Replace all DMA_32BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(32)

Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang<yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Convert to internal net_device-stats and net_device_ops

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The generic packet receive code takes care of setting
netdev->last_rx when necessary, for the sake of the
bonding ARP monitor.

Drivers need not do it any more.

Some cases had to be skipped over because the drivers
were making use of the ->last_rx value themselves.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Conflicts:

	drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c

This converts pretty much everything to print_mac. There were
a few things that had conflicts which I have just dropped for
now, no harm done.

I've built an allyesconfig with this and looked at the files
that weren't built very carefully, but it's a huge patch.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We need to check the address that pci_alloc_consistent() returns since
it might fail.

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

Clean up the various different email addresses of mine listed in the code
to a single current and valid address. As Dave says his network merges
for 2.6.28 are now done this seems a good point to send them in where
they won't risk disrupting real changes.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Changeset 16b110c3fd760620b4a787db6ed512fe531ab1b5 (dmfe warning fix)
bothed up the offsets read from the SROM so that it doesn't read the
same datums it used to.

The change made transformations like turning:

	"srom + 34"

into

	"(__le32 *)srom + 34/4"

which doesn't work because 4 does not divide evenly
into 34 so we're using a different pointer offset
than in the original code.

I've changed theses cases in dmfe_parse_srom() to
consistently use "(type *)(srom + offset)" preserving
the offsets from the original code.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>