There are some lines could be removed due to recent
change for raid1 such as commit 3956df15d634 ("md:
move suspend_hi/lo handling into core md code").

Also, seems some comments are put to wrong place,
move them before wait_barrier.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

If freeze_array is attempted in the middle of close_sync/
wait_all_barriers, deadlock can occur.

freeze_array will wait for nr_pending and nr_queued to line up.
wait_all_barriers increments nr_pending for each barrier bucket, one
at a time, but doesn't actually issue IO that could be counted in
nr_queued. So freeze_array is blocked until wait_all_barriers
completes and allow_all_barriers runs. At the same time, when
_wait_barrier sees array_frozen == 1, it stops and waits for
freeze_array to complete.

Prevent the deadlock by making close_sync call _wait_barrier and
_allow_barrier for one bucket at a time, instead of deferring the
_allow_barrier calls until after all _wait_barriers are complete.

Signed-off-by: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com>
Fix: fd76863e37fe(RAID1: a new I/O barrier implementation to remove resync window)
Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v4.11)
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Hi - I submit this patch for the next merge window:

Some times ago, I made a patch f9c79bc05a2a that blocks signals around the
schedule() calls in MD. The MD subsystem needs to do an uninterruptible
sleep that is not accounted in load average - so we block signals and use
interruptible sleep.

The kernel has a special TASK_IDLE state for this purpose, so we can use
it instead of blocking signals. This patch doesn't fix any bug, it just
makes the code simpler.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

The '2' argument means "wake up anything that is waiting".
This is an inelegant part of the design and was added
to help support management of suspend_lo/suspend_hi setting.
Now that suspend_lo/hi is managed in mddev_suspend/resume,
that need is gone.
These is still a couple of places where we call 'quiesce'
with an argument of '2', but they can safely be changed to
call ->quiesce(.., 1); ->quiesce(.., 0) which
achieve the same result at the small cost of pausing IO
briefly.

This removes a small "optimization" from suspend_{hi,lo}_store,
but it isn't clear that optimization served a useful purpose.
The code now is a lot clearer.

Suggested-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

responding to ->suspend_lo and ->suspend_hi is similar
to responding to ->suspended.  It is best to wait in
the common core code without incrementing ->active_io.
This allows mddev_suspend()/mddev_resume() to work while
requests are waiting for suspend_lo/hi to change.
This is will be important after a subsequent patch
which uses mddev_suspend() to synchronize updating for
suspend_lo/hi.

So move the code for testing suspend_lo/hi out of raid1.c
and raid5.c, and place it in md.c

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Motivated by the desire to illiminate the imprecise nature of
DM-specific patches being unnecessarily sent to both the MD maintainer
and mailing-list.  Which is born out of the fact that DM files also
reside in drivers/md/

Now all MD-specific files in drivers/md/ start with either "raid" or
"md-" and the MAINTAINERS file has been updated accordingly.

Shaohua: don't change module name

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

The check used here is to avoid conflict between write and
resync, however we used the wrong logic, it should be the
inverse of the checking inside "if".

Fixes: 589a1c4 ("Suspend writes in RAID1 if within range")
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Pull MD updates from Shaohua Li:
 "This update mainly fixes bugs:

   - Make raid5 ppl support several ppl from Pawel

   - Several raid5-cache bug fixes from Song

   - Bitmap fixes from Neil and Me

   - One raid1/10 regression fix since 4.12 from Me

   - Other small fixes and cleanup"

* tag 'md/4.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shli/md:
  md/bitmap: disable bitmap_resize for file-backed bitmaps.
  raid5-ppl: Recovery support for multiple partial parity logs
  md: Runtime support for multiple ppls
  md/raid0: attach correct cgroup info in bio
  lib/raid6: align AVX512 constants to 512 bits, not bytes
  raid5: remove raid5_build_block
  md/r5cache: call mddev_lock/unlock() in r5c_journal_mode_show
  md: replace seq_release_private with seq_release
  md: notify about new spare disk in the container
  md/raid1/10: reset bio allocated from mempool
  md/raid5: release/flush io in raid5_do_work()
  md/bitmap: copy correct data for bitmap super

Increase PPL area to 1MB and use it as circular buffer to store PPL. The
entry with highest generation number is the latest one. If PPL to be
written is larger then space left in a buffer, rewind the buffer to the
start (don't wrap it).

Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Data allocated from mempool doesn't always get initialized, this happens when
the data is reused instead of fresh allocation. In the raid1/10 case, we must
reinitialize the bios.

Reported-by: Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood@gmail.com>
Fixes: f0250618361d(md: raid10: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages)
Fixes: 98d30c5812c3(md: raid1: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (4.12+)
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>