linux-toradex.git/arch/score/include, branch v4.10

Replace with globally

2016-12-24T19:46:01+00:00

This was entirely automated, using the script by Al:

  PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*'
  sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include !" \
        $(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h)

to do the replacement at the end of the merge window.

Requested-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

locking/core: Provide common cpu_relax_yield() definition

2016-11-17T07:17:36+00:00

No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since
the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is
s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield()
in sched.h.

Suggested-by: Russell King 
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand 
Acked-by: Russell King 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Nicholas Piggin 
Cc: Noam Camus 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479298985-191589-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/core, arch: Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency()

2016-11-16T09:15:11+00:00

As there are no users left, we can remove cpu_relax_lowlatency()
implementations from every architecture.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Nicholas Piggin 
Cc: Noam Camus 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Russell King 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477386195-32736-6-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/core: Introduce cpu_relax_yield()

2016-11-16T09:15:09+00:00

For spinning loops people do often use barrier() or cpu_relax().
For most architectures cpu_relax and barrier are the same, but on
some architectures cpu_relax can add some latency.
For example on power,sparc64 and arc, cpu_relax can shift the CPU
towards other hardware threads in an SMT environment.
On s390 cpu_relax does even more, it uses an hypercall to the
hypervisor to give up the timeslice.
In contrast to the SMT yielding this can result in larger latencies.
In some places this latency is unwanted, so another variant
"cpu_relax_lowlatency" was introduced. Before this is used in more
and more places, lets revert the logic and provide a cpu_relax_yield
that can be called in places where yielding is more important than
latency. By default this is the same as cpu_relax on all architectures.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Nicholas Piggin 
Cc: Noam Camus 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Russell King 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477386195-32736-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/mutex: Kill arch specific code

2016-10-25T09:31:51+00:00

Its all generic atomic_long_t stuff now.

Tested-by: Jason Low 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

score: separate extable.h, switch module.h to it

2016-10-05T22:38:39+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

score: fix copy_from_user() and friends

2016-09-13T21:50:14+00:00

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

score: fix __get_user/get_user

2016-09-13T21:50:13+00:00

* should zero on any failure
* __get_user() should use __copy_from_user(), not copy_from_user()

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

score: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

2016-06-25T00:23:52+00:00

__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.

pte_alloc_one{_kernel} allocate PTE_ORDER which is 0.  This means that
this flag has never been actually useful here because it has always been
used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-11-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Chen Liqin 
Cc: Lennox Wu 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

asm-generic: Drop renameat syscall from default list

2016-05-04T22:42:21+00:00

The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
to include renameat.

Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unless
__ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT is defined by the architecture's unistd.h prior to
including asm-generic/unistd.h, and adjust all architectures using the
generic syscall list to define it so that no in-tree architectures are
affected.

Signed-off-by: James Hogan 
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta 
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Salter 
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot 
Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Cc: Richard Kuo 
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonas Bonn 
Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net
Cc: Chen Liqin 
Cc: Lennox Wu 
Cc: Chris Metcalf 
Cc: Guan Xuetao 
Cc: Ley Foon Tan 
Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org
Cc: Yoshinori Sato 
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann