[ Upstream commit a578884fa0d2768f13d37c6591a9e1ed600482d3 ]

Without the Kconfig dependency, we can get this warning:

warning: ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ selects ACPI_CPPC_LIB which has unmet direct dependencies (ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR)

Fixes: 5477fb3bd1e8 (ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC)
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The cpufreq-dt-platdev driver supports creation of cpufreq-dt platform
device now, reuse that and remove similar code from platform code.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The MT8173 cpufreq driver can currently only be built-in, but
it has a Kconfig dependency on the thermal core. THERMAL
can be a loadable module, which in turn makes this driver
impossible to build.

It is nicer to make the cpufreq driver a module as well, so
this patch turns the option in to a 'tristate' and adapts
the dependency accordingly.

The driver has no module_exit() function, so it will continue
to not support unloading, but it can be built as a module
and loaded at runtime now.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 5269e7067cd6 (cpufreq: Add ARM_MT8173_CPUFREQ dependency on THERMAL)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The bootloader is charged with the responsibility to provide platform
specific Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) information via
Device Tree.  This driver takes the supplied configuration and
registers it with the new generic OPP framework, to then be used with
CPUFreq.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This driver is the only one that calls regulator_sync_voltage(), but it
can currently be built with CONFIG_REGULATOR disabled, producing
this build error:

drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c: In function 'tegra124_cpu_switch_to_pllx':
drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c:68:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'regulator_sync_voltage' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  regulator_sync_voltage(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);

My first attempt was to implement a helper for this function
for regulator_sync_voltage, but Mark Brown explained:

   We don't do this for *all* regulator API functions - there's some where
   using them strongly suggests that there is actually a dependency on
   the regulator API.  This does seem like it might be falling into the
   specialist category [...]
   Looking at the code I'm pretty unclear on what the authors think the
   use of _sync_voltage() is doing in the first place so it may be even
   better to just remove the call.  It seems to have been included in the
   first commit so there's not changelog explaining things and there's
   no comment either.  I'd *expect* it to be a noop as far as I can see.

This adds the dependency to make the driver always build successfully
or not be enabled at all. Alternatively, we could investigate if the
driver should stop calling regulator_sync_voltage instead.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on
big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power
coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support
the extensions that allow it to be used with all the existing thermal
governors including the power allocator governor.

A cooling device will be created per individual frequency domain and
can be bound to thermal zones via the thermal DT bindings.

Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The SCPI clk driver registers the virtual cpufreq device that kicks off
initialisation of the SCPI cpufreq driver. Also, clk_get() will fail for
the cpufreq driver if the SCPI clk driver is missing.

Fix this by making the SCPI cpufreq driver explicitly depend on the SCPI
clk driver.

Fixes: 8def31034d03 (cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver)
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* pm-cpufreq:
  Revert "Documentation: kernel_parameters for Intel P state driver"
  cpufreq: mediatek: fix build error
  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add separate support for Airmont cores
  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace BYT with ATOM
  Revert "cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use ACPI perf configuration"
  Revert "cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid calculation for max/min"

* acpi-cppc:
  ACPI / CPPC: Use h/w reduced version of the PCCT structure

The recently added mt8173 cpufreq driver relies on the cpu topology
that is always present on ARM64 but optional on ARM32:

drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c: In function 'mtk_cpufreq_init':
drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c:441:30: error: 'cpu_topology' undeclared (first use in this function)
  cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &cpu_topology[policy->cpu].core_sibling);

This refines the Kconfig dependencies so that we can still build on
ARM32, but only if COMPILE_TEST is selected and the CPU topology
code is present.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>