linux-toradex.git/drivers/gpu/drm, branch v5.6-rc6 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules Merge tag 'topic/mst-bw-check-fixes-for-airlied-2020-03-12-2' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc into drm-fixes 2020-03-13T00:38:25+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2020-03-13T00:38:24+00:00 16b78f052d0129cd2998305480da6c4e3ac220a8 UAPI Changes: None Cross-subsystem Changes: None Core Changes: Fixed regressions introduced by commit cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check"), which would cause us to: * Calculate the available bandwidth on an MST topology incorrectly, and as a result reject most display configurations that would try to enable more then one sink on a topology * Occasionally expose MST connectors to userspace before finishing probing their PBN capabilities, resulting in us rejecting display configurations because we assumed briefly that no bandwidth was available Driver Changes: None Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/bf16ee577567beed91c86b7d9cda3ec2e8c50a71.camel@redhat.com 
UAPI Changes: None

Cross-subsystem Changes: None

Core Changes: Fixed regressions introduced by commit cd82d82cbc04
("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check"),
which would cause us to:

* Calculate the available bandwidth on an MST topology incorrectly, and
  as a result reject most display configurations that would try to enable
  more then one sink on a topology
* Occasionally expose MST connectors to userspace before finishing
  probing their PBN capabilities, resulting in us rejecting display
  configurations because we assumed briefly that no bandwidth was
  available

Driver Changes: None

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/bf16ee577567beed91c86b7d9cda3ec2e8c50a71.camel@redhat.com
Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2020-03-12' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-fixes 2020-03-12T23:41:30+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2020-03-12T23:41:15+00:00 f31d83f047e190bc636505e9b9c31a34e25bfebe drm/i915 fixes for v5.6-rc6: - hard lockup fix - GVT fixes - 32-bit alignment issue fix - timeline wait fixes - cacheline_retire and free Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87lfo6ksvw.fsf@intel.com 
drm/i915 fixes for v5.6-rc6:
- hard lockup fix
- GVT fixes
- 32-bit alignment issue fix
- timeline wait fixes
- cacheline_retire and free

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87lfo6ksvw.fsf@intel.com
Merge tag 'amd-drm-fixes-5.6-2020-03-11' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-fixes 2020-03-12T23:22:28+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2020-03-12T23:22:25+00:00 d94432653519031f89d2a30cc917e29a02f0200d amd-drm-fixes-5.6-2020-03-11: amdgpu: - Update the display watermark bounding box for navi14 - Fix fetching vbios directly from rom on vega20/arcturus - Navi and renoir watermark fixes Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200312020924.4161-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
amd-drm-fixes-5.6-2020-03-11:

amdgpu:
- Update the display watermark bounding box for navi14
- Fix fetching vbios directly from rom on vega20/arcturus
- Navi and renoir watermark fixes

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200312020924.4161-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
drm/dp_mst: Rewrite and fix bandwidth limit checks 2020-03-12T23:07:49+00:00 Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com 2020-03-09T21:01:31+00:00 047d4cd2067b028e7bca906c5ce20f4c89b65386 Sigh, this is mostly my fault for not giving commit cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") enough scrutiny during review. The way we're checking bandwidth limitations here is mostly wrong: For starters, drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit() determines the pbn_limit of a branch by simply scanning each port on the current branch device, then uses the last non-zero full_pbn value that it finds. It then counts the sum of the PBN used on each branch device for that level, and compares against the full_pbn value it found before. This is wrong because ports can and will have different PBN limitations on many hubs, especially since a number of DisplayPort hubs out there will be clever and only use the smallest link rate required for each downstream sink - potentially giving every port a different full_pbn value depending on what link rate it's trained at. This means with our current code, which max PBN value we end up with is not well defined. Additionally, we also need to remember when checking bandwidth limitations that the top-most device in any MST topology is a branch device, not a port. This means that the first level of a topology doesn't technically have a full_pbn value that needs to be checked. Instead, we should assume that so long as our VCPI allocations fit we're within the bandwidth limitations of the primary MSTB. We do however, want to check full_pbn on every port including those of the primary MSTB. However, it's important to keep in mind that this value represents the minimum link rate /between a port's sink or mstb, and the mstb itself/. A quick diagram to explain: MSTB #1 / \ / \ Port #1 Port #2 full_pbn for Port #1 → | | ← full_pbn for Port #2 Sink #1 MSTB #2 | etc... Note that in the above diagram, the combined PBN from all VCPI allocations on said hub should not exceed the full_pbn value of port #2, and the display configuration on sink #1 should not exceed the full_pbn value of port #1. However, port #1 and port #2 can otherwise consume as much bandwidth as they want so long as their VCPI allocations still fit. And finally - our current bandwidth checking code also makes the mistake of not checking whether something is an end device or not before trying to traverse down it. So, let's fix it by rewriting our bandwidth checking helpers. We split the function into one part for handling branches which simply adds up the total PBN on each branch and returns it, and one for checking each port to ensure we're not going over its PBN limit. Phew. This should fix regressions seen, where we erroneously reject display configurations due to thinking they're going over our bandwidth limits when they're not. Changes since v1: * Took an even closer look at how PBN limitations are supposed to be handled, and did some experimenting with Sean Paul. Ended up rewriting these helpers again, but this time they should actually be correct! Changes since v2: * Small indenting fix * Fix pbn_used check in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@google.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200309210131.1497545-1-lyude@redhat.com 
Sigh, this is mostly my fault for not giving commit cd82d82cbc04
("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check")
enough scrutiny during review. The way we're checking bandwidth
limitations here is mostly wrong:

For starters, drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit() determines the
pbn_limit of a branch by simply scanning each port on the current branch
device, then uses the last non-zero full_pbn value that it finds. It
then counts the sum of the PBN used on each branch device for that
level, and compares against the full_pbn value it found before.

This is wrong because ports can and will have different PBN limitations
on many hubs, especially since a number of DisplayPort hubs out there
will be clever and only use the smallest link rate required for each
downstream sink - potentially giving every port a different full_pbn
value depending on what link rate it's trained at. This means with our
current code, which max PBN value we end up with is not well defined.

Additionally, we also need to remember when checking bandwidth
limitations that the top-most device in any MST topology is a branch
device, not a port. This means that the first level of a topology
doesn't technically have a full_pbn value that needs to be checked.
Instead, we should assume that so long as our VCPI allocations fit we're
within the bandwidth limitations of the primary MSTB.

We do however, want to check full_pbn on every port including those of
the primary MSTB. However, it's important to keep in mind that this
value represents the minimum link rate /between a port's sink or mstb,
and the mstb itself/. A quick diagram to explain:

                                MSTB #1
                               /       \
                              /         \
                           Port #1    Port #2
       full_pbn for Port #1 → |          | ← full_pbn for Port #2
                           Sink #1    MSTB #2
                                         |
                                       etc...

Note that in the above diagram, the combined PBN from all VCPI
allocations on said hub should not exceed the full_pbn value of port #2,
and the display configuration on sink #1 should not exceed the full_pbn
value of port #1. However, port #1 and port #2 can otherwise consume as
much bandwidth as they want so long as their VCPI allocations still fit.

And finally - our current bandwidth checking code also makes the mistake
of not checking whether something is an end device or not before trying
to traverse down it.

So, let's fix it by rewriting our bandwidth checking helpers. We split
the function into one part for handling branches which simply adds up
the total PBN on each branch and returns it, and one for checking each
port to ensure we're not going over its PBN limit. Phew.

This should fix regressions seen, where we erroneously reject display
configurations due to thinking they're going over our bandwidth limits
when they're not.

Changes since v1:
* Took an even closer look at how PBN limitations are supposed to be
  handled, and did some experimenting with Sean Paul. Ended up rewriting
  these helpers again, but this time they should actually be correct!
Changes since v2:
* Small indenting fix
* Fix pbn_used check in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit()

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check")
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@google.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200309210131.1497545-1-lyude@redhat.com
drm/dp_mst: Reprobe path resources in CSN handler 2020-03-12T23:07:24+00:00 Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com 2020-03-06T23:46:21+00:00 87212b51bff02a6722d5e84f7842a6b0717eb7d4 We used to punt off reprobing path resources to the link address probe work, but now that we handle CSNs asynchronously from the driver's HPD handling we can do whatever the heck we want from the CSN! So, reprobe the path resources from drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(). Also, get rid of the path resource reprobing code in drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address() since it's needlessly complicated when we already reprobe path resources from drm_dp_handle_link_address_port(). And finally, teach drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources() to return 1 on PBN changes so we know if we need to send another hotplug or not. This fixes issues where we've indicated to userspace that a port has just been connected, before we actually probed it's available PBN - something that results in unexpected atomic check failures. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234623.547525-4-lyude@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
We used to punt off reprobing path resources to the link address probe
work, but now that we handle CSNs asynchronously from the driver's HPD
handling we can do whatever the heck we want from the CSN!

So, reprobe the path resources from drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(). Also,
get rid of the path resource reprobing code in
drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address() since it's needlessly complicated
when we already reprobe path resources from
drm_dp_handle_link_address_port(). And finally, teach
drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources() to return 1 on PBN changes so we know
if we need to send another hotplug or not.

This fixes issues where we've indicated to userspace that a port has
just been connected, before we actually probed it's available PBN -
something that results in unexpected atomic check failures.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check")
Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234623.547525-4-lyude@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
drm/dp_mst: Use full_pbn instead of available_pbn for bandwidth checks 2020-03-12T23:07:24+00:00 Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com 2020-03-06T23:46:20+00:00 fcf4638075964268bf8a0e212407096c6aab6fd3 DisplayPort specifications are fun. For a while, it's been really unclear to us what available_pbn actually does. There's a somewhat vague explanation in the DisplayPort spec (starting from 1.2) that partially explains it: The minimum payload bandwidth number supported by the path. Each node updates this number with its available payload bandwidth number if its payload bandwidth number is less than that in the Message Transaction reply. So, it sounds like available_pbn represents the smallest link rate in use between the source and the branch device. Cool, so full_pbn is just the highest possible PBN that the branch device supports right? Well, we assumed that for quite a while until Sean Paul noticed that on some MST hubs, available_pbn will actually get set to 0 whenever there's any active payloads on the respective branch device. This caused quite a bit of confusion since clearing the payload ID table would end up fixing the available_pbn value. So, we just went with that until commit cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") started breaking people's setups due to us getting erroneous available_pbn values. So, we did some more digging and got confused until we finally looked at the definition for full_pbn: The bandwidth of the link at the trained link rate and lane count between the DP Source device and the DP Sink device with no time slots allocated to VC Payloads, represented as a Payload Bandwidth Number. As with the Available_Payload_Bandwidth_Number, this number is determined by the link with the lowest lane count and link rate. That's what we get for not reading specs closely enough, hehe. So, since full_pbn is definitely what we want for doing bandwidth restriction checks - let's start using that instead and ignore available_pbn entirely. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234623.547525-3-lyude@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
DisplayPort specifications are fun. For a while, it's been really
unclear to us what available_pbn actually does. There's a somewhat vague
explanation in the DisplayPort spec (starting from 1.2) that partially
explains it:

  The minimum payload bandwidth number supported by the path. Each node
  updates this number with its available payload bandwidth number if its
  payload bandwidth number is less than that in the Message Transaction
  reply.

So, it sounds like available_pbn represents the smallest link rate in
use between the source and the branch device. Cool, so full_pbn is just
the highest possible PBN that the branch device supports right?

Well, we assumed that for quite a while until Sean Paul noticed that on
some MST hubs, available_pbn will actually get set to 0 whenever there's
any active payloads on the respective branch device. This caused quite a
bit of confusion since clearing the payload ID table would end up fixing
the available_pbn value.

So, we just went with that until commit cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add
branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") started breaking
people's setups due to us getting erroneous available_pbn values. So, we
did some more digging and got confused until we finally looked at the
definition for full_pbn:

  The bandwidth of the link at the trained link rate and lane count
  between the DP Source device and the DP Sink device with no time slots
  allocated to VC Payloads, represented as a Payload Bandwidth Number. As
  with the Available_Payload_Bandwidth_Number, this number is determined
  by the link with the lowest lane count and link rate.

That's what we get for not reading specs closely enough, hehe. So, since
full_pbn is definitely what we want for doing bandwidth restriction
checks - let's start using that instead and ignore available_pbn
entirely.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check")
Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234623.547525-3-lyude@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
drm/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device() to be less redundant 2020-03-12T23:07:19+00:00 Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com 2020-03-06T23:46:19+00:00 b2feb1d6d34844c5c56eb34008c3e516664c5410 It's already prefixed by dp_mst, so we don't really need to repeat ourselves here. One of the changes I should have picked up originally when reviewing MST DSC support. There should be no functional changes here Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@google.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234623.547525-2-lyude@redhat.com 
It's already prefixed by dp_mst, so we don't really need to repeat
ourselves here. One of the changes I should have picked up originally
when reviewing MST DSC support.

There should be no functional changes here

Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@google.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234623.547525-2-lyude@redhat.com
drm/i915: Defer semaphore priority bumping to a workqueue 2020-03-11T21:12:39+00:00 Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk 2020-03-10T10:17:20+00:00 14a0d527a479eb2cb6067f9e5e163e1bf35db2a9 Since the semaphore fence may be signaled from inside an interrupt handler from inside a request holding its request->lock, we cannot then enter into the engine->active.lock for processing the semaphore priority bump as we may traverse our call tree and end up on another held request. CPU 0: [ 2243.218864] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9a/0xb0 [ 2243.218867] i915_schedule_bump_priority+0x49/0x80 [i915] [ 2243.218869] semaphore_notify+0x6d/0x98 [i915] [ 2243.218871] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915] [ 2243.218874] ? kmem_cache_free+0x211/0x290 [ 2243.218876] i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915] [ 2243.218879] dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x3e/0x80 [i915] [ 2243.218881] signal_irq_work+0x571/0x690 [i915] [ 2243.218883] irq_work_run_list+0xd7/0x120 [ 2243.218885] irq_work_run+0x1d/0x50 [ 2243.218887] smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x21/0x30 [ 2243.218889] irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20 CPU 1: [ 2242.173107] _raw_spin_lock+0x8f/0xa0 [ 2242.173110] __i915_request_submit+0x64/0x4a0 [i915] [ 2242.173112] __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x8ee/0x2120 [i915] [ 2242.173114] ? i915_sched_lookup_priolist+0x1e3/0x2b0 [i915] [ 2242.173117] execlists_submit_request+0x2e8/0x2f0 [i915] [ 2242.173119] submit_notify+0x8f/0xc0 [i915] [ 2242.173121] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915] [ 2242.173124] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40 [ 2242.173137] i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915] [ 2242.173140] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x16/0x20 [i915] Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1318 Fixes: b7404c7ecb38 ("drm/i915: Bump ready tasks ahead of busywaits") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310101720.9944-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 209df10bb4536c81c2540df96c02cd079435357f) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> 
Since the semaphore fence may be signaled from inside an interrupt
handler from inside a request holding its request->lock, we cannot then
enter into the engine->active.lock for processing the semaphore priority
bump as we may traverse our call tree and end up on another held
request.

CPU 0:
[ 2243.218864]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9a/0xb0
[ 2243.218867]  i915_schedule_bump_priority+0x49/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218869]  semaphore_notify+0x6d/0x98 [i915]
[ 2243.218871]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915]
[ 2243.218874]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x211/0x290
[ 2243.218876]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218879]  dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x3e/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218881]  signal_irq_work+0x571/0x690 [i915]
[ 2243.218883]  irq_work_run_list+0xd7/0x120
[ 2243.218885]  irq_work_run+0x1d/0x50
[ 2243.218887]  smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x21/0x30
[ 2243.218889]  irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20

CPU 1:
[ 2242.173107]  _raw_spin_lock+0x8f/0xa0
[ 2242.173110]  __i915_request_submit+0x64/0x4a0 [i915]
[ 2242.173112]  __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x8ee/0x2120 [i915]
[ 2242.173114]  ? i915_sched_lookup_priolist+0x1e3/0x2b0 [i915]
[ 2242.173117]  execlists_submit_request+0x2e8/0x2f0 [i915]
[ 2242.173119]  submit_notify+0x8f/0xc0 [i915]
[ 2242.173121]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915]
[ 2242.173124]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
[ 2242.173137]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915]
[ 2242.173140]  i915_sw_fence_commit+0x16/0x20 [i915]

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1318
Fixes: b7404c7ecb38 ("drm/i915: Bump ready tasks ahead of busywaits")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310101720.9944-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 209df10bb4536c81c2540df96c02cd079435357f)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
drm/i915/gt: Close race between cacheline_retire and free 2020-03-11T21:12:39+00:00 Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk 2020-03-06T15:46:47+00:00 8ea6bb8e4d47e07518e5dba4f5cb77e210f0df82 If the cacheline may still be busy, atomically mark it for future release, and only if we can determine that it will never be used again, immediately free it. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1392 Fixes: ebece7539242 ("drm/i915: Keep timeline HWSP allocated until idle across the system") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+ Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306154647.3528345-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 2d4bd971f5baa51418625f379a69f5d58b5a0450) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> 
If the cacheline may still be busy, atomically mark it for future
release, and only if we can determine that it will never be used again,
immediately free it.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1392
Fixes: ebece7539242 ("drm/i915: Keep timeline HWSP allocated until idle across the system")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306154647.3528345-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 2d4bd971f5baa51418625f379a69f5d58b5a0450)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
drm/i915/execlists: Enable timeslice on partial virtual engine dequeue 2020-03-11T21:12:39+00:00 Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk 2020-03-06T11:30:10+00:00 eafc2aa20fba319b6e791a1b0c45a91511eccb6b If we stop filling the ELSP due to an incompatible virtual engine request, check if we should enable the timeslice on behalf of the queue. This fixes the case where we are inspecting the last->next element when we know that the last element is the last request in the execution queue, and so decided we did not need to enable timeslicing despite the intent to do so! Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306113012.3184606-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 3df2deed411e0f1b7312baf0139aab8bba4c0410) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> 
If we stop filling the ELSP due to an incompatible virtual engine
request, check if we should enable the timeslice on behalf of the queue.

This fixes the case where we are inspecting the last->next element when
we know that the last element is the last request in the execution queue,
and so decided we did not need to enable timeslicing despite the intent
to do so!

Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306113012.3184606-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 3df2deed411e0f1b7312baf0139aab8bba4c0410)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>