* acpi-processor:
  ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID"
  ACPI / processor: Return specific error value when mapping lapic id

* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / scan: Clear match_driver flag in acpi_bus_trim()

* acpi-init:
  ACPI / init: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API

* acpi-pm:
  ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI companions of devices

* acpica:
  ACPICA: Remove bool usage from ACPICA.

Usually, 0 is returned for success in int-returning functions and
negative value are returned on failure, but in processor_core.c, some
function return 1 for success and 0 for failure which causes confusion
to happen sometimes, so modify the functions in question to follow the
common convention..

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and
<acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h>
inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't
necessary.

First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
should not be included directly from any files that are built for
CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about
undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds.  For CONFIG_ACPI set,
<linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it
provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case.

Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always
have to be met.  Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included
prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the
latter depends on are always there.  And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides
basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other
ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds.  That also is taken care of including
<linux/acpi.h> as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff)
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

For cpu hot add, we evaluate _MAT or parse MADT twice to get APIC id,
here is the code logic:
acpi_processor_add()
	acpi_processor_get_info()
		acpi_get_cpuid() will evaluate _MAT or parse MADT;
	acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
		acpi_map_lsapic() will evaluate _MAT again;

This can be done more effectively, this patch introduces apic_id in struct
processor to save parsed APIC id, and then we can use it and remove the
duplicated _MAT evaluation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

__initdata should be placed between the variable name and equal
sign for the variable to be placed in the intended section.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

This removes all the drivers/acpi uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

kfree() on a NULL pointer is a no-op, so remove a redundant NULL
pointer check in map_mat_entry().

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Syam Sidhardhan <s.syam@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit d640113fe80e45ebd4a5b420b introduced a regression on SMP
systems where the processor core with ACPI id zero is disabled
(typically should be the case because of hyperthreading).
The regression got spread through stable kernels.
On 3.0.X it got introduced via 3.0.18.

Such platforms may be rare, but do exist.
Look out for a disabled processor with acpi_id 0 in dmesg:
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x10] disabled)

This problem has been observed on a:
HP Proliant BL280c G6 blade

This patch restricts the introduced workaround to platforms
with nr_cpu_ids <= 1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

For UP processor, it is likely that no _MAT method or MADT table defined.
So currently acpi_get_cpuid(...) always return -1 for UP processor.
This is wrong. It should return valid value for CPU0.

In the other hand, BIOS may define multiple CPU handles even for UP
processor, for example

        Scope (_PR)
        {
            Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
            Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
            Processor (CPU2, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
            Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
        }

We should only return valid value for CPU0's acpi handle.
And return invalid value for others.

http://marc.info/?t=132329819900003&r=1&w=2

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: wallak@free.fr
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>