linux-toradex.git/drivers/dma-buf, branch v4.10 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules Revert "dma-buf/sync-file: Avoid enable fence signaling if poll(.timeout=0)" 2016-11-18T09:35:58+00:00 Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk 2016-11-18T08:26:43+00:00 069cad6d02fef7924fb942b37a6c17dd02a79f7f This reverts commit ecebca79f6976ddaddfd054d699272515869ea28. Do not enable fence callback on poll() when using fence_array causes the fence_array to not signal. For now we will revert the change and enable signaling everytime time poll is called with timeout=0 as well. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479457603-30758-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org 
This reverts commit ecebca79f6976ddaddfd054d699272515869ea28.

Do not enable fence callback on poll() when using fence_array causes the
fence_array to not signal.

For now we will revert the change and enable signaling everytime time
poll is called with timeout=0 as well.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479457603-30758-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org
reservation: revert "wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)" v2 2016-11-08T19:18:57+00:00 Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com 2016-11-07T21:16:16+00:00 06a66b5c77ede71f0601f4710284ca1076e673fa Reverts commit fb8b7d2b9d80 ("reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)") Otherwise signaling might never be activated on the fences. This can result in infinite waiting with hardware which has unreliable interrupts. v2: still return one when the timeout is zero and we don't have any fences. Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> (v1) Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> [sumits: fix checkpatch warnings] Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-4-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
Reverts commit fb8b7d2b9d80
	("reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)")

Otherwise signaling might never be activated on the fences. This can
result in infinite waiting with hardware which has unreliable interrupts.

v2: still return one when the timeout is zero and we don't have any fences.

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
  [sumits: fix checkpatch warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-4-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
dma-buf/fence: revert "don't wait when specified timeout is zero" (v2) 2016-11-08T19:15:33+00:00 Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com 2016-11-07T21:16:14+00:00 698c0f7ff21674ec08a4c6e99dd6da62fe5a344d Reverts commit 847b19a39e4c ("dma-buf/fence: don't wait when specified timeout is zero") When we don't call the wait function software signaling might never be activated. This can cause infinite polling loops with unreliable interrupt driven hardware. v2: rebase on drm-next Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> [sumits: reword commit msg for checkpatch warnings] Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-2-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
Reverts commit 847b19a39e4c
	("dma-buf/fence: don't wait when specified timeout is zero")

When we don't call the wait function software signaling might never be
activated. This can cause infinite polling loops with unreliable interrupt
driven hardware.

v2: rebase on drm-next

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
  [sumits: reword commit msg for checkpatch warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-2-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
dma-buf/fence: make timeout handling in fence_default_wait consistent (v2) 2016-11-08T19:15:14+00:00 Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com 2016-11-07T21:16:13+00:00 bcc004b629d22ae202988e4c5424564e0b4f1217 Kernel functions taking a timeout usually return 1 on success even when they get a zero timeout. v2: agd: rebase on drm-next Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-1-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
Kernel functions taking a timeout usually return 1 on success even
when they get a zero timeout.

v2: agd: rebase on drm-next

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-1-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
dma-buf: return index of the first signaled fence (v2) 2016-11-08T18:42:00+00:00 monk.liu monk.liu@amd.com 2016-11-04T20:16:09+00:00 7392b4bb702b05749539ff0936e94976248240c9 Return the index of the first signaled fence. This information is useful in some APIs like Vulkan. v2: rebase on drm-next (fence -> dma_fence) Signed-off-by: monk.liu <monk.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> [sumits: fix warnings] Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478290570-30982-1-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
Return the index of the first signaled fence.  This information
is useful in some APIs like Vulkan.

v2: rebase on drm-next (fence -> dma_fence)

Signed-off-by: monk.liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
 [sumits: fix warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478290570-30982-1-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
dma-buf/sw_sync: put fence reference from the fence creation 2016-11-08T18:27:40+00:00 Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk 2016-10-26T20:59:59+00:00 4592bfcd177fe78cf9adc59f2dcddd1fa1f71079 Once sw_sync_ioctl_create_fence() returns we no longer have the *pt pointer to the fence base object thus we need to put the reference we have from the fence creation to keep a correct reference accounting. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477515599-7685-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org 
Once sw_sync_ioctl_create_fence() returns we no longer have the
*pt pointer to the fence base object thus we need to put the reference
we have from the fence creation to keep a correct reference accounting.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477515599-7685-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org
dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static 2016-11-08T17:34:57+00:00 Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org 2016-09-18T12:49:21+00:00 748815881f7824b489d63a8cd8a4e27ef14c303b We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'. Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474202961-10099-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org 
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks it 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474202961-10099-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org
dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fence 2016-10-25T12:40:39+00:00 Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk 2016-10-25T12:00:45+00:00 f54d1867005c3323f5d8ad83eed823e84226c429 I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA operations to make room. A consensus was reached in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it remains a good thing! (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch) v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke. v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel coccinelle script: @@ @@ - struct fence + struct dma_fence @@ @@ - struct fence_ops + struct dma_fence_ops @@ @@ - struct fence_cb + struct dma_fence_cb @@ @@ - struct fence_array + struct dma_fence_array @@ @@ - enum fence_flag_bits + enum dma_fence_flag_bits @@ @@ ( - fence_init + dma_fence_init | - fence_release + dma_fence_release | - fence_free + dma_fence_free | - fence_get + dma_fence_get | - fence_get_rcu + dma_fence_get_rcu | - fence_put + dma_fence_put | - fence_signal + dma_fence_signal | - fence_signal_locked + dma_fence_signal_locked | - fence_default_wait + dma_fence_default_wait | - fence_add_callback + dma_fence_add_callback | - fence_remove_callback + dma_fence_remove_callback | - fence_enable_sw_signaling + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling | - fence_is_signaled_locked + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked | - fence_is_signaled + dma_fence_is_signaled | - fence_is_later + dma_fence_is_later | - fence_later + dma_fence_later | - fence_wait_timeout + dma_fence_wait_timeout | - fence_wait_any_timeout + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout | - fence_wait + dma_fence_wait | - fence_context_alloc + dma_fence_context_alloc | - fence_array_create + dma_fence_array_create | - to_fence_array + to_dma_fence_array | - fence_is_array + dma_fence_is_array | - trace_fence_emit + trace_dma_fence_emit | - FENCE_TRACE + DMA_FENCE_TRACE | - FENCE_WARN + DMA_FENCE_WARN | - FENCE_ERR + DMA_FENCE_ERR ) ( ... ) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk 
I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct,
and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA
operations to make room.

A consensus was reached in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html
that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing.
Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it
remains a good thing!

(v2...: rebase, rerun spatch)
v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke.
v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel

coccinelle script:
@@

@@
- struct fence
+ struct dma_fence
@@

@@
- struct fence_ops
+ struct dma_fence_ops
@@

@@
- struct fence_cb
+ struct dma_fence_cb
@@

@@
- struct fence_array
+ struct dma_fence_array
@@

@@
- enum fence_flag_bits
+ enum dma_fence_flag_bits
@@

@@
(
- fence_init
+ dma_fence_init
|
- fence_release
+ dma_fence_release
|
- fence_free
+ dma_fence_free
|
- fence_get
+ dma_fence_get
|
- fence_get_rcu
+ dma_fence_get_rcu
|
- fence_put
+ dma_fence_put
|
- fence_signal
+ dma_fence_signal
|
- fence_signal_locked
+ dma_fence_signal_locked
|
- fence_default_wait
+ dma_fence_default_wait
|
- fence_add_callback
+ dma_fence_add_callback
|
- fence_remove_callback
+ dma_fence_remove_callback
|
- fence_enable_sw_signaling
+ dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling
|
- fence_is_signaled_locked
+ dma_fence_is_signaled_locked
|
- fence_is_signaled
+ dma_fence_is_signaled
|
- fence_is_later
+ dma_fence_is_later
|
- fence_later
+ dma_fence_later
|
- fence_wait_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_timeout
|
- fence_wait_any_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout
|
- fence_wait
+ dma_fence_wait
|
- fence_context_alloc
+ dma_fence_context_alloc
|
- fence_array_create
+ dma_fence_array_create
|
- to_fence_array
+ to_dma_fence_array
|
- fence_is_array
+ dma_fence_is_array
|
- trace_fence_emit
+ trace_dma_fence_emit
|
- FENCE_TRACE
+ DMA_FENCE_TRACE
|
- FENCE_WARN
+ DMA_FENCE_WARN
|
- FENCE_ERR
+ DMA_FENCE_ERR
)
 (
 ...
 )

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Merge remote-tracking branch 'airlied/drm-next' into topic/drm-misc 2016-10-25T08:06:04+00:00 Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch 2016-10-25T08:06:04+00:00 0fc4f78f44e6c6148cee32456f0d0023ec1c1fd8 Backmerge latest drm-next to have a baseline for the s/fence/dma_fence/ patch from Chris. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> 
Backmerge latest drm-next to have a baseline for the
s/fence/dma_fence/ patch from Chris.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
dma-buf/fence: add an lockdep_assert_held() 2016-10-25T06:54:09+00:00 Rob Clark robdclark@gmail.com 2016-10-24T19:57:10+00:00 78010cd9736ec571796f4404524ed575b81238b9 Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477339030-32657-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com 
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477339030-32657-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com