wakelock names are now contain evdev->name and pid

Signed-off-by: Mike Chan <mike@android.com>

Since wall time can jump backwards, it cannot be used to determine if one
event occured before another or for how long a key was pressed.

Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>

Allows userspace code to process input events while
the device appears to be asleep.

Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit 3d5cb60e ("Input: simplify name handling for certain input
handles") introduced a regression for the EVIOCGNAME/JSIOCGNAME
ioctl.

Before this, patch, the platform device's name was given back to
userspace which was good to identify devices. After this patch, the
device is ("event%d", minor) which is not descriptive at all.

This fixes the behaviour by taking dev->name.

Reported-by: Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Reviewed-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>

Synaptics uses anisotropic coordinate system.  On some wide touchpads
vertical resolution can be twice as high as horizontal which causes
unequal sensitivity on x/y directions.  Add support for reading the
resolution with EVIOCGABS ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Tero Saarni <tero.saarni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>

For evdev, joydev and mousedev, instead of having a separate character array
holding name of the handle, use struct devce's name which is the same.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>

Most fasync implementations do something like:

     return fasync_helper(...);

But fasync_helper() will return a positive value at times - a feature used
in at least one place.  Thus, a number of other drivers do:

     err = fasync_helper(...);
     if (err < 0)
             return err;
     return 0;

In the interests of consistency and more concise code, it makes sense to
map positive return values onto zero where ->fasync() is called.

Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.

So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set.  And lose that
crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
don't have to bother anymore.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>