940000000000009f
kernel: [ 1538.886669] TSC 2bc68b22e7e812 ADDR 46dae7000 MISC 0 PROCESSOR 0:306e4 TIME 1390414572 SOCKET 0 APIC 0
kernel: [ 1538.971948] EDAC MC1: INTERNAL ERROR: channel value is out of range (15 >= 4)
kernel: [ 1538.972203] EDAC MC1: 0 CE memory read error on unknown memory (slot:0 page:0x46dae7 offset:0x0 grain:0 syndrome:0x0 -  area:DRAM err_code:0000:009f socket:1 channel_mask:1 rank:0)

This commit changes sb_edac to forward a channel of -1 to EDAC if the
channel is not specified.  edac_mc_handle_error() sets the channel to -1
internally after the error message anyway, so this commit should have no
effect other than avoiding the INTERNAL ERROR message when the channel
is not specified.

Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings 
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
Cc: Vinson Lee 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86: mm: move mmap_sem unlock from mm_fault_error() to caller

2015-04-29T08:34:01+00:00

commit 7fb08eca45270d0ae86e1ad9d39c40b7a55d0190 upstream.

This replaces four copies in various stages of mm_fault_error() handling
with just a single one.  It will also allow for more natural placement
of the unlocking after some further cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vm: make stack guard page errors return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV rather than SIGBUS

2015-04-29T08:34:01+00:00

commit 9c145c56d0c8a0b62e48c8d71e055ad0fb2012ba upstream.

The stack guard page error case has long incorrectly caused a SIGBUS
rather than a SIGSEGV, but nobody actually noticed until commit
fee7e49d4514 ("mm: propagate error from stack expansion even for guard
page") because that error case was never actually triggered in any
normal situations.

Now that we actually report the error, people noticed the wrong signal
that resulted.  So far, only the test suite of libsigsegv seems to have
actually cared, but there are real applications that use libsigsegv, so
let's not wait for any of those to break.

Reported-and-tested-by: Takashi Iwai 
Tested-by: Jan Engelhardt 
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens  # "s390 still compiles and boots"
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vm: add VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV handling support

2015-04-29T08:34:00+00:00

commit 33692f27597fcab536d7cbbcc8f52905133e4aa7 upstream.

The core VM already knows about VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, but cannot return a
"you should SIGSEGV" error, because the SIGSEGV case was generally
handled by the caller - usually the architecture fault handler.

That results in lots of duplication - all the architecture fault
handlers end up doing very similar "look up vma, check permissions, do
retries etc" - but it generally works.  However, there are cases where
the VM actually wants to SIGSEGV, and applications _expect_ SIGSEGV.

In particular, when accessing the stack guard page, libsigsegv expects a
SIGSEGV.  And it usually got one, because the stack growth is handled by
that duplicated architecture fault handler.

However, when the generic VM layer started propagating the error return
from the stack expansion in commit fee7e49d4514 ("mm: propagate error
from stack expansion even for guard page"), that now exposed the
existing VM_FAULT_SIGBUS result to user space.  And user space really
expected SIGSEGV, not SIGBUS.

To fix that case, we need to add a VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV, and teach all those
duplicate architecture fault handlers about it.  They all already have
the code to handle SIGSEGV, so it's about just tying that new return
value to the existing code, but it's all a bit annoying.

This is the mindless minimal patch to do this.  A more extensive patch
would be to try to gather up the mostly shared fault handling logic into
one generic helper routine, and long-term we really should do that
cleanup.

Just from this patch, you can generally see that most architectures just
copied (directly or indirectly) the old x86 way of doing things, but in
the meantime that original x86 model has been improved to hold the VM
semaphore for shorter times etc and to handle VM_FAULT_RETRY and other
"newer" things, so it would be a good idea to bring all those
improvements to the generic case and teach other architectures about
them too.

Reported-and-tested-by: Takashi Iwai 
Tested-by: Jan Engelhardt 
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens  # "s390 still compiles and boots"
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
[shengyong: Backport to 3.10
 - adjust context
 - ignore modification for arch nios2, because 3.10 does not support it
 - ignore modification for driver lustre, because 3.10 does not support it
 - ignore VM_FAULT_FALLBACK in VM_FAULT_ERROR, becase 3.10 does not support
   this flag
 - add SIGSEGV handling to powerpc/cell spu_fault.c, because 3.10 does not
   separate it to copro_fault.c
 - add SIGSEGV handling in mm/memory.c, because 3.10 does not separate it
   to gup.c
]
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

deal with deadlock in d_walk()

2015-04-29T08:34:00+00:00

commit ca5358ef75fc69fee5322a38a340f5739d997c10 upstream.

... by not hitting rename_retry for reasons other than rename having
happened.  In other words, do _not_ restart when finding that
between unlocking the child and locking the parent the former got
into __dentry_kill().  Skip the killed siblings instead...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Cc: Ben Hutchings 
[hujianyang: Backported to 3.10 refer to the work of Ben Hutchings in 3.2:
 - As we only have try_to_ascend() and not d_walk(), apply this
   change to all callers of try_to_ascend()
 - Adjust context to make __dentry_kill() apply to d_kill()]
Signed-off-by: hujianyang 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

move d_rcu from overlapping d_child to overlapping d_alias

2015-04-29T08:34:00+00:00

commit 946e51f2bf37f1656916eb75bd0742ba33983c28 upstream.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Cc: Ben Hutchings 
[hujianyang: Backported to 3.10 refer to the work of Ben Hutchings in 3.2:
 - Apply name changes in all the different places we use d_alias and d_child
 - Move the WARN_ON() in __d_free() to d_free() as we don't have dentry_free()]
Signed-off-by: hujianyang 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kconfig: Fix warning "‘jump’ may be used uninitialized"

2015-04-29T08:34:00+00:00

commit 2d560306096739e2251329ab5c16059311a151b0 upstream.

Warning:
In file included from scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c:2537:0:
scripts/kconfig/menu.c: In function ‘get_symbol_str’:
scripts/kconfig/menu.c:590:18: warning: ‘jump’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
     jump->offset = strlen(r->s);

Simplifies the test logic because (head && local) means (jump != 0)
and makes GCC happy when checking if the jump pointer was initialized.

Signed-off-by: Peter Kümmel 
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
[ dileks: v2: Backported to fit v3.10 ]
Cc: Sedat Dilek 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman