Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to
ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to
struct acpi_device directly.

There are two benefits from that.  First, the somewhat ugly and
hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same
struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point
to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>

There are no references to the dock_device_ids[] table anywhere in
the code and it is not even useful for module autoloading, because
the dock driver can only be built in, so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* acpi-cleanup:
  ACPI: Remove duplicate definitions of PREFIX
  ACPI / tables: Replace printk with pr_*

* acpi-thermal:
  ACPI / thermal: make acpi_thermal_check asynchronous on resume

* acpi-pci:
  ACPI / PCI: Do not call ISA-specific code if ISA is not supported

* acpi-lpss:
  ACPI / LPSS: Add Intel BayTrail ACPI mode PWM

* acpi-button:
  ACPI / button: Add ACPI Button event via netlink routine

We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in
drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones
in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Update the copyright notice of the ACPI dock driver to reflect the
fact that substantial changes have been made to it recently.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since remove_dock_dependent_devices() is only called from acpi_dock_add()
and it only is called if the add_dock_dependent_device() adding the
dock station to its own list of dependent devices has failed, it is not
really necessary, because the dock station's list of dependent devices
is guaranteed to be empty at that point.  Drop it, then.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since struct acpi_dock_ops and the code handling it don't have any
users any more after the previous changes, drop that structure and
the code related to it altogether.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock
operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to
struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that
callback if available.  Also rename the existing .event() callback
in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible
confusion in the future.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Instead of requiring a set of special dock operations to be registered
via register_hotplug_dock_device() for each ACPI dock device, it is
much more straightforward to use callback pointers from the devices'
hotplug contexts if available.

For this reason, modify dock_hotplug_event() to use callback pointers
from the hotplug contexts of ACPI devices and fall back to using the
special dock operarions only if those callbacks are missing.  Also
make the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem set the .fixup
callback pointer in the hotplug contexts of devices handled by it to
a new function, acpiphp_post_dock_fixup(), so that the dock station
driver can use the callbacks from those contexts instead of special
dock operations registered via register_hotplug_dock_device().

Along with the above changes drop the ACPIPHP's dock operations that
are not necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Rework the ACPI dock station driver to store ACPI device object
pointers instead of ACPI handles in its internal data structures.

The purpose is moslty to make subsequent simplifications possible,
but also this allows the overall code size to be reduced slightly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>