When compiling with W=1 enabling -Wmissing-prototypes the compiler warns: arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:146:6: error: no previous prototype for 'nommu_dump_state' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] This function is not used so remove it. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230810141947.1236730-17-arnd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
When compiling with W=1 enabling -Wmissing-prototypes the compiler warns: arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:221:17: sing-prototypesrror: no previous prototype for 'die' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] Fix by adding the prototype to the appropriate header file and including the header file in the appropriate C files. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230810141947.1236730-17-arnd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
When compiling with W=1 enabling -Wmissing-prototypes the compiler warns: arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:67:6: error: no previous prototype for 'show_registers' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] Fix by adding the prototype to the appropriate header file and including the header file in the appropriate C files. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230810141947.1236730-17-arnd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
These functions are all called from assembly files so there is no need for a prototype in a header file, but when compiling with W=1 enabling -Wmissing-prototypes the compiler warns: arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:191:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_enter' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:210:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_leave' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:293:1: error: no previous prototype for 'do_work_pending' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:68:17: error: no previous prototype for '_sys_rt_sigreturn' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c:111:25: error: no previous prototype for 'timer_interrupt' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:239:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unhandled_exception' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:246:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_fpe_trap' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:268:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_trap' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:273:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_unaligned_access' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:286:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_bus_fault' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:462:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_illegal_instruction' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/mm/fault.c:44:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_page_fault' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] Since these are not needed in header files, fix these by adding prototypes to the top of the respective C files. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230810141947.1236730-17-arnd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Add support for handling floating point exceptions and forwarding the SIGFPE signal to processes. Also, add fpu state to sigcontext. Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
OpenRISC floating point state is not so expensive to save as OpenRISC uses general purpose registers for floating point instructions. We need to save only the floating point status and control register, FPCSR. Add support to maintain the FPCSR unconditionally upon exceptions and switches. On machines that do not support FPU this will always just store 0x0 and restore is a no-op. On FPU systems this adds an additional special purpose register read/write and read/write to memory (already cached). Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Noticed this when workin on warnings. As unhandled_exception is used in entry.S we should attribute it with asmlinkage. Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
This was noticed when I saw this warning:
arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:234:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'die_if_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
234 | void die_if_kernel(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
The die_if_kernel function is not used in the OpenRISC port so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Sparse was reporting the following warnings:
arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:37:5: warning: symbol 'kstack_depth_to_print' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:39:22: warning: symbol 'lwa_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c:41:6: warning: symbol 'print_trace' was not declared. Should it be static?
The function print_trace and local variables kstack_depth_to_print and
lwa_addr are not used outside of this file. This patch marks them as
static.
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Currently show registers, print memory dumps character by character and
there is no address information, so its a bit difficult to use. For
example before a stack dump looks as follows.
[ 13.650000] Stack:
[ 13.650000] Call trace
[ 13.690000] [<(ptrval)>] ? put_timespec64+0x44/0x60
[ 13.690000] [<(ptrval)>] ? _data_page_fault_handler+0x104/0x10c
[ 13.700000]
[ 13.700000] Code:
[ 13.700000] 13
[ 13.700000] ff
[ 13.700000] ff
[ 13.700000] f9
[ 13.710000] 84
[ 13.710000] 82
[ 13.710000] ff
[ 13.710000] bc
[ 13.710000] 07
[ 13.710000] fd
[ 13.720000] 4e
[ 13.720000] 67
[ 13.720000] 84
[ 13.720000] 62
[ 13.720000] ff
...
This change updates this to print the address and data a word at time.
[ 0.830000] Stack:
[ 0.830000] Call trace:
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] load_elf_binary+0x744/0xf5c
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] ? __kernel_read+0x144/0x184
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] bprm_execve+0x27c/0x3e4
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] kernel_execve+0x16c/0x1a0
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] run_init_process+0xa0/0xec
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x14c
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] kernel_init+0x7c/0x14c
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] ? calculate_sigpending+0x30/0x40
[ 0.830000] [<(ptrval)>] ret_from_fork+0x1c/0x84
[ 0.830000]
[ 0.830000] c1033dbc: c1033dec
[ 0.830000] c1033dc0: c015258c
[ 0.830000] c1033dc4: c129da00
[ 0.830000] c1033dc8: 00000002
[ 0.830000] c1033dcc: 00000000
[ 0.830000] c1033dd0: c129da00
[ 0.830000] c1033dd4: 00000000
[ 0.830000] c1033dd8: 00000000
[ 0.830000] (c1033ddc:) 00001e04
[ 0.830000] c1033de0: 001501fc
[ 0.830000] c1033de4: c1033e68
[ 0.830000] c1033de8: c0152e60
[ 0.830000] c1033dec: c129da5c
[ 0.830000] c1033df0: c0674a20
[ 0.830000] c1033df4: c1033e50
[ 0.830000] c1033df8: c00e3d6c
[ 0.830000] c1033dfc: c129da5c
[ 0.830000] c1033e00: 00000003
[ 0.830000] c1033e04: 00150000
[ 0.830000] c1033e08: 00002034
[ 0.830000] c1033e0c: 001501fc
[ 0.830000] c1033e10: 00000000
[ 0.830000] c1033e14: 00150000
[ 0.830000] c1033e18: 0014ebbc
[ 0.830000] c1033e1c: 00002000
[ 0.830000] c1033e20: 00000003
[ 0.830000] c1033e24: c12a07e0
[ 0.830000] c1033e28: 00000000
[ 0.830000] c1033e2c: 00000000
[ 0.830000] c1033e30: 00000000
[ 0.830000] c1033e34: 40040000
[ 0.830000] c1033e38: 00000000
[ 0.830000]
[ 0.830000] Code:
[ 0.830000] c00047a4: 9c21fff8
[ 0.830000] c00047a8: d4012000
[ 0.830000] c00047ac: d4011804
[ 0.830000] c00047b0: e4040000
[ 0.830000] c00047b4: 10000005
[ 0.830000] c00047b8: 9c84ffff
[ 0.830000] (c00047bc:) d8030000
[ 0.830000] c00047c0: 03fffffc
[ 0.830000] c00047c4: 9c630001
[ 0.830000] c00047c8: 9d640001
[ 0.830000] c00047cc: 84810000
[ 0.830000] c00047d0: 84610004
Now we are also printing a bit of the stack as well as the code. The
stack is output to help with debugging. There may be concern about
exposing sensitive information on the stack, but we are already dumping
all register content which would have similar sensitive information. So
I am going ahead as this proves useful in investigation.
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>