Conflicts:

	drivers/pci/probe.c

Check the return value of device_create_bin_file in pci_create_bus and
unwind if necessary. Don't propagate error to caller, as failure to create
these files shouldn't prevent PCI from being initialised. Instead, just
log a warning.

Cc: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@stealer.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Disable ASPM on pre-1.1 PCIe devices, as many of them don't implement it
correctly.

Tested-by: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

If the kernel is configured to support 64-bit resources on a 32-bit
machine, we can support 64-bit BARs properly.  Just change the condition
to check sizeof(resource_size_t) instead of BITS_PER_LONG.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Factor out the code to read one BAR from the loop in pci_read_bases into
a new function, __pci_read_base.  The new code is slightly more
readable, better commented and removes the ifdef.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and
  disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power
  manageable by ACPI.

* Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent)
  subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up
  capability of given device.

* Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
  for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake().

* Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
  for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup().

* Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it
  into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(),
  allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of
  generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the
  device's PME# functionality, respectively.

* Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new
  PME#-related functions.

* Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not
  used any more.

* Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the
  power.can_wakeup flag of given device.

* Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is
  capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the
  PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its
  power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is
  unset as appropriate.

* Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be
  wake-up capable by it.

* Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that
  have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their
  wake-up power has been enabled).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

This changes pci_setup_device to handle pci_name() now returning a
constant string.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Make pci_setup_device() write the bus ID directly into the allotted storage,
rather than using pci_name() as the address as that now returns a const
pointer.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Convert printks to use dev_printk().

I converted pr_debug() to dev_dbg().  Both use KERN_DEBUG and are enabled
only when DEBUG is defined.

I converted printk(KERN_DEBUG) to dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG), not to dev_dbg(),
because dev_dbg() is only enabled when DEBUG is defined.

I converted DBG(KERN_INFO) (only in setup-bus.c) to dev_info().  The DBG()
name makes it sound like debug, but it's been enabled forever, so dev_info()
preserves the previous behavior.

I tried to make the resource assignment formats more consistent, e.g.,
  "BAR %d: got res [%#llx-%#llx] bus [%#llx-%#llx] flags %#lx\n"
instead of sometimes using "start-end" and sometimes using "size@start".
I'm not attached to one or the other; I'd just like them consistent.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>