The 32-bit ARM port doesn't have ACPI headers, and conditionally
including them is going to look horrendous. In preparation for sharing
the PSCI invocation code with 32-bit, move the acpi_psci_* function
declarations and definitions such that the PSCI client code need not
include ACPI headers.

While it would seem like we could simply hide the ACPI includes in
psci.h, the ACPI headers have hilarious circular dependencies which make
this infeasible without reorganising most of ACPICA. So rather than
doing that, move the acpi_psci_* prototypes into psci.h.

The psci_acpi_init function is made dependent on CONFIG_ACPI (with a
stub implementation in asm/psci.h) such that it need not be built for
32-bit ARM or kernels without ACPI support. The currently missing __init
annotations are added to the prototypes in the header.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The code that initializes cpus on arm64 is currently split in two
different code paths that carry out DT and ACPI cpus initialization.

Most of the code executing SMP initialization is common and should
be merged to reduce discrepancies between ACPI and DT initialization
and to have code initializing cpus in a single common place in the
kernel.

This patch refactors arm64 SMP cpus initialization code to merge
ACPI and DT boot paths in a common file and to create sanity
checks that can be reused by both boot methods.

Current code assumes PSCI is the only available boot method
when arm64 boots with ACPI; this can be easily extended if/when
the ACPI parking protocol is merged into the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT]
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

ARM64 CPU operations such as cpu_init and cpu_init_idle take
a struct device_node pointer as a parameter, which corresponds to
the device tree node of the logical cpu on which the operation
has to be applied.

With the advent of ACPI on arm64, where MADT static table entries
are used to initialize cpus, the device tree node parameter
in cpu_ops hooks become useless when booting with ACPI, since
in that case cpu device tree nodes are not present and can not be
used for cpu initialization.

The current cpu_init hook requires a struct device_node pointer
parameter because it is called while parsing the device tree to
initialize CPUs, when the cpu_logical_map (that is used to match
a cpu node reg property to a device tree node) for a given logical
cpu id is not set up yet. This means that the cpu_init hook cannot
rely on the of_get_cpu_node function to retrieve the device tree
node corresponding to the logical cpu id passed in as parameter,
so the cpu device tree node must be passed in as a parameter to fix
this catch-22 dependency cycle.

This patch reshuffles the cpu_logical_map initialization code so
that the cpu_init cpu_ops hook can safely use the of_get_cpu_node
function to retrieve the cpu device tree node, removing the need for
the device tree node pointer parameter.

In the process, the patch removes device tree node parameters
from all cpu_ops hooks, in preparation for SMP DT/ACPI cpus
initialization consolidation.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT]
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Since the only caller of acpi_parse_gic_cpu_interface() doesn't
need the return value, make it have a void return type to avoid
introducing subtle bugs, and update the comments of the function
accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

MADT scanning will stop when it gets an error from the handler,
acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface(), on arm64.  However, we need to
find all of the enabled CPUs so that SMP initialization can work
properly.  So, if an error occurs in this case, ignore it for
now so that we can find all of the enabled CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

acpi_parse_gic_cpu_interface calls acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface by both
passing a 32-bit value in the u8 enabled parameter and then subsequently
ignoring its return value.

Sort it out.

Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

If acpi=force is passed on the command line, it forces ACPI to be
the only available boot method, hence it must be left enabled even
if the initialization and sanity checks on ACPI tables fails.

This patch refactors ACPI initialization to prevent disabling ACPI
if acpi=force is passed on the command line.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Current ACPI init code on ARM64 relies on acpi_table_parse() API to
check if the FADT is present and to carry out sanity checks on that.

The handler passed to the acpi_table_parse() function and used to
carry out the parsing on the requested table returns a value that is
ignored by the acpi_table_parse() function, so it is not possible
to propagate errors back to the acpi_table_parse() caller through
the handler.

This forces ARM64 ACPI init code to have disable_acpi() calls scattered
all over the place that makes code unwieldy and not easy to follow.

This patch refactors the ARM64 ACPI init code, by creating a
self-contained function (ie acpi_fadt_sanity_check()) that carries
out the required checks on FADT and returns an adequate return value
to the caller. This allows creating a common error path that disables
ACPI and makes code more readable and easy to parse and change were
further checks FADT to be added in the future.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The code deployed to implement GSI linux IRQ numbers mapping on arm64 turns
out to be generic enough so that it can be moved to ACPI core code along
with its respective config option ACPI_GENERIC_GSI selectable on
architectures that can reuse the same code.

Current ACPI IRQ mapping code is not integrated in the kernel IRQ domain
infrastructure, in particular there is no way to look-up the
IRQ domain associated with a particular interrupt controller, so this
first version of GSI generic code carries out the GSI<->IRQ mapping relying
on the IRQ default domain which is supposed to be always set on a
specific architecture in case the domain structure passed to
irq_create/find_mapping() functions is missing.

This patch moves the arm64 acpi functions that implement the gsi mappings:

acpi_gsi_to_irq()
acpi_register_gsi()
acpi_unregister_gsi()

to ACPI core code. Since the generic GSI<->domain mapping is based on IRQ
domains, it can be extended as soon as a way to map an interrupt
controller to an IRQ domain is implemented for ACPI in the IRQ domain
layer.

x86 and ia64 code for GSI mappings cannot rely on the generic GSI
layer at present for legacy reasons, so they do not select the
ACPI_GENERIC_GSI config options and keep relying on their arch
specific GSI mapping layer.

Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early
param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled
in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both
acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is
unflattened.

CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>