Pull MFD changes from Samuel Ortiz:
 "MFD bits for the 3.7 merge window.

  As usual we have a few new drivers:

   - TI LP8788
   - TI OMAP USB TLL
   - Maxim MAX8907
   - SMSC ECE1099
   - Dialog Semiconductor DA9055
   - A simpler syscon driver that allow us to get rid of the anatop one.

  Drivers are also gradually getting Device Tree and IRQ domain support.

  The following drivers got DT support:
   - palmas, 88pm860x, tc3589x and twl4030-audio

  And those ones now use the IRQ domain APIs:
   - 88pm860x, tc3589x, db8500_prcmu

  Also some other interesting changes:
   - Intel's ICH LPC now supports Lynx Point
   - TI's twl4030-audio added a GPO child
   - tps6527 enabled its backlight subdevice
   - The twl6030 pwm driver moved to the new PWM subsystem

  And finally a bunch of cleanup and casual fixes for mc13xxx, 88pm860x,
  palmas, ab8500, wm8994, wm5110, max8907 and the tps65xxx family."

Fix up various annoying conflicts: the DT and IRQ domain support came in
twice and was already in 3.6. And then it was apparently rebased.

Guys, DON'T REBASE!

* tag 'mfd-3.7-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-2.6: (89 commits)
  ARM: dts: Enable 88pm860x pmic
  mfd: 88pm860x: Move gpadc init into touch
  mfd: 88pm860x: Device tree support
  mfd: 88pm860x: Use irqdomain
  mfd: smsc: Add support for smsc gpio io/keypad driver
  backlight: tps65217_bl: Add missing platform_set_drvdata in tps65217_bl_probe
  mfd: DA9055 core driver
  mfd: tps65910: Add alarm interrupt of TPS65910 RTC to mfd device list
  mfd: wm5110: Add register patches for revision B
  mfd: wm5110: Disable control interface error report for WM5110 rev B
  mfd: max8907: Remove regulator-compatible from DT docs
  backlight: Add TPS65217 WLED driver
  mfd: Add backlight as subdevice to the tps65217
  mfd: Provide the PRCMU with its own IRQ domain
  mfd: Fix max8907 sparse warning
  mfd: Add lp8788 mfd driver
  mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock
  mfd: rc5t583: Fix warning messages
  regulator: palmas: Add DT support
  mfd: palmas: Change regulator defns to better suite DT
  ...

Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

Commit "regulator: deprecate regulator-compatible DT property" deprecated
the use of the regulator-compatible DT property. Update the DT example in
the MAX8907 binding documentation to reflect this.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

Commit "regulator: deprecate regulator-compatible DT property" deprecated
the use of the regulator-compatible DT property. Update the DT example in
the TPS6586x binding documentation to reflect this.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Commit "regulator: deprecate regulator-compatible DT property" deprecated
the use of the regulator-compatible DT property. Update the DT example in
the TPS65217 binding documentation to reflect this.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

When the bindings for the TPS6586x regulator were being proposed, I
asserted that DT node naming rules for bus child nodes should also be
applied to nodes inside the TPS6586x regulator node itself. In other
words, that each node providing regulator init data should be named
after the type of object it represented ("regulator") and hence that
some other property was required to indicate which regulator the node
described ("regulator-compatible"). In turn this led to multiple nodes
having the same name, thus requiring node names to use a unit address
to make them unique, thus requiring reg properties within the nodes and

However, subsequent discussion indicates that the rules I was asserting
only applies to standardized bus nodes, and within a device's own node,
the binding can basically do anything sane that it wants.

Hence, this change deprecates the register-compatible property, and
instead uses node names to replace this functionality. This greatly
simplifies the device tree content, making them smaller and more legible.

The code is changed such that old device trees continue to work.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Add DT property "maxim,system-power-controller" to indicate whether the
PMIC is in charge of controlling the system power. If this is set, the
driver will provide the pm_power_off() function.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

The MAX8907 is an I2C-based power-management IC containing voltage
regulators, a reset controller, a real-time clock, and a touch-screen
controller.

The original driver was written by:
* Gyungoh Yoo <jack.yoo@maxim-ic.com>

Various fixes and enhancements by:
* Jin Park <jinyoungp@nvidia.com>
* Tom Cherry <tcherry@nvidia.com>
* Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
* Dan Willemsen <dwillemsen@nvidia.com>
* Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>

During upstreaming, I (swarren):
* Converted to regmap.
* Converted to regmap-irq.
* Allowed probing from device tree.
* Renamed from max8907c->max8907, since the driver covers at least the
  C and B revisions.
* General cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo <jack.yoo@maxim-ic.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> #v3
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

Add DT property "ti,system-power-controller" telling whether or not this
pmic is in charge of controlling the system power, so the power off
routine can be hooked up to system call "pm_power_off".

Based on the work by:
Dan Willemsen <dwillemsen@nvidia.com>

Signed-off-by: Bill Huang <bilhuang@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>