linux-toradex.git/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt, branch v4.4.151 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules atomic: remove all traces of READ_ONCE_CTRL() and atomic*_read_ctrl() 2015-11-04T01:22:17+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2015-11-04T01:22:17+00:00 105ff3cbf225036b75a6a46c96d1ddce8e7bdc66 This seems to be a mis-reading of how alpha memory ordering works, and is not backed up by the alpha architecture manual. The helper functions don't do anything special on any other architectures, and the arguments that support them being safe on other architectures also argue that they are safe on alpha. Basically, the "control dependency" is between a previous read and a subsequent write that is dependent on the value read. Even if the subsequent write is actually done speculatively, there is no way that such a speculative write could be made visible to other cpu's until it has been committed, which requires validating the speculation. Note that most weakely ordered architectures (very much including alpha) do not guarantee any ordering relationship between two loads that depend on each other on a control dependency: read A if (val == 1) read B because the conditional may be predicted, and the "read B" may be speculatively moved up to before reading the value A. So we require the user to insert a smp_rmb() between the two accesses to be correct: read A; if (A == 1) smp_rmb() read B Alpha is further special in that it can break that ordering even if the *address* of B depends on the read of A, because the cacheline that is read later may be stale unless you have a memory barrier in between the pointer read and the read of the value behind a pointer: read ptr read offset(ptr) whereas all other weakly ordered architectures guarantee that the data dependency (as opposed to just a control dependency) will order the two accesses. As a result, alpha needs a "smp_read_barrier_depends()" in between those two reads for them to be ordered. The coontrol dependency that "READ_ONCE_CTRL()" and "atomic_read_ctrl()" had was a control dependency to a subsequent *write*, however, and nobody can finalize such a subsequent write without having actually done the read. And were you to write such a value to a "stale" cacheline (the way the unordered reads came to be), that would seem to lose the write entirely. So the things that make alpha able to re-order reads even more aggressively than other weak architectures do not seem to be relevant for a subsequent write. Alpha memory ordering may be strange, but there's no real indication that it is *that* strange. Also, the alpha architecture reference manual very explicitly talks about the definition of "Dependence Constraints" in section 5.6.1.7, where a preceding read dominates a subsequent write. Such a dependence constraint admittedly does not impose a BEFORE (alpha architecture term for globally visible ordering), but it does guarantee that there can be no "causal loop". I don't see how you could avoid such a loop if another cpu could see the stored value and then impact the value of the first read. Put another way: the read and the write could not be seen as being out of order wrt other cpus. So I do not see how these "x_ctrl()" functions can currently be necessary. I may have to eat my words at some point, but in the absense of clear proof that alpha actually needs this, or indeed even an explanation of how alpha could _possibly_ need it, I do not believe these functions are called for. And if it turns out that alpha really _does_ need a barrier for this case, that barrier still should not be "smp_read_barrier_depends()". We'd have to make up some new speciality barrier just for alpha, along with the documentation for why it really is necessary. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul E McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 
This seems to be a mis-reading of how alpha memory ordering works, and
is not backed up by the alpha architecture manual.  The helper functions
don't do anything special on any other architectures, and the arguments
that support them being safe on other architectures also argue that they
are safe on alpha.

Basically, the "control dependency" is between a previous read and a
subsequent write that is dependent on the value read.  Even if the
subsequent write is actually done speculatively, there is no way that
such a speculative write could be made visible to other cpu's until it
has been committed, which requires validating the speculation.

Note that most weakely ordered architectures (very much including alpha)
do not guarantee any ordering relationship between two loads that depend
on each other on a control dependency:

    read A
    if (val == 1)
        read B

because the conditional may be predicted, and the "read B" may be
speculatively moved up to before reading the value A.  So we require the
user to insert a smp_rmb() between the two accesses to be correct:

    read A;
    if (A == 1)
        smp_rmb()
        read B

Alpha is further special in that it can break that ordering even if the
*address* of B depends on the read of A, because the cacheline that is
read later may be stale unless you have a memory barrier in between the
pointer read and the read of the value behind a pointer:

    read ptr
    read offset(ptr)

whereas all other weakly ordered architectures guarantee that the data
dependency (as opposed to just a control dependency) will order the two
accesses.  As a result, alpha needs a "smp_read_barrier_depends()" in
between those two reads for them to be ordered.

The coontrol dependency that "READ_ONCE_CTRL()" and "atomic_read_ctrl()"
had was a control dependency to a subsequent *write*, however, and
nobody can finalize such a subsequent write without having actually done
the read.  And were you to write such a value to a "stale" cacheline
(the way the unordered reads came to be), that would seem to lose the
write entirely.

So the things that make alpha able to re-order reads even more
aggressively than other weak architectures do not seem to be relevant
for a subsequent write.  Alpha memory ordering may be strange, but
there's no real indication that it is *that* strange.

Also, the alpha architecture reference manual very explicitly talks
about the definition of "Dependence Constraints" in section 5.6.1.7,
where a preceding read dominates a subsequent write.

Such a dependence constraint admittedly does not impose a BEFORE (alpha
architecture term for globally visible ordering), but it does guarantee
that there can be no "causal loop".  I don't see how you could avoid
such a loop if another cpu could see the stored value and then impact
the value of the first read.  Put another way: the read and the write
could not be seen as being out of order wrt other cpus.

So I do not see how these "x_ctrl()" functions can currently be necessary.

I may have to eat my words at some point, but in the absense of clear
proof that alpha actually needs this, or indeed even an explanation of
how alpha could _possibly_ need it, I do not believe these functions are
called for.

And if it turns out that alpha really _does_ need a barrier for this
case, that barrier still should not be "smp_read_barrier_depends()".
We'd have to make up some new speciality barrier just for alpha, along
with the documentation for why it really is necessary.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul E McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2015-11-04T00:10:43+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2015-11-04T00:10:43+00:00 d63a9788650fcd999b34584316afee6bd4378f19 Pull locking changes from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle were: - More gradual enhancements to atomic ops: new atomic*_read_ctrl() ops, synchronize atomic_{read,set}() ordering requirements between architectures, add atomic_long_t bitops. (Peter Zijlstra) - Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for inc/dec atomics and use them in various locking primitives: mutex, rtmutex, mcs, rwsem. This enables weakly ordered architectures (such as arm64) to make use of more locking related optimizations. (Davidlohr Bueso) - Implement atomic[64]_{inc,dec}_relaxed() on ARM. (Will Deacon) - Futex kernel data cache footprint micro-optimization. (Rasmus Villemoes) - pvqspinlock runtime overhead micro-optimization. (Waiman Long) - misc smaller fixlets" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: ARM, locking/atomics: Implement _relaxed variants of atomic[64]_{inc,dec} locking/rwsem: Use acquire/release semantics locking/mcs: Use acquire/release semantics locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics locking/mutex: Use acquire/release semantics locking/asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for inc/dec atomics atomic: Implement atomic_read_ctrl() atomic, arch: Audit atomic_{read,set}() atomic: Add atomic_long_t bitops futex: Force hot variables into a single cache line locking/pvqspinlock: Kick the PV CPU unconditionally when _Q_SLOW_VAL locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics locking/qrwlock: Rename ->lock to ->wait_lock locking/Documentation/lockstat: Fix typo - lokcing -> locking locking/atomics, cmpxchg: Privatize the inclusion of asm/cmpxchg.h 
Pull locking changes from Ingo Molnar:
 "The main changes in this cycle were:

   - More gradual enhancements to atomic ops: new atomic*_read_ctrl()
     ops, synchronize atomic_{read,set}() ordering requirements between
     architectures, add atomic_long_t bitops.  (Peter Zijlstra)

   - Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for inc/dec atomics and
     use them in various locking primitives: mutex, rtmutex, mcs, rwsem.
     This enables weakly ordered architectures (such as arm64) to make
     use of more locking related optimizations.  (Davidlohr Bueso)

   - Implement atomic[64]_{inc,dec}_relaxed() on ARM.  (Will Deacon)

   - Futex kernel data cache footprint micro-optimization.  (Rasmus
     Villemoes)

   - pvqspinlock runtime overhead micro-optimization.  (Waiman Long)

   - misc smaller fixlets"

* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  ARM, locking/atomics: Implement _relaxed variants of atomic[64]_{inc,dec}
  locking/rwsem: Use acquire/release semantics
  locking/mcs: Use acquire/release semantics
  locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics
  locking/mutex: Use acquire/release semantics
  locking/asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for inc/dec atomics
  atomic: Implement atomic_read_ctrl()
  atomic, arch: Audit atomic_{read,set}()
  atomic: Add atomic_long_t bitops
  futex: Force hot variables into a single cache line
  locking/pvqspinlock: Kick the PV CPU unconditionally when _Q_SLOW_VAL
  locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics
  locking/qrwlock: Rename ->lock to ->wait_lock
  locking/Documentation/lockstat: Fix typo - lokcing -> locking
  locking/atomics, cmpxchg: Privatize the inclusion of asm/cmpxchg.h
documentation: Add lockless_dereference() 2015-10-06T18:22:57+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2015-09-17T15:18:32+00:00 ad2ad5d31f90fc6fb269e9be244224cecfc8b400 The recently added lockless_dereference() macro is not present in the Documentation/ directory, so this commit fixes that. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> 
The recently added lockless_dereference() macro is not present in the
Documentation/ directory, so this commit fixes that.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
documentation: No acquire/release for RCU readers 2015-10-06T18:22:28+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2015-08-01T17:45:26+00:00 27566139b6e2f6cfe273e8bb0e538d7616c2ea00 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt calls out RCU as one of the sets of primitives associated with ACQUIRE and RELEASE. There really is an association in that rcu_assign_pointer() includes a RELEASE operation, but a quick read can convince people that rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() have ACQUIRE and RELEASE semantics, which they do not. This commit therefore removes RCU from this list in order to avoid this confusion. Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> 
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt calls out RCU as one of the sets
of primitives associated with ACQUIRE and RELEASE.  There really
is an association in that rcu_assign_pointer() includes a RELEASE
operation, but a quick read can convince people that rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_read_unlock() have ACQUIRE and RELEASE semantics, which they do not.

This commit therefore removes RCU from this list in order to avoid
this confusion.

Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
atomic: Implement atomic_read_ctrl() 2015-09-23T07:54:29+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2015-09-18T11:22:52+00:00 e3e72ab80a3fac0b88e07d358a2c75724ccd66b4 Provide atomic_read_ctrl() to mirror READ_ONCE_CTRL(), such that we can more conveniently use atomics in control dependencies. Since we can assume atomic_read() implies a READ_ONCE(), we must only emit an extra smp_read_barrier_depends() in order to upgrade to READ_ONCE_CTRL() semantics. Requested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150918115637.GM3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> 
Provide atomic_read_ctrl() to mirror READ_ONCE_CTRL(), such that we can
more conveniently use atomics in control dependencies.

Since we can assume atomic_read() implies a READ_ONCE(), we must only
emit an extra smp_read_barrier_depends() in order to upgrade to
READ_ONCE_CTRL() semantics.

Requested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150918115637.GM3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2015-09-03T22:46:07+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2015-09-03T22:46:07+00:00 ca520cab25e0e8da717c596ccaa2c2b3650cfa09 Pull locking and atomic updates from Ingo Molnar: "Main changes in this cycle are: - Extend atomic primitives with coherent logic op primitives (atomic_{or,and,xor}()) and deprecate the old partial APIs (atomic_{set,clear}_mask()) The old ops were incoherent with incompatible signatures across architectures and with incomplete support. Now every architecture supports the primitives consistently (by Peter Zijlstra) - Generic support for 'relaxed atomics': - _acquire/release/relaxed() flavours of xchg(), cmpxchg() and {add,sub}_return() - atomic_read_acquire() - atomic_set_release() This came out of porting qwrlock code to arm64 (by Will Deacon) - Clean up the fragile static_key APIs that were causing repeat bugs, by introducing a new one: DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(name); DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(name); which define a key of different types with an initial true/false value. Then allow: static_branch_likely() static_branch_unlikely() to take a key of either type and emit the right instruction for the case. To be able to know the 'type' of the static key we encode it in the jump entry (by Peter Zijlstra) - Static key self-tests (by Jason Baron) - qrwlock optimizations (by Waiman Long) - small futex enhancements (by Davidlohr Bueso) - ... and misc other changes" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (63 commits) jump_label/x86: Work around asm build bug on older/backported GCCs locking, ARM, atomics: Define our SMP atomics in terms of _relaxed() operations locking, include/llist: Use linux/atomic.h instead of asm/cmpxchg.h locking/qrwlock: Make use of _{acquire|release|relaxed}() atomics locking/qrwlock: Implement queue_write_unlock() using smp_store_release() locking/lockref: Remove homebrew cmpxchg64_relaxed() macro definition locking, asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for 'atomic_long_t' locking, asm-generic: Rework atomic-long.h to avoid bulk code duplication locking/atomics: Add _{acquire|release|relaxed}() variants of some atomic operations locking, compiler.h: Cast away attributes in the WRITE_ONCE() magic locking/static_keys: Make verify_keys() static jump label, locking/static_keys: Update docs locking/static_keys: Provide a selftest jump_label: Provide a self-test s390/uaccess, locking/static_keys: employ static_branch_likely() x86, tsc, locking/static_keys: Employ static_branch_likely() locking/static_keys: Add selftest locking/static_keys: Add a new static_key interface locking/static_keys: Rework update logic locking/static_keys: Add static_key_{en,dis}able() helpers ... 
Pull locking and atomic updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "Main changes in this cycle are:

   - Extend atomic primitives with coherent logic op primitives
     (atomic_{or,and,xor}()) and deprecate the old partial APIs
     (atomic_{set,clear}_mask())

     The old ops were incoherent with incompatible signatures across
     architectures and with incomplete support.  Now every architecture
     supports the primitives consistently (by Peter Zijlstra)

   - Generic support for 'relaxed atomics':

       - _acquire/release/relaxed() flavours of xchg(), cmpxchg() and {add,sub}_return()
       - atomic_read_acquire()
       - atomic_set_release()

     This came out of porting qwrlock code to arm64 (by Will Deacon)

   - Clean up the fragile static_key APIs that were causing repeat bugs,
     by introducing a new one:

       DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(name);
       DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(name);

     which define a key of different types with an initial true/false
     value.

     Then allow:

       static_branch_likely()
       static_branch_unlikely()

     to take a key of either type and emit the right instruction for the
     case.  To be able to know the 'type' of the static key we encode it
     in the jump entry (by Peter Zijlstra)

   - Static key self-tests (by Jason Baron)

   - qrwlock optimizations (by Waiman Long)

   - small futex enhancements (by Davidlohr Bueso)

   - ... and misc other changes"

* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (63 commits)
  jump_label/x86: Work around asm build bug on older/backported GCCs
  locking, ARM, atomics: Define our SMP atomics in terms of _relaxed() operations
  locking, include/llist: Use linux/atomic.h instead of asm/cmpxchg.h
  locking/qrwlock: Make use of _{acquire|release|relaxed}() atomics
  locking/qrwlock: Implement queue_write_unlock() using smp_store_release()
  locking/lockref: Remove homebrew cmpxchg64_relaxed() macro definition
  locking, asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for 'atomic_long_t'
  locking, asm-generic: Rework atomic-long.h to avoid bulk code duplication
  locking/atomics: Add _{acquire|release|relaxed}() variants of some atomic operations
  locking, compiler.h: Cast away attributes in the WRITE_ONCE() magic
  locking/static_keys: Make verify_keys() static
  jump label, locking/static_keys: Update docs
  locking/static_keys: Provide a selftest
  jump_label: Provide a self-test
  s390/uaccess, locking/static_keys: employ static_branch_likely()
  x86, tsc, locking/static_keys: Employ static_branch_likely()
  locking/static_keys: Add selftest
  locking/static_keys: Add a new static_key interface
  locking/static_keys: Rework update logic
  locking/static_keys: Add static_key_{en,dis}able() helpers
  ...
rcu,locking: Privatize smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() 2015-08-04T15:49:21+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2015-07-15T01:35:23+00:00 12d560f4ea87030667438a169912380be00cea4b RCU is the only thing that uses smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), and is likely the only thing that ever will use it, so this commit makes this macro private to RCU. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> 
RCU is the only thing that uses smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), and is
likely the only thing that ever will use it, so this commit makes this
macro private to RCU.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
locking/Documentation: Clarify failed cmpxchg() memory ordering semantics 2015-08-03T08:57:09+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2015-07-16T15:10:06+00:00 ed2de9f74ecbbf3063d29b2334e7b455d7f35189 A failed cmpxchg does not provide any memory ordering guarantees, a property that is used to optimise the cmpxchg implementations on Alpha, PowerPC and arm64. This patch updates atomic_ops.txt and memory-barriers.txt to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150716151006.GH26390@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> 
A failed cmpxchg does not provide any memory ordering guarantees, a
property that is used to optimise the cmpxchg implementations on Alpha,
PowerPC and arm64.

This patch updates atomic_ops.txt and memory-barriers.txt to reflect
this.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150716151006.GH26390@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
doc: Call out smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() transitivity 2015-07-15T21:43:14+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2015-07-13T22:55:52+00:00 96d7744e0a5631a1b5fef2a97658150b165f02b6 Although "full barrier" should be interpreted as providing transitivity, it is worth eliminating any possible confusion. This commit therefore adds "(including transitivity)" to eliminate any possible confusion. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
Although "full barrier" should be interpreted as providing transitivity,
it is worth eliminating any possible confusion.  This commit therefore
adds "(including transitivity)" to eliminate any possible confusion.

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
documentation: Replace ACCESS_ONCE() by READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() 2015-07-15T21:43:13+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2015-06-18T21:33:24+00:00 9af194cefc3c40e75a59df4cbb06e1c1064bee7f Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>