linux-toradex.git/drivers/md/bcache, branch v4.14-rc7

bcache: use llist_for_each_entry_safe() in __closure_wake_up()

2017-09-27T20:54:49+00:00

Commit 09b3efec ("bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist
API") replaces the following while loop by llist_for_each_entry(),

-
-	while (reverse) {
-		cl = container_of(reverse, struct closure, list);
-		reverse = llist_next(reverse);
-
+	llist_for_each_entry(cl, reverse, list) {
 		closure_set_waiting(cl, 0);
 		closure_sub(cl, CLOSURE_WAITING + 1);
 	}

This modification introduces a potential race by iterating a corrupted
list. Here is how it happens.

In the above modification, closure_sub() may wake up a process which is
waiting on reverse list. If this process decides to wait again by calling
closure_wait(), its cl->list will be added to another wait list. Then
when llist_for_each_entry() continues to iterate next node, it will travel
on another new wait list which is added in closure_wait(), not the
original reverse list in __closure_wake_up(). It is more probably to
happen on UP machine because the waked up process may preempt the process
which wakes up it.

Use llist_for_each_entry_safe() will fix the issue, the safe version fetch
next node before waking up a process. Then the copy of next node will make
sure list iteration stays on original reverse list.

Fixes: 09b3efec81de ("bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Reported-by: Michael Lyle 
Reviewed-by: Byungchul Park 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: initialize dirty stripes in flash_dev_run()

2017-09-07T19:32:29+00:00

bcache uses a Proportion-Differentiation Controller algorithm to control
writeback rate to cached devices. In the PD controller algorithm, dirty
stripes of thin flash device should not be counted in, because flash only
volumes never write back dirty data.

Currently dirty stripe counter for thin flash device is not initialized
when the thin flash device starts. Which means the following calculation
in PD controller will reference an undefined dirty stripes number, and
all cached devices attached to the same cache set where the thin flash
device lies on may have an inaccurate writeback rate.

This patch calles bch_sectors_dirty_init() in flash_dev_run(), to
correctly initialize dirty stripe counter when the thin flash device
starts to run. This patch also does following parameter data type change,
 -void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct cached_dev *dc);
 +void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcache_device *);
to call this function conveniently in flash_dev_run().

(Commit log is composed by Coly Li)

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Coly Li 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: fix bch_hprint crash and improve output

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

Most importantly, solve a crash where %llu was used to format signed
numbers.  This would cause a buffer overflow when reading sysfs
writeback_rate_debug, as only 20 bytes were allocated for this and
%llu writes 20 characters plus a null.

Always use the units mechanism rather than having different output
paths for simplicity.

Also, correct problems with display output where 1.10 was a larger
number than 1.09, by multiplying by 10 and then dividing by 1024 instead
of dividing by 100.  (Remainders of >= 1000 would print as .10).

Minor changes: Always display the decimal point instead of trying to
omit it based on number of digits shown.  Decide what units to use
based on 1000 as a threshold, not 1024 (in other words, always print
at most 3 digits before the decimal point).

Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle 
Reported-by: Dmitry Yu Okunev 
Acked-by: Kent Overstreet 
Reviewed-by: Coly Li 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: Update continue_at() documentation

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

continue_at() doesn't have a return statement anymore.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Acked-by: Coly Li 
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: silence static checker warning

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

In olden times, closure_return() used to have a hidden return built in.
We removed the hidden return but forgot to add a new return here.  If
"c" were NULL we would oops on the next line, but fortunately "c" is
never NULL.  Let's just remove the if statement.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Reviewed-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: fix for gc and write-back race

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

gc and write-back get raced (see the email "bcache get stucked" I sended
before):
gc thread                               write-back thread
|                                       |bch_writeback_thread()
|bch_gc_thread()                        |
|                                       |==>read_dirty()
|==>bch_btree_gc()                      |
|==>btree_root() //get btree root       |
|                //node write locker    |
|==>bch_btree_gc_root()                 |
|                                       |==>read_dirty_submit()
|                                       |==>write_dirty()
|                                       |==>continue_at(cl,
|                                       |               write_dirty_finish,
|                                       |               system_wq);
|                                       |==>write_dirty_finish()//excute
|                                       |               //in system_wq
|                                       |==>bch_btree_insert()
|                                       |==>bch_btree_map_leaf_nodes()
|                                       |==>__bch_btree_map_nodes()
|                                       |==>btree_root //try to get btree
|                                       |              //root node read
|                                       |              //lock
|                                       |-----stuck here
|==>bch_btree_set_root()
|==>bch_journal_meta()
|==>bch_journal()
|==>journal_try_write()
|==>journal_write_unlocked() //journal_full(&c->journal)
|                            //condition satisfied
|==>continue_at(cl, journal_write, system_wq); //try to excute
|                               //journal_write in system_wq
|                               //but work queue is excuting
|                               //write_dirty_finish()
|==>closure_sync(); //wait journal_write execute
|                   //over and wake up gc,
|-------------stuck here
|==>release root node write locker

This patch alloc a separate work-queue for write-back thread to avoid such
race.

(Commit log re-organized by Coly Li to pass checkpatch.pl checking)

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Acked-by: Coly Li 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: increase the number of open buckets

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

In currently, we only alloc 6 open buckets for each cache set,
but in usually, we always attach about 10 or so backend devices for
each cache set, and the each bcache device are always accessed by
about 10 or so threads in top application layer. So 6 open buckets
are too few, It has led to that each of the same thread write data
to different buckets, which would cause low efficiency write-back,
and also cause buckets inefficient, and would be Very easy to run
out of.

I add debug message in bch_open_buckets_alloc() to print alloc bucket
info, and test with ten bcache devices with a cache set, and each
bcache device is accessed by ten threads.

From the debug message, we can see that, after the modification, One
bucket is more likely to assign to the same thread, and the data from
the same thread are more likely to write the same bucket. Usually the
same thread always write/read the same backend device, so it is good
for write-back and also promote the usage efficiency of buckets.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: Correct return value for sysfs attach errors

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

If you encounter any errors in bch_cached_dev_attach it will return
a negative error code.  The variable 'v' which stores the result is
unsigned, thus user space sees a very large value returned for bytes
written which can cause incorrect user space behavior.  Utilize 1
signed variable to use throughout the function to preserve error return
capability.

Signed-off-by: Tony Asleson 
Acked-by: Coly Li 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: correct cache_dirty_target in __update_writeback_rate()

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

__update_write_rate() uses a Proportion-Differentiation Controller
algorithm to control writeback rate. A dirty target number is used in
this PD controller to control writeback rate. A larger target number
will make the writeback rate smaller, on the versus, a smaller target
number will make the writeback rate larger.

bcache uses the following steps to calculate the target number,
1) cache_sectors = all-buckets-of-cache-set * buckets-size
2) cache_dirty_target = cache_sectors * cached-device-writeback_percent
3) target = cache_dirty_target *
(sectors-of-cached-device/sectors-of-all-cached-devices-of-this-cache-set)

The calculation at step 1) for cache_sectors is incorrect, which does
not consider dirty blocks occupied by flash only volume.

A flash only volume can be took as a bcache device without cached
device. All data sectors allocated for it are persistent on cache device
and marked dirty, they are not touched by bcache writeback and garbage
collection code. So data blocks of flash only volume should be ignore
when calculating cache_sectors of cache set.

Current code does not subtract dirty sectors of flash only volume, which
results a larger target number from the above 3 steps. And in sequence
the cache device's writeback rate is smaller then a correct value,
writeback speed is slower on all cached devices.

This patch fixes the incorrect slower writeback rate by subtracting
dirty sectors of flash only volumes in __update_writeback_rate().

(Commit log composed by Coly Li to pass checkpatch.pl checking)

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Coly Li 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: gc does not work when triggering by manual command

2017-09-06T14:17:33+00:00

I try to execute the following command to trigger gc thread:
[root@localhost internal]# echo 1 > trigger_gc
But it does not work, I debug the code in gc_should_run(), It works only
if in invalidating or sectors_to_gc < 0. So set sectors_to_gc to -1 to
meet the condition when we trigger gc by manual command.

(Code comments aded by Coly Li)

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe