linux-toradex.git/drivers/md/bcache/super.c, branch v4.9.89 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules bcache: don't attach backing with duplicate UUID 2018-03-18T10:18:50+00:00 Michael Lyle mlyle@lyle.org 2018-03-05T21:41:55+00:00 d4f80945828c025e43273cc094f09fb6fe353dbf commit 86755b7a96faed57f910f9e6b8061e019ac1ec08 upstream. This can happen e.g. during disk cloning. This is an incomplete fix: it does not catch duplicate UUIDs earlier when things are still unattached. It does not unregister the device. Further changes to cope better with this are planned but conflict with Coly's ongoing improvements to handling device errors. In the meantime, one can manually stop the device after this has happened. Attempts to attach a duplicate device result in: [ 136.372404] loop: module loaded [ 136.424461] bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device loop0 [ 136.424464] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Tried to attach loop0 but duplicate UUID already attached My test procedure is: dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=imgfile bs=1024 count=262144 losetup -f imgfile Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org> Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 86755b7a96faed57f910f9e6b8061e019ac1ec08 upstream.

This can happen e.g. during disk cloning.

This is an incomplete fix: it does not catch duplicate UUIDs earlier
when things are still unattached.  It does not unregister the device.
Further changes to cope better with this are planned but conflict with
Coly's ongoing improvements to handling device errors.  In the meantime,
one can manually stop the device after this has happened.

Attempts to attach a duplicate device result in:

[  136.372404] loop: module loaded
[  136.424461] bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device loop0
[  136.424464] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Tried to attach loop0 but duplicate UUID already attached

My test procedure is:

  dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=imgfile bs=1024 count=262144
  losetup -f imgfile

Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: fix crashes in duplicate cache device register 2018-03-18T10:18:50+00:00 Tang Junhui tang.junhui@zte.com.cn 2018-03-05T21:41:54+00:00 35d9c9eac24fefeb01a8d74959785bd249f3aeb7 commit cc40daf91bdddbba72a4a8cd0860640e06668309 upstream. Kernel crashed when register a duplicate cache device, the call trace is bellow: [ 417.643790] CPU: 1 PID: 16886 Comm: bcache-register Tainted: G W OE 4.15.5-amd64-preempt-sysrq-20171018 #2 [ 417.643861] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ERCTO1WW/20ERCTO1WW, BIOS N1DET41W (1.15 ) 12/31/2015 [ 417.643870] RIP: 0010:bdevname+0x13/0x1e [ 417.643876] RSP: 0018:ffffa3aa9138fd38 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 417.643884] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8c8f2f2f8000 RCX: ffffd6701f8 c7edf [ 417.643890] RDX: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RSI: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RDI: 00000000000 00000 [ 417.643895] RBP: ffffa3aa9138fde0 R08: ffffa3aa9138fae8 R09: 00000000000 1850e [ 417.643901] R10: ffff8c8eed34b271 R11: ffff8c8eed34b250 R12: 00000000000 00000 [ 417.643906] R13: ffffd6701f78f940 R14: ffff8c8f38f80000 R15: ffff8c8ea7d 90000 [ 417.643913] FS: 00007fde7e66f500(0000) GS:ffff8c8f61440000(0000) knlGS: 0000000000000000 [ 417.643919] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 417.643925] CR2: 0000000000000314 CR3: 00000007e6fa0001 CR4: 00000000003 606e0 [ 417.643931] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 00000000000 00000 [ 417.643938] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000000000 00400 [ 417.643946] Call Trace: [ 417.643978] register_bcache+0x1117/0x1270 [bcache] [ 417.643994] ? slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x15/0x3c [ 417.644001] ? slab_post_alloc_hook.isra.44+0xa/0x1a [ 417.644013] ? kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138 [ 417.644020] kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138 [ 417.644031] __vfs_write+0x31/0xcc [ 417.644043] ? current_kernel_time64+0x10/0x36 [ 417.644115] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xbf/0xe3 [ 417.644124] vfs_write+0xa5/0xe2 [ 417.644133] SyS_write+0x5c/0x9f [ 417.644144] do_syscall_64+0x72/0x81 [ 417.644161] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2 [ 417.644169] RIP: 0033:0x7fde7e1c1974 [ 417.644175] RSP: 002b:00007fff13009a38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000 000000001 [ 417.644183] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000001658280 RCX: 00007fde7e1c 1974 [ 417.644188] RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000001658280 RDI: 000000000000 0001 [ 417.644193] RBP: 000000000000000a R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000 0077 [ 417.644198] R10: 000000000000089e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000 0001 [ 417.644203] R13: 000000000000000a R14: 7fffffffffffffff R15: 000000000000 0000 [ 417.644213] Code: c7 c2 83 6f ee 98 be 20 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 6c 27 3b 0 0 48 89 d8 5b c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 70 48 89 f2 48 8b bf 80 00 00 00 <8 b> b0 14 03 00 00 e9 73 ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 40 39 [ 417.644302] RIP: bdevname+0x13/0x1e RSP: ffffa3aa9138fd38 [ 417.644306] CR2: 0000000000000314 When registering duplicate cache device in register_cache(), after failure on calling register_cache_set(), bch_cache_release() will be called, then bdev will be freed, so bdevname(bdev, name) caused kernel crash. Since bch_cache_release() will free bdev, so in this patch we make sure bdev being freed if register_cache() fail, and do not free bdev again in register_bcache() when register_cache() fail. Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Tested-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit cc40daf91bdddbba72a4a8cd0860640e06668309 upstream.

Kernel crashed when register a duplicate cache device, the call trace is
bellow:
[  417.643790] CPU: 1 PID: 16886 Comm: bcache-register Tainted: G
   W  OE    4.15.5-amd64-preempt-sysrq-20171018 #2
[  417.643861] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ERCTO1WW/20ERCTO1WW, BIOS
N1DET41W (1.15 ) 12/31/2015
[  417.643870] RIP: 0010:bdevname+0x13/0x1e
[  417.643876] RSP: 0018:ffffa3aa9138fd38 EFLAGS: 00010282
[  417.643884] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8c8f2f2f8000 RCX: ffffd6701f8
c7edf
[  417.643890] RDX: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RSI: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RDI: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643895] RBP: ffffa3aa9138fde0 R08: ffffa3aa9138fae8 R09: 00000000000
1850e
[  417.643901] R10: ffff8c8eed34b271 R11: ffff8c8eed34b250 R12: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643906] R13: ffffd6701f78f940 R14: ffff8c8f38f80000 R15: ffff8c8ea7d
90000
[  417.643913] FS:  00007fde7e66f500(0000) GS:ffff8c8f61440000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
[  417.643919] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  417.643925] CR2: 0000000000000314 CR3: 00000007e6fa0001 CR4: 00000000003
606e0
[  417.643931] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643938] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000000000
00400
[  417.643946] Call Trace:
[  417.643978]  register_bcache+0x1117/0x1270 [bcache]
[  417.643994]  ? slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x15/0x3c
[  417.644001]  ? slab_post_alloc_hook.isra.44+0xa/0x1a
[  417.644013]  ? kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138
[  417.644020]  kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138
[  417.644031]  __vfs_write+0x31/0xcc
[  417.644043]  ? current_kernel_time64+0x10/0x36
[  417.644115]  ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xbf/0xe3
[  417.644124]  vfs_write+0xa5/0xe2
[  417.644133]  SyS_write+0x5c/0x9f
[  417.644144]  do_syscall_64+0x72/0x81
[  417.644161]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
[  417.644169] RIP: 0033:0x7fde7e1c1974
[  417.644175] RSP: 002b:00007fff13009a38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000
000000001
[  417.644183] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000001658280 RCX: 00007fde7e1c
1974
[  417.644188] RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000001658280 RDI: 000000000000
0001
[  417.644193] RBP: 000000000000000a R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000
0077
[  417.644198] R10: 000000000000089e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000
0001
[  417.644203] R13: 000000000000000a R14: 7fffffffffffffff R15: 000000000000
0000
[  417.644213] Code: c7 c2 83 6f ee 98 be 20 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 6c 27 3b 0
0 48 89 d8 5b c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 70 48 89 f2 48 8b bf 80 00 00 00 <8
b> b0 14 03 00 00 e9 73 ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 40 39
[  417.644302] RIP: bdevname+0x13/0x1e RSP: ffffa3aa9138fd38
[  417.644306] CR2: 0000000000000314

When registering duplicate cache device in register_cache(), after failure
on calling register_cache_set(), bch_cache_release() will be called, then
bdev will be freed, so bdevname(bdev, name) caused kernel crash.

Since bch_cache_release() will free bdev, so in this patch we make sure
bdev being freed if register_cache() fail, and do not free bdev again in
register_bcache() when register_cache() fail.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: explicitly destroy mutex while exiting 2017-12-20T09:07:30+00:00 Liang Chen liangchen.linux@gmail.com 2017-10-30T21:46:35+00:00 c2a0531f59c363fd5b50be46b97248091b13484b [ Upstream commit 330a4db89d39a6b43f36da16824eaa7a7509d34d ] mutex_destroy does nothing most of time, but it's better to call it to make the code future proof and it also has some meaning for like mutex debug. As Coly pointed out in a previous review, bcache_exit() may not be able to handle all the references properly if userspace registers cache and backing devices right before bch_debug_init runs and bch_debug_init failes later. So not exposing userspace interface until everything is ready to avoid that issue. Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org> Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit 330a4db89d39a6b43f36da16824eaa7a7509d34d ]

mutex_destroy does nothing most of time, but it's better to call
it to make the code future proof and it also has some meaning
for like mutex debug.

As Coly pointed out in a previous review, bcache_exit() may not be
able to handle all the references properly if userspace registers
cache and backing devices right before bch_debug_init runs and
bch_debug_init failes later. So not exposing userspace interface
until everything is ready to avoid that issue.

Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: fix for gc and write-back race 2017-09-27T12:39:25+00:00 Tang Junhui tang.junhui@zte.com.cn 2017-09-06T06:25:59+00:00 57aa1a6967b28431d62beec299125a969a469f3f commit 9baf30972b5568d8b5bc8b3c46a6ec5b58100463 upstream. gc and write-back get raced (see the email "bcache get stucked" I sended before): gc thread write-back thread | |bch_writeback_thread() |bch_gc_thread() | | |==>read_dirty() |==>bch_btree_gc() | |==>btree_root() //get btree root | | //node write locker | |==>bch_btree_gc_root() | | |==>read_dirty_submit() | |==>write_dirty() | |==>continue_at(cl, | | write_dirty_finish, | | system_wq); | |==>write_dirty_finish()//excute | | //in system_wq | |==>bch_btree_insert() | |==>bch_btree_map_leaf_nodes() | |==>__bch_btree_map_nodes() | |==>btree_root //try to get btree | | //root node read | | //lock | |-----stuck here |==>bch_btree_set_root() |==>bch_journal_meta() |==>bch_journal() |==>journal_try_write() |==>journal_write_unlocked() //journal_full(&c->journal) | //condition satisfied |==>continue_at(cl, journal_write, system_wq); //try to excute | //journal_write in system_wq | //but work queue is excuting | //write_dirty_finish() |==>closure_sync(); //wait journal_write execute | //over and wake up gc, |-------------stuck here |==>release root node write locker This patch alloc a separate work-queue for write-back thread to avoid such race. (Commit log re-organized by Coly Li to pass checkpatch.pl checking) Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9baf30972b5568d8b5bc8b3c46a6ec5b58100463 upstream.

gc and write-back get raced (see the email "bcache get stucked" I sended
before):
gc thread                               write-back thread
|                                       |bch_writeback_thread()
|bch_gc_thread()                        |
|                                       |==>read_dirty()
|==>bch_btree_gc()                      |
|==>btree_root() //get btree root       |
|                //node write locker    |
|==>bch_btree_gc_root()                 |
|                                       |==>read_dirty_submit()
|                                       |==>write_dirty()
|                                       |==>continue_at(cl,
|                                       |               write_dirty_finish,
|                                       |               system_wq);
|                                       |==>write_dirty_finish()//excute
|                                       |               //in system_wq
|                                       |==>bch_btree_insert()
|                                       |==>bch_btree_map_leaf_nodes()
|                                       |==>__bch_btree_map_nodes()
|                                       |==>btree_root //try to get btree
|                                       |              //root node read
|                                       |              //lock
|                                       |-----stuck here
|==>bch_btree_set_root()
|==>bch_journal_meta()
|==>bch_journal()
|==>journal_try_write()
|==>journal_write_unlocked() //journal_full(&c->journal)
|                            //condition satisfied
|==>continue_at(cl, journal_write, system_wq); //try to excute
|                               //journal_write in system_wq
|                               //but work queue is excuting
|                               //write_dirty_finish()
|==>closure_sync(); //wait journal_write execute
|                   //over and wake up gc,
|-------------stuck here
|==>release root node write locker

This patch alloc a separate work-queue for write-back thread to avoid such
race.

(Commit log re-organized by Coly Li to pass checkpatch.pl checking)

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: Fix leak of bdev reference 2017-09-27T12:39:24+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2017-09-06T06:25:51+00:00 c234e0e77572d78cbac0de7acee2263343595c25 commit 4b758df21ee7081ab41448d21d60367efaa625b3 upstream. If blkdev_get_by_path() in register_bcache() fails, we try to lookup the block device using lookup_bdev() to detect which situation we are in to properly report error. However we never drop the reference returned to us from lookup_bdev(). Fix that. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4b758df21ee7081ab41448d21d60367efaa625b3 upstream.

If blkdev_get_by_path() in register_bcache() fails, we try to lookup the
block device using lookup_bdev() to detect which situation we are in to
properly report error. However we never drop the reference returned to
us from lookup_bdev(). Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: initialize dirty stripes in flash_dev_run() 2017-09-27T12:39:24+00:00 Tang Junhui tang.junhui@zte.com.cn 2017-09-06T17:28:53+00:00 2a9b55742a9fe838ddc86f8b5c75a56867ea1912 commit 175206cf9ab63161dec74d9cd7f9992e062491f5 upstream. bcache uses a Proportion-Differentiation Controller algorithm to control writeback rate to cached devices. In the PD controller algorithm, dirty stripes of thin flash device should not be counted in, because flash only volumes never write back dirty data. Currently dirty stripe counter for thin flash device is not initialized when the thin flash device starts. Which means the following calculation in PD controller will reference an undefined dirty stripes number, and all cached devices attached to the same cache set where the thin flash device lies on may have an inaccurate writeback rate. This patch calles bch_sectors_dirty_init() in flash_dev_run(), to correctly initialize dirty stripe counter when the thin flash device starts to run. This patch also does following parameter data type change, -void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct cached_dev *dc); +void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcache_device *); to call this function conveniently in flash_dev_run(). (Commit log is composed by Coly Li) Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 175206cf9ab63161dec74d9cd7f9992e062491f5 upstream.

bcache uses a Proportion-Differentiation Controller algorithm to control
writeback rate to cached devices. In the PD controller algorithm, dirty
stripes of thin flash device should not be counted in, because flash only
volumes never write back dirty data.

Currently dirty stripe counter for thin flash device is not initialized
when the thin flash device starts. Which means the following calculation
in PD controller will reference an undefined dirty stripes number, and
all cached devices attached to the same cache set where the thin flash
device lies on may have an inaccurate writeback rate.

This patch calles bch_sectors_dirty_init() in flash_dev_run(), to
correctly initialize dirty stripe counter when the thin flash device
starts to run. This patch also does following parameter data type change,
 -void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct cached_dev *dc);
 +void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcache_device *);
to call this function conveniently in flash_dev_run().

(Commit log is composed by Coly Li)

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state() 2017-02-23T16:44:36+00:00 Kent Overstreet kent.overstreet@gmail.com 2016-10-27T03:31:17+00:00 8629aed2387cd22d1bde76e798034c3ea31018f7 commit be628be09563f8f6e81929efbd7cf3f45c344416 upstream. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit be628be09563f8f6e81929efbd7cf3f45c344416 upstream.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bcache: pr_err: more meaningful error message when nr_stripes is invalid 2016-08-19T03:31:03+00:00 Eric Wheeler git@linux.ewheeler.net 2016-08-19T03:15:26+00:00 90706094d5be614ae7285b3c96c3125bb198618c The original error was thought to be corruption, but was actually caused by: make-bcache --data-offset N where N was in bytes and should have been in sectors. While userspace tools should be updated to check --data-offset beyond end of volume, hopefully this will help others that might not have noticed the units. Signed-off-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> 
The original error was thought to be corruption, but was actually caused by:
	make-bcache --data-offset N
where N was in bytes and should have been in sectors.  While userspace
tools should be updated to check --data-offset beyond end of volume,
hopefully this will help others that might not have noticed the units.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
bcache: RESERVE_PRIO is too small by one when prio_buckets() is a power of two. 2016-08-19T03:29:49+00:00 Kent Overstreet kent.overstreet@gmail.com 2016-08-18T01:21:24+00:00 acc9cf8c66c66b2cbbdb4a375537edee72be64df This patch fixes a cachedev registration-time allocation deadlock. This can deadlock on boot if your initrd auto-registeres bcache devices: Allocator thread: [ 720.727614] INFO: task bcache_allocato:3833 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 720.732361] [<ffffffff816eeac7>] schedule+0x37/0x90 [ 720.732963] [<ffffffffa05192b8>] bch_bucket_alloc+0x188/0x360 [bcache] [ 720.733538] [<ffffffff810e6950>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [ 720.734137] [<ffffffffa05302bd>] bch_prio_write+0x19d/0x340 [bcache] [ 720.734715] [<ffffffffa05190bf>] bch_allocator_thread+0x3ff/0x470 [bcache] [ 720.735311] [<ffffffff816ee41c>] ? __schedule+0x2dc/0x950 [ 720.735884] [<ffffffffa0518cc0>] ? invalidate_buckets+0x980/0x980 [bcache] Registration thread: [ 720.710403] INFO: task bash:3531 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 720.715226] [<ffffffff816eeac7>] schedule+0x37/0x90 [ 720.715805] [<ffffffffa05235cd>] __bch_btree_map_nodes+0x12d/0x150 [bcache] [ 720.716409] [<ffffffffa0522d30>] ? bch_btree_insert_check_key+0x1c0/0x1c0 [bcache] [ 720.717008] [<ffffffffa05236e4>] bch_btree_insert+0xf4/0x170 [bcache] [ 720.717586] [<ffffffff810e6950>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [ 720.718191] [<ffffffffa0527d9a>] bch_journal_replay+0x14a/0x290 [bcache] [ 720.718766] [<ffffffff810cc90d>] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.94+0x5d/0x70 [ 720.719369] [<ffffffff810cf684>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1d4/0x350 [ 720.719968] [<ffffffffa05317d0>] run_cache_set+0x580/0x8e0 [bcache] [ 720.720553] [<ffffffffa053302e>] register_bcache+0xe2e/0x13b0 [bcache] [ 720.721153] [<ffffffff81354cef>] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20 [ 720.721730] [<ffffffff812a2dad>] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x50 [ 720.722327] [<ffffffff812a225a>] kernfs_fop_write+0x12a/0x180 [ 720.722904] [<ffffffff81225177>] __vfs_write+0x37/0x110 [ 720.723503] [<ffffffff81228048>] ? __sb_start_write+0x58/0x110 [ 720.724100] [<ffffffff812cedb3>] ? security_file_permission+0x23/0xa0 [ 720.724675] [<ffffffff812258a9>] vfs_write+0xa9/0x1b0 [ 720.725275] [<ffffffff8102479c>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x6c/0x70 [ 720.725849] [<ffffffff81226755>] SyS_write+0x55/0xd0 [ 720.726451] [<ffffffff8106a390>] ? do_page_fault+0x30/0x80 [ 720.727045] [<ffffffff816f2cae>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71 The fifo code in upstream bcache can't use the last element in the buffer, which was the cause of the bug: if you asked for a power of two size, it'd give you a fifo that could hold one less than what you asked for rather than allocating a buffer twice as big. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Tested-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
This patch fixes a cachedev registration-time allocation deadlock.
This can deadlock on boot if your initrd auto-registeres bcache devices:

Allocator thread:
[  720.727614] INFO: task bcache_allocato:3833 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  720.732361]  [<ffffffff816eeac7>] schedule+0x37/0x90
[  720.732963]  [<ffffffffa05192b8>] bch_bucket_alloc+0x188/0x360 [bcache]
[  720.733538]  [<ffffffff810e6950>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[  720.734137]  [<ffffffffa05302bd>] bch_prio_write+0x19d/0x340 [bcache]
[  720.734715]  [<ffffffffa05190bf>] bch_allocator_thread+0x3ff/0x470 [bcache]
[  720.735311]  [<ffffffff816ee41c>] ? __schedule+0x2dc/0x950
[  720.735884]  [<ffffffffa0518cc0>] ? invalidate_buckets+0x980/0x980 [bcache]

Registration thread:
[  720.710403] INFO: task bash:3531 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  720.715226]  [<ffffffff816eeac7>] schedule+0x37/0x90
[  720.715805]  [<ffffffffa05235cd>] __bch_btree_map_nodes+0x12d/0x150 [bcache]
[  720.716409]  [<ffffffffa0522d30>] ? bch_btree_insert_check_key+0x1c0/0x1c0 [bcache]
[  720.717008]  [<ffffffffa05236e4>] bch_btree_insert+0xf4/0x170 [bcache]
[  720.717586]  [<ffffffff810e6950>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[  720.718191]  [<ffffffffa0527d9a>] bch_journal_replay+0x14a/0x290 [bcache]
[  720.718766]  [<ffffffff810cc90d>] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.94+0x5d/0x70
[  720.719369]  [<ffffffff810cf684>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1d4/0x350
[  720.719968]  [<ffffffffa05317d0>] run_cache_set+0x580/0x8e0 [bcache]
[  720.720553]  [<ffffffffa053302e>] register_bcache+0xe2e/0x13b0 [bcache]
[  720.721153]  [<ffffffff81354cef>] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
[  720.721730]  [<ffffffff812a2dad>] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x50
[  720.722327]  [<ffffffff812a225a>] kernfs_fop_write+0x12a/0x180
[  720.722904]  [<ffffffff81225177>] __vfs_write+0x37/0x110
[  720.723503]  [<ffffffff81228048>] ? __sb_start_write+0x58/0x110
[  720.724100]  [<ffffffff812cedb3>] ? security_file_permission+0x23/0xa0
[  720.724675]  [<ffffffff812258a9>] vfs_write+0xa9/0x1b0
[  720.725275]  [<ffffffff8102479c>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x6c/0x70
[  720.725849]  [<ffffffff81226755>] SyS_write+0x55/0xd0
[  720.726451]  [<ffffffff8106a390>] ? do_page_fault+0x30/0x80
[  720.727045]  [<ffffffff816f2cae>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71

The fifo code in upstream bcache can't use the last element in the buffer,
which was the cause of the bug: if you asked for a power of two size,
it'd give you a fifo that could hold one less than what you asked for
rather than allocating a buffer twice as big.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
bcache: register_bcache(): call blkdev_put() when cache_alloc() fails 2016-08-19T03:28:23+00:00 Eric Wheeler git@linux.ewheeler.net 2016-06-17T22:01:54+00:00 d9dc1702b297ec4a6bb9c0326a70641b322ba886 register_cache() is supposed to return an error string on error so that register_bcache() will will blkdev_put and cleanup other user counters, but it does not set 'char *err' when cache_alloc() fails (eg, due to memory pressure) and thus register_bcache() performs no cleanup. register_bcache() <----------\ <- no jump to err_close, no blkdev_put() | | +->register_cache() | <- fails to set char *err | | +->cache_alloc() ---/ <- returns error This patch sets `char *err` for this failure case so that register_cache() will cause register_bcache() to correctly jump to err_close and do cleanup. This was tested under OOM conditions that triggered the bug. Signed-off-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
register_cache() is supposed to return an error string on error so that
register_bcache() will will blkdev_put and cleanup other user counters,
but it does not set 'char *err' when cache_alloc() fails (eg, due to
memory pressure) and thus register_bcache() performs no cleanup.

register_bcache() <----------\  <- no jump to err_close, no blkdev_put()
   |                         |
   +->register_cache()       |  <- fails to set char *err
         |                   |
         +->cache_alloc() ---/  <- returns error

This patch sets `char *err` for this failure case so that register_cache()
will cause register_bcache() to correctly jump to err_close and do
cleanup.  This was tested under OOM conditions that triggered the bug.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org