linux-toradex.git/drivers/acpi/resource.c, branch v4.2.6 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules Merge branches 'pm-cpuidle', 'pm-cpufreq' and 'acpi-resources' 2015-07-16T21:47:19+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2015-07-16T21:47:19+00:00 17ffc8b083ac299ff798419d1887b7cdcd4ae4d2 * pm-cpuidle: suspend-to-idle: Prevent RCU from complaining about tick_freeze() * pm-cpufreq: cpufreq: Allow freq_table to be obtained for offline CPUs cpufreq: Initialize the governor again while restoring policy * acpi-resources: ACPI / PCI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel 
* pm-cpuidle:
  suspend-to-idle: Prevent RCU from complaining about tick_freeze()

* pm-cpufreq:
  cpufreq: Allow freq_table to be obtained for offline CPUs
  cpufreq: Initialize the governor again while restoring policy

* acpi-resources:
  ACPI / PCI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel
ACPI / PCI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel 2015-07-10T00:46:52+00:00 Jiang Liu jiang.liu@linux.intel.com 2015-07-08T07:26:39+00:00 1fb01ca93a1348a1469b8777326cd7632483de77 Zoltan Boszormenyi reported this regression: "There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID 1565:230e) network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded the IRQs in the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to power it down. The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this, either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back to the computer. The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was good." The regression is caused by commit 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation). Since commit 593669c2ac0f, x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver validates ACPI resources by first converting an ACPI resource to a 'struct resource' structure and then applying checks against the converted resource structure. The 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource' are defined to be type of resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits or 64 bits depending on CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32-bit kernels because 64-bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting to 32-bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. It eventually affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and makes some PCI devices and the system behave abnormally due to incorrect resource assignment. So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource descriptors with address/offset above 4G when running in 32-bit mode. With the fix applied, the behavior of the machine was restored to how 3.18.16 worked, i.e. the memory range that is over 4GB is ignored again, and lspci -vvxxx shows that everything is at the same memory window as they were with 3.18.16. Reported-and-tested-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu> Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation) Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Zoltan Boszormenyi reported this regression:
  "There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID
   1565:230e) network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded
   the IRQs in the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with
   considerable latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible.
   The machine responded to the power button but didn't actually power
   down. It just stuck at the powering down message. I had to press the
   power button for 4 seconds to power it down.

   The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this,
   either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting,
   the network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM
   announced itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat
   some sense back to the computer.

   The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was
   good."

The regression is caused by commit 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common
ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation). Since commit
593669c2ac0f, x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver validates ACPI resources by
first converting an ACPI resource to a 'struct resource' structure and
then applying checks against the converted resource structure. The 'start'
and 'end' fields in 'struct resource' are defined to be type of
resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits or 64 bits depending on
CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT.

This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32-bit kernels
because 64-bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting
to 32-bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. It eventually
affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and makes some PCI devices and
the system behave abnormally due to incorrect resource assignment.

So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource
descriptors with address/offset above 4G when running in 32-bit mode.

With the fix applied, the behavior of the machine was restored to how
3.18.16 worked, i.e. the memory range that is over 4GB is ignored again,
and lspci -vvxxx shows that everything is at the same memory window as
they were with 3.18.16.

Reported-and-tested-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu>
Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation)
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PNP: Reserve ACPI resources at the fs_initcall_sync stage 2015-07-06T21:52:21+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2015-07-04T01:09:03+00:00 0294112ee3135fbd15eaa70015af8283642dd970 This effectively reverts the following three commits: 7bc10388ccdd ACPI / resources: free memory on error in add_region_before() 0f1b414d1907 ACPI / PNP: Avoid conflicting resource reservations b9a5e5e18fbf ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources() (commit b9a5e5e18fbf introduced regressions some of which, but not all, were addressed by commit 0f1b414d1907 and commit 7bc10388ccdd was a fixup on top of the latter) and causes ACPI fixed hardware resources to be reserved at the fs_initcall_sync stage of system initialization. The story is as follows. First, a boot regression was reported due to an apparent resource reservation ordering change after a commit that shouldn't lead to such changes. Investigation led to the conclusion that the problem happened because acpi_reserve_resources() was executed at the device_initcall() stage of system initialization which wasn't strictly ordered with respect to driver initialization (and with respect to the initialization of the pcieport driver in particular), so a random change causing the device initcalls to be run in a different order might break things. The response to that was to attempt to run acpi_reserve_resources() as soon as we knew that ACPI would be in use (commit b9a5e5e18fbf). However, that turned out to be too early, because it caused resource reservations made by the PNP system driver to fail on at least one system and that failure was addressed by commit 0f1b414d1907. That fix still turned out to be insufficient, though, because calling acpi_reserve_resources() before the fs_initcall stage of system initialization caused a boot regression to happen on the eCAFE EC-800-H20G/S netbook. That meant that we only could call acpi_reserve_resources() at the fs_initcall initialization stage or later, but then we might just as well call it after the PNP initalization in which case commit 0f1b414d1907 wouldn't be necessary any more. For this reason, the changes made by commit 0f1b414d1907 are reverted (along with a memory leak fixup on top of that commit), the changes made by commit b9a5e5e18fbf that went too far are reverted too and acpi_reserve_resources() is changed into fs_initcall_sync, which will cause it to be executed after the PNP subsystem initialization (which is an fs_initcall) and before device initcalls (including the pcieport driver initialization) which should avoid the initial issue. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100581 Link: http://marc.info/?t=143092384600002&r=1&w=2 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99831 Link: http://marc.info/?t=143389402600001&r=1&w=2 Fixes: b9a5e5e18fbf "ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources()" Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
This effectively reverts the following three commits:

 7bc10388ccdd ACPI / resources: free memory on error in add_region_before()
 0f1b414d1907 ACPI / PNP: Avoid conflicting resource reservations
 b9a5e5e18fbf ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources()

(commit b9a5e5e18fbf introduced regressions some of which, but not
all, were addressed by commit 0f1b414d1907 and commit 7bc10388ccdd
was a fixup on top of the latter) and causes ACPI fixed hardware
resources to be reserved at the fs_initcall_sync stage of system
initialization.

The story is as follows.  First, a boot regression was reported due
to an apparent resource reservation ordering change after a commit
that shouldn't lead to such changes.  Investigation led to the
conclusion that the problem happened because acpi_reserve_resources()
was executed at the device_initcall() stage of system initialization
which wasn't strictly ordered with respect to driver initialization
(and with respect to the initialization of the pcieport driver in
particular), so a random change causing the device initcalls to be
run in a different order might break things.

The response to that was to attempt to run acpi_reserve_resources()
as soon as we knew that ACPI would be in use (commit b9a5e5e18fbf).
However, that turned out to be too early, because it caused resource
reservations made by the PNP system driver to fail on at least one
system and that failure was addressed by commit 0f1b414d1907.

That fix still turned out to be insufficient, though, because
calling acpi_reserve_resources() before the fs_initcall stage of
system initialization caused a boot regression to happen on the
eCAFE EC-800-H20G/S netbook.  That meant that we only could call
acpi_reserve_resources() at the fs_initcall initialization stage
or later, but then we might just as well call it after the PNP
initalization in which case commit 0f1b414d1907 wouldn't be
necessary any more.

For this reason, the changes made by commit 0f1b414d1907 are reverted
(along with a memory leak fixup on top of that commit), the changes
made by commit b9a5e5e18fbf that went too far are reverted too and
acpi_reserve_resources() is changed into fs_initcall_sync, which
will cause it to be executed after the PNP subsystem initialization
(which is an fs_initcall) and before device initcalls (including
the pcieport driver initialization) which should avoid the initial
issue.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
Link: http://marc.info/?t=143092384600002&r=1&w=2
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Link: http://marc.info/?t=143389402600001&r=1&w=2
Fixes: b9a5e5e18fbf "ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources()"
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / resources: free memory on error in add_region_before() 2015-06-24T17:52:34+00:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com 2015-06-24T14:30:15+00:00 7bc10388ccdd79b3d20463151a1f8e7a590a775b There is a small memory leak on error. Fixes: 0f1b414d1907 (ACPI / PNP: Avoid conflicting resource reservations) Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
There is a small memory leak on error.

Fixes: 0f1b414d1907 (ACPI / PNP: Avoid conflicting resource reservations)
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / PNP: Avoid conflicting resource reservations 2015-06-18T16:32:02+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2015-06-18T16:32:02+00:00 0f1b414d190724617eb1cdd615592fa8cd9d0b50 Commit b9a5e5e18fbf "ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources()" overlooked the fact that the memory and/or I/O regions reserved by acpi_reserve_resources() may conflict with those reserved by the PNP "system" driver. If that conflict actually takes place, it causes the reservations made by the "system" driver to fail while before commit b9a5e5e18fbf all reservations made by it and by acpi_reserve_resources() would be successful. In turn, that allows the resources that haven't been reserved by the "system" driver to be used by others (e.g. PCI) which sometimes leads to functional problems (up to and including boot failures). To fix that issue, introduce a common resource reservation routine, acpi_reserve_region(), to be used by both acpi_reserve_resources() and the "system" driver, that will track all resources reserved by it and avoid making conflicting requests. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99831 Link: http://marc.info/?t=143389402600001&r=1&w=2 Fixes: b9a5e5e18fbf "ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources()" Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Commit b9a5e5e18fbf "ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of
acpi_reserve_resources()" overlooked the fact that the memory
and/or I/O regions reserved by acpi_reserve_resources() may
conflict with those reserved by the PNP "system" driver.

If that conflict actually takes place, it causes the reservations
made by the "system" driver to fail while before commit b9a5e5e18fbf
all reservations made by it and by acpi_reserve_resources() would be
successful.  In turn, that allows the resources that haven't been
reserved by the "system" driver to be used by others (e.g. PCI) which
sometimes leads to functional problems (up to and including boot
failures).

To fix that issue, introduce a common resource reservation routine,
acpi_reserve_region(), to be used by both acpi_reserve_resources()
and the "system" driver, that will track all resources reserved by
it and avoid making conflicting requests.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Link: http://marc.info/?t=143389402600001&r=1&w=2
Fixes: b9a5e5e18fbf "ACPI / init: Fix the ordering of acpi_reserve_resources()"
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
x86/PCI/ACPI: Make all resources except [io 0xcf8-0xcff] available on PCI bus 2015-04-30T20:17:34+00:00 Jiang Liu jiang.liu@linux.intel.com 2015-04-30T04:41:28+00:00 2c62e8492ed7358bbe7da51666c7e0f6da9474ee An IO port or MMIO resource assigned to a PCI host bridge may be consumed by the host bridge itself or available to its child bus/devices. The ACPI specification defines a bit (Producer/Consumer) to tell whether the resource is consumed by the host bridge itself, but firmware hasn't used that bit consistently, so we can't rely on it. Before commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation"), arch/x86/pci/acpi.c ignored all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io and acpi_resource_fixed_io to filter out IO ports consumed by the host bridge itself. Commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation") started accepting all IO port and MMIO resources, which caused a regression that IO port resources consumed by the host bridge itself became available to its child devices. Then commit 63f1789ec716 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself") ignored resources consumed by the host bridge itself by checking the IORESOURCE_WINDOW flag, which accidently removed MMIO resources defined by acpi_resource_memory24, acpi_resource_memory32 and acpi_resource_fixed_memory32. On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO port and MMIO resources are assumed to be available to child bus/devices except one special case: IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by the host bridge itself to access PCI configuration space. So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF]. This solution will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host bridge common code from x86, ia64 and ARM64. Related ACPI table are archived at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221 Related discussions at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461633/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/29/304 Fixes: 63f1789ec716 (Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself) Reported-by: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
An IO port or MMIO resource assigned to a PCI host bridge may be
consumed by the host bridge itself or available to its child
bus/devices. The ACPI specification defines a bit (Producer/Consumer)
to tell whether the resource is consumed by the host bridge itself,
but firmware hasn't used that bit consistently, so we can't rely on it.

Before commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource
interfaces to simplify implementation"), arch/x86/pci/acpi.c ignored
all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io and
acpi_resource_fixed_io to filter out IO ports consumed by the host
bridge itself.

Commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces
to simplify implementation") started accepting all IO port and MMIO
resources, which caused a regression that IO port resources consumed
by the host bridge itself became available to its child devices.

Then commit 63f1789ec716 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by
host bridge itself") ignored resources consumed by the host bridge
itself by checking the IORESOURCE_WINDOW flag, which accidently removed
MMIO resources defined by acpi_resource_memory24, acpi_resource_memory32
and acpi_resource_fixed_memory32.

On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO port and MMIO resources are assumed
to be available to child bus/devices except one special case:
    IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by the host bridge itself
    to access PCI configuration space.

So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF]. This solution
will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host bridge common code
from x86, ia64 and ARM64.

Related ACPI table are archived at:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221

Related discussions at:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461633/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/29/304

Fixes: 63f1789ec716 (Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself)
Reported-by: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
x86/PCI/ACPI: Relax ACPI resource descriptor checks to work around BIOS bugs 2015-03-04T13:09:50+00:00 Jiang Liu jiang.liu@linux.intel.com 2015-03-04T08:47:12+00:00 aa714d286f2ea5fae3ca8c75acd03d8694fb657e Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors, so relax the checks to avoid regressions. This issue has appeared several times as: 3162b6f0c5e1 ("PNPACPI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1") d558b483d5a7 ("x86/PCI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1") f238b414a74a ("PNPACPI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN") 48728e077480 ("x86/PCI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN") Please refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221 for more details and example malformed ACPI resource descriptors. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221 Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces ...) Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Tested-by: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors,
so relax the checks to avoid regressions. This issue has appeared several
times as:
 3162b6f0c5e1 ("PNPACPI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1")
 d558b483d5a7 ("x86/PCI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1")
 f238b414a74a ("PNPACPI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN")
 48728e077480 ("x86/PCI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN")

Please refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221
for more details and example malformed ACPI resource descriptors.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221
Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces ...)
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI / resources: Change pr_info() to pr_debug() for debug information 2015-02-18T07:05:43+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2015-02-18T07:05:43+00:00 6a239af2a3698c488aee798670eca772eb74890b Annoying and noisy ACPI debug messages are printed with pr_info() after the recent ACPI resources handling rework. Replace the pr_info() with pr_debug() to reduce to noise level. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Annoying and noisy ACPI debug messages are printed with pr_info()
after the recent ACPI resources handling rework.  Replace the
pr_info() with pr_debug() to reduce to noise level.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
resources: Move struct resource_list_entry from ACPI into resource core 2015-02-05T14:09:25+00:00 Jiang Liu jiang.liu@linux.intel.com 2015-02-05T05:44:43+00:00 90e97820619dc912b52cc9d103272819d8b51259 Currently ACPI, PCI and pnp all implement the same resource list management with different data structure. We need to transfer from one data structure into another when passing resources from one subsystem into another subsystem. So move struct resource_list_entry from ACPI into resource core and rename it as resource_entry, then it could be reused by different subystems and avoid the data structure conversion. Introduce dedicated header file resource_ext.h instead of embedding it into ioport.h to avoid header file inclusion order issues. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Currently ACPI, PCI and pnp all implement the same resource list
management with different data structure. We need to transfer from
one data structure into another when passing resources from one
subsystem into another subsystem. So move struct resource_list_entry
from ACPI into resource core and rename it as resource_entry,
then it could be reused by different subystems and avoid the data
structure conversion.

Introduce dedicated header file resource_ext.h instead of embedding
it into ioport.h to avoid header file inclusion order issues.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI: Introduce helper function acpi_dev_filter_resource_type() 2015-02-03T21:27:23+00:00 Jiang Liu jiang.liu@linux.intel.com 2015-02-02T02:43:01+00:00 62d1141ff34e35de496ba06491c8e854b23b3f3e Introduce helper function acpi_dev_filter_resource_type(), which may be used by acpi_dev_get_resources() to filer out resource based on resource type. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
Introduce helper function acpi_dev_filter_resource_type(), which may
be used by acpi_dev_get_resources() to filer out resource based on
resource type.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>