* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / hotplug: Fix conflicted PCI bridge notify handlers

* acpi-sysfs:
  ACPI / sysfs: Fix incorrect ACPI tables walk in acpi_tables_sysfs_init()
  ACPI / sysfs: Set file size for each exposed ACPI table

* acpi-sleep:
  ACPI / sleep: clean up compiler warning about uninitialized field

The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler,
handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself.  Nevertheless, the ACPI
hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler,
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges.  This causes
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported
error as hotplug.enabled is not set.

To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which
indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by
itself.  The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common
notify handler when this flag is set.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
[rjw: Changed the name of the new flag]
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / scan: Set flags.match_driver in acpi_bus_scan_fixed()
  ACPI / PCI root: Clear driver_data before failing enumeration
  ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removal
  ACPI / hotplug: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() return value check

Before commit 6931007cc90b (ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers
after trying scan handlers) the match_driver flag for all devices
was set in acpi_add_single_object(), but now it is set by
acpi_bus_device_attach() which is not called for the "fixed"
devices added by acpi_bus_scan_fixed().  This means that
flags.match_driver is never set for those devices now, so make
acpi_bus_scan_fixed() set it before calling device_attach().

Fixes: 6931007cc90b (ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set hotplug.enabled,
the check of it in acpi_bus_device_eject() effectively prevents the
root bridge hot removal from working after commit a3b1b1ef78cd
(ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines).  However, that
check is not necessary, because the other acpi_bus_device_eject()
users, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb and acpi_eject_store(), do the same
check by themselves before executing that function.

For this reason, remove the scan handler check from
acpi_bus_device_eject() to make PCI hot bridge hot removal work
again.

Fixes: a3b1b1ef78cd (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Since acpi_bus_get_device() returns a plain int and not acpi_status,
ACPI_FAILURE() should not be used for checking its return value.  Fix
that.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines
  ACPI / hotplug: Do not execute "insert in progress" _OST
  ACPI / hotplug: Carry out PCI root eject directly
  ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines
  ACPI / hotplug: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() internal
  ACPI / hotplug: Simplify device ejection routines
  ACPI / hotplug: Fix handle_root_bridge_removal()
  ACPI / hotplug: Refuse to hot-remove all objects with disabled hotplug
  ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers
  ACPI: Remove acpi_pci_slot_init() headers from internal.h

Conflicts:
	include/acpi/acpiosxf.h (with the 'acpica' branch)

There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the
ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host
bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common
ACPI hotplug code and docking stations.  They both are somewhat
cumbersome to use and work slightly differently.

The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that
will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work
object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that
object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work
function with one more argument and let the interface take care of
the execution details.

The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the
fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function
pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of
the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to
pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been
constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute().

Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory
allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are
always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute().  Also,
acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event
workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas
alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar.  That leads to
somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI
hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up.

For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and
acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface,
acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more
friendly to its users than any of the two.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

According to the ACPI spec (5.0, Section 6.3.5), the "Device
insertion in progress (pending)" (0x80) _OST status code is
reserved for the "Insertion Processing" (0x200) source event
which is "a result of an OSPM action".  Specifically, it is not
a notification, so that status code should not be used during
notification processing, which unfortunately is done by
acpi_scan_bus_device_check().

For this reason, drop the ACPI_OST_SC_INSERT_IN_PROGRESS _OST
status evaluation from there (it was a mistake to put it in there
in the first place).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Since _handle_hotplug_event_root() is run from the ACPI hotplug
workqueue, it doesn't need to queue up a work item to eject a PCI
host bridge on the same workqueue.  Instead, it can just carry out
the eject by calling acpi_bus_device_eject() directly, so make that
happen.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>