<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-toradex.git/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c, branch v2.6.32.45</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove number field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:06:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:31:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=07a09694de556f307b1c5035cdf0f17c6243d1cd'/>
<id>07a09694de556f307b1c5035cdf0f17c6243d1cd</id>
<content type='text'>
Since slot_cap field in struct controller contains physical slot
number informationq, we don't need number field in struct slot.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Since slot_cap field in struct controller contains physical slot
number informationq, we don't need number field in struct slot.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove hpc_ops</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:06:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:30:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=82a9e79ef132cbf77de58aae35c1a14237f2fcde'/>
<id>82a9e79ef132cbf77de58aae35c1a14237f2fcde</id>
<content type='text'>
The struct hpc_ops seems a set of hooks to controller specific
routines. But, it is meaningless because no hotplug controller driver
follows this framework.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The struct hpc_ops seems a set of hooks to controller specific
routines. But, it is meaningless because no hotplug controller driver
follows this framework.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove pci_dev field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:06:25+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:30:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=385e24917ed8eeba25dddd8e63bf3fe3d53eafc5'/>
<id>385e24917ed8eeba25dddd8e63bf3fe3d53eafc5</id>
<content type='text'>
Since we have a pointer to pcie_device in struct controller, we don't
need a pointer to pci_dev.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Since we have a pointer to pcie_device in struct controller, we don't
need a pointer to pci_dev.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove slot_device_offset field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:06:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:28:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=a2359a334fb2c89347e031c4494282e6756e9ae7'/>
<id>a2359a334fb2c89347e031c4494282e6756e9ae7</id>
<content type='text'>
Since the device number of the hot-slot under the PCIe downstream port
is always 0, the slot_device_offset field in the slot is meaningless
and we don't need it.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Since the device number of the hot-slot under the PCIe downstream port
is always 0, the slot_device_offset field in the slot is meaningless
and we don't need it.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove hp_slot field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:05:58+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:27:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=0e3631593c38e8a09bf58a46c6f6a3426d3ad0f0'/>
<id>0e3631593c38e8a09bf58a46c6f6a3426d3ad0f0</id>
<content type='text'>
The hp_slot field is to identify the slot under the same
controller. But, since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most,
it is meaningless and we don't need it.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The hp_slot field is to identify the slot under the same
controller. But, since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most,
it is meaningless and we don't need it.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove device field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:05:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:26:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=d689f7eb364a51ccd857605dede0d6c22a1aad91'/>
<id>d689f7eb364a51ccd857605dede0d6c22a1aad91</id>
<content type='text'>
The device field in the struct slot is not necessary because it is
always 0 in pciehp driver.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The device field in the struct slot is not necessary because it is
always 0 in pciehp driver.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove bus field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:05:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:26:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=ab9c6c86701b498445334db746aa2e8dc473c7b6'/>
<id>ab9c6c86701b498445334db746aa2e8dc473c7b6</id>
<content type='text'>
The bus field in struct slot is not necessary.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The bus field in struct slot is not necessary.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: pciehp: remove slot_list field</title>
<updated>2009-09-17T17:05:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-09-15T08:24:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=8720d27dabf580278a7719fa8b5783d9878e2d42'/>
<id>8720d27dabf580278a7719fa8b5783d9878e2d42</id>
<content type='text'>
Since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most, we don't need
'slot_list' linked list to manage multiple slots under the port.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most, we don't need
'slot_list' linked list to manage multiple slots under the port.

Acked-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI hotplug: remove redundant .owner initializations</title>
<updated>2009-06-16T21:30:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-06-16T02:02:02+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=a6c0d5c6ebb3d988b1f18a1612b5188f3f555637'/>
<id>a6c0d5c6ebb3d988b1f18a1612b5188f3f555637</id>
<content type='text'>
The "owner" field in struct hotplug_slot_ops is initialized by PCI
hotplug core. So each hotplug controller driver doesn't need to
initialize it.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The "owner" field in struct hotplug_slot_ops is initialized by PCI
hotplug core. So each hotplug controller driver doesn't need to
initialize it.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang &lt;achiang@hp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PCI: Remove untested Electromechanical Interlock (EMI) support in pciehp.</title>
<updated>2009-06-16T21:30:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kenji Kaneshige</name>
<email>kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com</email>
</author>
<published>2009-06-02T04:52:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=bd3d99c17039fd05a29587db3f4a180c48da115a'/>
<id>bd3d99c17039fd05a29587db3f4a180c48da115a</id>
<content type='text'>
The EMI support in pciehp is obviously broken. It is implemented using
struct hotplug_slot_attribute, but sysfs_ops for pci_slot_ktype is NOT
for struct hotplug_slot_attribute, but for struct pci_slot_attribute.
This bug had been there for a long time, maybe it was introduced when
PCI slot framework was introduced. The reason why this bug didn't
cause any problem is maybe the EMI support is not tested at all
because of lack of test environment.

As described above, the EMI support in pciehp seems not to be tested
at all. So this patch removes EMI support from pciehp, instead of
fixing the bug.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The EMI support in pciehp is obviously broken. It is implemented using
struct hotplug_slot_attribute, but sysfs_ops for pci_slot_ktype is NOT
for struct hotplug_slot_attribute, but for struct pci_slot_attribute.
This bug had been there for a long time, maybe it was introduced when
PCI slot framework was introduced. The reason why this bug didn't
cause any problem is maybe the EMI support is not tested at all
because of lack of test environment.

As described above, the EMI support in pciehp seems not to be tested
at all. So this patch removes EMI support from pciehp, instead of
fixing the bug.

Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige &lt;kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes &lt;jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
