There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 46394fd01 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of
the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers,
because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when
container system devices are registered.  However, there are user
space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of
its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more.

For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be
generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along
with all of its children.

Fixes: 46394fd01 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core)
Reported-and-tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI containers
if CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is unset by compiling out the container
scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling
its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either
case.

This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

* acpi-cleanup:
  ACPI: Remove duplicate definitions of PREFIX
  ACPI / tables: Replace printk with pr_*

* acpi-thermal:
  ACPI / thermal: make acpi_thermal_check asynchronous on resume

* acpi-pci:
  ACPI / PCI: Do not call ISA-specific code if ISA is not supported

* acpi-lpss:
  ACPI / LPSS: Add Intel BayTrail ACPI mode PWM

* acpi-button:
  ACPI / button: Add ACPI Button event via netlink routine

We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in
drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones
in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / hotplug: Rework deferred execution of acpi_device_hotplug()
  ACPI / dock: Update copyright notice
  ACPI / dock: Drop remove_dock_dependent_devices()
  ACPI / dock: Drop struct acpi_dock_ops and all code related to it
  ACPI / ATA: Add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions of SATA devices
  ACPI / dock: Add .uevent() callback to struct acpi_hotplug_context
  ACPI / dock: Use callback pointers from devices' ACPI hotplug contexts
  ACPI / dock: Use ACPI device object pointers instead of ACPI handles
  ACPI / hotplug: Add .fixup() callback to struct acpi_hotplug_context
  ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not clear event callback pointer for docks
  ACPI / dock: Associate dock platform devices with ACPI device objects
  ACPI / dock: Pass ACPI device pointer to acpi_device_is_battery()
  ACPI / dock: Dispatch dock notifications from the global notify handler

The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan
before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock
device objects.  Then, it registers a notify handler for each of
them for handling dock events.

However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront.  They
very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase
of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI
drivers to ACPI device objects.  Then, the dependent devices can be
added to the in the second phase.  That makes it possible to drop
the extra namespace scan, so do it.

Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all
of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may
be dispatched from the global notify handler for them.  Do that and
drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more.

Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the
ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects
and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea,
because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway.
For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI
device objects representing dock stations and the container scan
handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To avoid leaking memory on errors from device_register(), do a
put_device() on the device object in question in the error code
path of container_device_attach().

Fixes: caa73ea158de (ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least
on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out
system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in
the container.  However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers
first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it
notifies user space of the container offline.

Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device
objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects
representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace
nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even
if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the
return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those
cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there).
Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that
will go away during container hot-unplug.

The goal of this change is to address both the above issues.

The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each
of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace
scan or on a hotplug event making the container present.  That system
device will be unregistered on container removal.  A new bus type
for container devices is added for this purpose, because device
offline and online operations need to be defined for them.  The
online operation is a trivial function that is always successful
and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's
offline member.

For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI
device objects right below the container object (its children) and
checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline.  If
that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system
devivce cannot be put offline.  Consequently, to put the container
system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical
devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand.

Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are
initially online.  They are created by the container ACPI scan
handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set.  That causes
acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system
device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or
any devices below it.  If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is
emitted for the container system device in question and user space
is expected to offline all devices below the container and the
container itself in response to it.  Then, user space can finalize
the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device
object's eject attribute in sysfs.

Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the
container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks.

This way the core will not have to special-case containers and
the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container
is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>