We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in
drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones
in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get an ACPI device instead of
acpi_bus_get_device() in the processor driver.

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Function acpi_processor_load_module() used by the ACPI processor
driver can only really work if the acpi-cpufreq module is available
when acpi_processor_start() is executed which usually is not the case
for systems loading the processor driver module from an initramfs.

Moreover, that used to be a hackish workaround for module autoloading
issues, but udev loads acpi-cpufreq just fine nowadays, so that
function isn't really necessary any more.  For this reason, drop
acpi_processor_load_module() entirely.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Fixed a brace coding style issue. (Brace not on the good line)

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Rhéaume <mathieu@codingrhemes.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* acpi-processor:
  ACPI / processor: Acquire writer lock to update CPU maps
  ACPI / processor: Remove acpi_processor_get_limit_info()

acpi_processor_get_limit_info() is only called in the __acpi_processor_start()
and what it does actually is just to check pr->flags.throttling and set limit.
The pr pointer has been checked in the __acpi_processor_start() before
acpi_processor_get_limit_info() being called. It doesn't make sense still to
keep it as a function. So move code to __acpi_processor_start() and remove
acpi_processor_get_limit_info().

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It is quite some time that this one has been deprecated.
Get rid of it.

Should some really important user be overseen, it may be reverted and
the userspace program worked on first, but it is time to do something
to get rid of this old stuff...

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

This removes all the drivers/acpi uses of the __cpuinit macros
from all C files.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_INFO, ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_THROTTLING and
ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_LIMIT are used for procfs, but this feature was removed
in commit d09fe555 (ACPI processor: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/F) long
ago. So, these macros should also be removed.

ACPI_PROCESSOR_LIMIT_USER and ACPI_PROCESSOR_LIMIT_THERMAL are not used
by any code, remove them too.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>