linux-toradex.git/drivers/thermal, branch v3.18.10

tick/powerclamp: Remove tick_nohz_idle abuse

2015-01-27T16:29:37+00:00

commit a5fd9733a30d18d7ac23f17080e7e07bb3205b69 upstream.

commit 4dbd27711cd9 "tick: export nohz tick idle symbols for module
use" was merged via the thermal tree without an explicit ack from the
relevant maintainers.

The exports are abused by the intel powerclamp driver which implements
a fake idle state from a sched FIFO task. This causes all kinds of
wreckage in the NOHZ core code which rightfully assumes that
tick_nohz_idle_enter/exit() are only called from the idle task itself.

Recent changes in the NOHZ core lead to a failure of the powerclamp
driver and now people try to hack completely broken and backwards
workarounds into the NOHZ core code. This is completely unacceptable
and just papers over the real problem. There are way more subtle
issues lurking around the corner.

The real solution is to fix the powerclamp driver by rewriting it with
a sane concept, but that's beyond the scope of this.

So the only solution for now is to remove the calls into the core NOHZ
code from the powerclamp trainwreck along with the exports.

Fixes: d6d71ee4a14a "PM: Introduce Intel PowerClamp Driver"
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Preeti U Murthy 
Cc: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
Cc: Fengguang Wu 
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker 
Cc: Pan Jacob jun 
Cc: LKP 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Zhang Rui 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1412181110110.17382@nanos
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

thermal: Fix error path in thermal_init()

2015-01-08T18:30:24+00:00

commit 9d367e5e7b05c71a8c1ac4e9b6e00ba45a79f2fc upstream.

thermal_unregister_governors() and class_unregister() were being called in
the wrong order.

Fixes: 80a26a5c22b9 ("Thermal: build thermal governors into thermal_sys module")
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

thermal: Exynos: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls

2014-11-21T19:20:17+00:00

The functions cpufreq_cooling_unregister() and thermal_zone_device_unregister()
test whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

thermal: sti: Ignore suspend/resume functions when !PM_SLEEP

2014-11-21T18:27:37+00:00

Prevents build warning:

st_thermal.c:278:12:
    warning: ‘st_thermal_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
st_thermal.c:286:12:
    warning: ‘st_thermal_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin 
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with thermal constraints

2014-11-20T22:17:11+00:00

Existing code updates cupfreq policy only while executing
cpufreq_apply_cooling() function (i.e. when notify_device != NOTIFY_INVALID).
It doesn't apply constraints when cpufreq policy update happens from any other
place but it should update the cpufreq policy with thermal constraints every
time when there is a cpufreq policy update, to keep state of
cpufreq_cooling_device and max_feq of cpufreq policy in sync. For instance
while resuming cpufreq updates cpufreq_policy and it restores default
policy->usr_policy values irrespective of cooling device's cpufreq_state since
notification gets missed because (notify_device == NOTIFY_INVALID).
Another problem, is that userspace is able to change max_freq irrespective of
cooling device's state, as notification gets missed.

This patch modifies code to maintain a global cpufreq_dev_list and applies
constraints of all matching cooling devices for policy's cpu when there is any
policy update(ends up applying the lowest max_freq among the matching cpu
cooling devices).

This patch also removes redundant check (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max),
as cpufreq framework takes care of user_policy constraints already where ever
required, otherwise its causing an issue while increasing max_freq in normal
scenerio as it restores max_freq with policy->user_policy.max which is old
(smaller) value.

Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

imx: thermal: imx_get_temp might be called before sensor clock is prepared

2014-11-09T19:42:53+00:00

imx_get_temp might be called before the sensor clock is prepared
thus resulting in a timeout of the first attempt to read temp:
thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone 0
Happened to me on a Utilite Standard with IMX6 Dual SoC.

Reason is that in imx_thermal_probe thermal_zone_device_register
is called before the sensor clock is prepared.
thermal_zone_device_register however calls
thermal_zone_device_update which eventually calls imx_get_temp.

Fix this by preparing the clock before calling
thermal_zone_device_register.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

thermal: exynos: use correct offset for TMU_CONTROL register on Exynos5260

2014-11-07T18:52:42+00:00

In exynos5260_tmu_registers tmu_ctrl entry is erroneously
assigned twice.  The second assignment (to EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL1
define which represents 0x24 value) overrides the first one
(to EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL define which represents 0x20 value)
which results in the wrong (according to the Exynos5260 SoC
documentation that I have) offset being used for TMU_CONTROL
register.  Fix it by removing the wrong assignment and then
remove no longer used EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL1 define.

Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap 
Cc: Lukasz Majewski 
Cc: Eduardo Valentin 
Cc: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

thermal: imx: correct driver load sequence for cpu cooling

2014-11-07T18:44:41+00:00

thermal driver should be regisetered after cpufreq driver has
been registered and probed. Doing so is to make sure that thermal
driver can get the max cpu cooling states correctly when calling
get_property.

Signed-off-by: Bai Ping 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

Thermal/int3403: Fix thermal hysteresis unit conversion

2014-11-04T23:17:32+00:00

Thermal hysteresis represents a temperature difference.
But the original code treats it as a temperature value,
Convert it from tenths of degree Kelvin to Milli-Celsius
by deducing 273200. This is not right.

Kelvin and Celsius have same degree size. From temperature
difference view, the conversion between tenths of degree
Kelvin unit and Milli-Celsius unit is just to multiply 100.

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu 
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

Thermal:Remove usless if(!result) before return tz

2014-11-03T22:59:50+00:00

result is always zero when comes here.

Signed-off-by: Yao Dongdong 
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin