On newer AMD platforms with SFH, it is observed that random interrupts get generated on the SFH hardware and until this is cleared the firmware sensor processing is stalled, resulting in no data been received to driver side. Add routines to handle these interrupts, so that firmware operations are not stalled. Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Newer AMD platforms with SFH may generate interrupts on some events which are unwarranted. Until this is cleared the actual MP2 data processing maybe stalled in some cases. Add a mechanism to clear the pending interrupts (if any) during the driver initialization and sensor command operations. Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Sensor data is processed in polling mode. Hence disable the interrupt for all sensor command. Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Misinterpreted intr_enable field name. Hence correct the structure
field name accordingly to reflect the functionality.
Fixes: f264481ad614 ("HID: amd_sfh: Extend driver capabilities for multi-generation support")
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Since in the current amd_sfh design the sensor data is periodically obtained in the form of poll data, during the suspend/resume cycle, scheduling a delayed work adds no value. So, cancel the work and restart back during the suspend/resume cycle respectively. Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This patch adds support for the UGTABLET WP5540 digitizer tablet devices. Without it, the pen moves the cursor, but neither the buttons nor the tap sensor in the tip do work. Signed-off-by: Sergio Costas <rastersoft@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63dece1d-91ca-1b1b-d90d-335be66896be@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
ALS illuminance value present only in first 15 bits from SFH firmware
for V2 platforms. Hence added a mask of 15 bit to limit ALS max
illuminance values to get correct illuminance value.
Fixes: 0aad9c95eb9a ("HID: amd_sfh: Extend ALS support for newer AMD platform")
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
HPD sensors take more time to initialize. Hence increasing sensor
command timeout to get response with status within a max timeout.
Fixes: 173709f50e98 ("HID: amd_sfh: Add command response to check command status")
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
I'm was on the receiving end of a lockdep splat from this driver and after
scratching my head I couldn't be entirely sure it was a false positive
given we would also have to think about whether the regulator locking is
safe (since the notifier is called whilst holding regulator locks which
are also needed for regulator_is_enabled() ).
Regardless of whether it is a real bug or not, the mutex isn't needed.
We can use reference counting tricks instead to avoid races with the
notifier calls.
The observed splat follows:
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:3/127 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff00008021fb20 (&ihid_goodix->regulator_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ihid_goodix_vdd_notify+0x30/0x94
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000835c60c0 (&(&rdev->notifier)->rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x30/0x70
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&(&rdev->notifier)->rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
down_write+0x68/0x8c
blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x54/0x70
regulator_register_notifier+0x1c/0x24
devm_regulator_register_notifier+0x58/0x98
i2c_hid_of_goodix_probe+0xdc/0x158
i2c_device_probe+0x25d/0x270
really_probe+0x174/0x2cc
__driver_probe_device+0xc0/0xd8
driver_probe_device+0x50/0xe4
__device_attach_driver+0xa8/0xc0
bus_for_each_drv+0x9c/0xc0
__device_attach_async_helper+0x6c/0xbc
async_run_entry_fn+0x38/0x100
process_one_work+0x294/0x438
worker_thread+0x180/0x258
kthread+0x120/0x130
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #0 (&ihid_goodix->regulator_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__lock_acquire+0xd24/0xfe8
lock_acquire+0x288/0x2f4
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0x338
mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x5c
ihid_goodix_vdd_notify+0x30/0x94
notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0x8c
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x70
_notifier_call_chain.isra.0+0x18/0x20
_regulator_enable+0xc0/0x178
regulator_enable+0x40/0x7c
goodix_i2c_hid_power_up+0x18/0x20
i2c_hid_core_power_up.isra.0+0x1c/0x2c
i2c_hid_core_probe+0xd8/0x3d4
i2c_hid_of_goodix_probe+0x14c/0x158
i2c_device_probe+0x25c/0x270
really_probe+0x174/0x2cc
__driver_probe_device+0xc0/0xd8
driver_probe_device+0x50/0xe4
__device_attach_driver+0xa8/0xc0
bus_for_each_drv+0x9c/0xc0
__device_attach_async_helper+0x6c/0xbc
async_run_entry_fn+0x38/0x100
process_one_work+0x294/0x438
worker_thread+0x180/0x258
kthread+0x120/0x130
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&(&rdev->notifier)->rwsem);
lock(&ihid_goodix->regulator_mutex);
lock(&(&rdev->notifier)->rwsem);
lock(&ihid_goodix->regulator_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Fixes: 18eeef46d359 ("HID: i2c-hid: goodix: Tie the reset line to true state of the regulator")
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
When hid_parse() in elo_probe() fails, it forgets to call usb_put_dev to
decrease the refcount.
Fix this by adding usb_put_dev() in the error handling code of elo_probe().
Fixes: fbf42729d0e9 ("HID: elo: update the reference count of the usb device structure")
Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>