commit b7e383046c2c7c13ad928cd7407eafff758ddd4b upstream.

When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled.
But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off.

A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability for S5.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

commit 4f5f64cf0cc916220aaa055992e31195470cfe37 upstream.

At one point acpi_device_set_id() checks if acpi_device_hid(device)
returns NULL, but that never happens, so system bus devices with an
empty list of PNP IDs are given the dummy HID ("device") instead of
the "system bus HID" ("LNXSYBUS").  Fix the code to use the right
check.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

 Use kstrdup rather than duplicating its implementation

 The semantic patch that makes this output is available
 in scripts/coccinelle/api/kstrdup.cocci.

 More information about semantic patching is available at
 http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/

Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There is at least one BIOS with a DSDT containing a power resource
object with a _PR0 entry pointing back to that power resource.  In
consequence, while registering that power resource
acpi_bus_get_power_flags() sees that it depends on itself and tries
to register it again, which leads to an infinitely deep recurrence.
This problem was introduced by commit bf325f9538d8c89312be305b9779e
(ACPI / PM: Register power resource devices as soon as they are
needed).

To fix this problem use the observation that power resources cannot
be power manageable and prevent acpi_bus_get_power_flags() from
being called for power resource objects.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31872
Reported-and-tested-by: Pascal Dormeau <pdormeau@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
generating wakeup signals more than once in a row.  However, it
really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
threads for the same device.

Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is
only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is
present for the given device.  That information is only used by
acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call
acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped
if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags().
Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0,
so it really should be void.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Before evaluating _PRW for devices that are reported as inactive or
not present by their _STA control methods we should check if those
methods are actually present (otherwise the evaulation of _PRW will
obviously fail and a scary message will be printed unnecessarily).

Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Reported-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Depending on the organization of the ACPI namespace, power resource
device objects may generally be scanned after the "regular" device
objects that they are referred from through _PRn.  This, in turn, may
cause acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to attempt to access them through
acpi_bus_init_power() before they are registered (and initialized by
acpi_power_driver).  [This is not a theoretical issue, it actually
happens for one PnP device on my testbed HP nx6325.]

To fix this problem, make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() attempt to
register power resource devices as soon as they have been found in
the _PRn output for any other devices.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>