linux-toradex.git/drivers, branch v3.2.74 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules scsi_sysfs: Fix queue_ramp_up_period return code 2015-11-27T12:48:24+00:00 Peter Oberparleiter oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2015-10-27T09:49:54+00:00 74d26be3e560b7d8b2abca3dcb5430e9893d1767 commit 863e02d0e173bb9d8cea6861be22820b25c076cc upstream. Writing a number to /sys/bus/scsi/devices/<sdev>/queue_ramp_up_period returns the value of that number instead of the number of bytes written. This behavior can confuse programs expecting POSIX write() semantics. Fix this by returning the number of bytes written instead. Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 863e02d0e173bb9d8cea6861be22820b25c076cc upstream.

Writing a number to /sys/bus/scsi/devices/<sdev>/queue_ramp_up_period
returns the value of that number instead of the number of bytes written.
This behavior can confuse programs expecting POSIX write() semantics.
Fix this by returning the number of bytes written instead.

Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
scsi: restart list search after unlock in scsi_remove_target 2015-11-27T12:48:23+00:00 Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de 2015-10-19T14:35:46+00:00 67022ef102acafab56301d3e87ba7c4a3ee1b406 commit 40998193560dab6c3ce8d25f4fa58a23e252ef38 upstream. When dropping a lock while iterating a list we must restart the search as other threads could have manipulated the list under us. Without this we can get stuck in an endless loop. This bug was introduced by commit bc3f02a795d3b4faa99d37390174be2a75d091bd Author: Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com> Date: Tue Aug 28 22:12:10 2012 -0700 [SCSI] scsi_remove_target: fix softlockup regression on hot remove Which was itself trying to fix a reported soft lockup issue http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1348679 However, we believe even with this revert of the original patch, the soft lockup problem has been fixed by commit f2495e228fce9f9cec84367547813cbb0d6db15a Author: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com> Date: Tue Jan 21 07:01:41 2014 -0800 [SCSI] dual scan thread bug fix Thanks go to Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> for tracking all this prior history down. Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Fixes: bc3f02a795d3b4faa99d37390174be2a75d091bd Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Odin.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 40998193560dab6c3ce8d25f4fa58a23e252ef38 upstream.

When dropping a lock while iterating a list we must restart the search
as other threads could have manipulated the list under us.  Without this
we can get stuck in an endless loop.  This bug was introduced by

commit bc3f02a795d3b4faa99d37390174be2a75d091bd
Author: Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 28 22:12:10 2012 -0700

    [SCSI] scsi_remove_target: fix softlockup regression on hot remove

Which was itself trying to fix a reported soft lockup issue

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1348679

However, we believe even with this revert of the original patch, the soft
lockup problem has been fixed by

commit f2495e228fce9f9cec84367547813cbb0d6db15a
Author: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 21 07:01:41 2014 -0800

    [SCSI] dual scan thread bug fix

Thanks go to Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> for tracking all this
prior history down.

Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Fixes: bc3f02a795d3b4faa99d37390174be2a75d091bd
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Odin.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
firewire: ohci: fix JMicron JMB38x IT context discovery 2015-11-27T12:48:23+00:00 Stefan Richter stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de 2015-11-03T00:46:21+00:00 785381e98b73f87174d78b0ae4ba799a32eb882f commit 100ceb66d5c40cc0c7018e06a9474302470be73c upstream. Reported by Clifford and Craig for JMicron OHCI-1394 + SDHCI combo controllers: Often or even most of the time, the controller is initialized with the message "added OHCI v1.10 device as card 0, 4 IR + 0 IT contexts, quirks 0x10". With 0 isochronous transmit DMA contexts (IT contexts), applications like audio output are impossible. However, OHCI-1394 demands that at least 4 IT contexts are implemented by the link layer controller, and indeed JMicron JMB38x do implement four of them. Only their IsoXmitIntMask register is unreliable at early access. With my own JMB381 single function controller I found: - I can reproduce the problem with a lower probability than Craig's. - If I put a loop around the section which clears and reads IsoXmitIntMask, then either the first or the second attempt will return the correct initial mask of 0x0000000f. I never encountered a case of needing more than a second attempt. - Consequently, if I put a dummy reg_read(...IsoXmitIntMaskSet) before the first write, the subsequent read will return the correct result. - If I merely ignore a wrong read result and force the known real result, later isochronous transmit DMA usage works just fine. So let's just fix this chip bug up by the latter method. Tested with JMB381 on kernel 3.13 and 4.3. Since OHCI-1394 generally requires 4 IT contexts at a minium, this workaround is simply applied whenever the initial read of IsoXmitIntMask returns 0, regardless whether it's a JMicron chip or not. I never heard of this issue together with any other chip though. I am not 100% sure that this fix works on the OHCI-1394 part of JMB380 and JMB388 combo controllers exactly the same as on the JMB381 single- function controller, but so far I haven't had a chance to let an owner of a combo chip run a patched kernel. Strangely enough, IsoRecvIntMask is always reported correctly, even though it is probed right before IsoXmitIntMask. Reported-by: Clifford Dunn Reported-by: Craig Moore <craig.moore@qenos.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: log with fw_notify() instead of ohci_notice()] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 100ceb66d5c40cc0c7018e06a9474302470be73c upstream.

Reported by Clifford and Craig for JMicron OHCI-1394 + SDHCI combo
controllers:  Often or even most of the time, the controller is
initialized with the message "added OHCI v1.10 device as card 0, 4 IR +
0 IT contexts, quirks 0x10".  With 0 isochronous transmit DMA contexts
(IT contexts), applications like audio output are impossible.

However, OHCI-1394 demands that at least 4 IT contexts are implemented
by the link layer controller, and indeed JMicron JMB38x do implement
four of them.  Only their IsoXmitIntMask register is unreliable at early
access.

With my own JMB381 single function controller I found:
  - I can reproduce the problem with a lower probability than Craig's.
  - If I put a loop around the section which clears and reads
    IsoXmitIntMask, then either the first or the second attempt will
    return the correct initial mask of 0x0000000f.  I never encountered
    a case of needing more than a second attempt.
  - Consequently, if I put a dummy reg_read(...IsoXmitIntMaskSet)
    before the first write, the subsequent read will return the correct
    result.
  - If I merely ignore a wrong read result and force the known real
    result, later isochronous transmit DMA usage works just fine.

So let's just fix this chip bug up by the latter method.  Tested with
JMB381 on kernel 3.13 and 4.3.

Since OHCI-1394 generally requires 4 IT contexts at a minium, this
workaround is simply applied whenever the initial read of IsoXmitIntMask
returns 0, regardless whether it's a JMicron chip or not.  I never heard
of this issue together with any other chip though.

I am not 100% sure that this fix works on the OHCI-1394 part of JMB380
and JMB388 combo controllers exactly the same as on the JMB381 single-
function controller, but so far I haven't had a chance to let an owner
of a combo chip run a patched kernel.

Strangely enough, IsoRecvIntMask is always reported correctly, even
though it is probed right before IsoXmitIntMask.

Reported-by: Clifford Dunn
Reported-by: Craig Moore <craig.moore@qenos.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: log with fw_notify() instead of ohci_notice()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
megaraid_sas : SMAP restriction--do not access user memory from IOCTL code 2015-11-27T12:48:22+00:00 sumit.saxena@avagotech.com sumit.saxena@avagotech.com 2015-10-15T08:10:54+00:00 f7e70badb0ee4fb9737bf9793e17eedd907b68f8 commit 323c4a02c631d00851d8edc4213c4d184ef83647 upstream. This is an issue on SMAP enabled CPUs and 32 bit apps running on 64 bit OS. Do not access user memory from kernel code. The SMAP bit restricts accessing user memory from kernel code. Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 323c4a02c631d00851d8edc4213c4d184ef83647 upstream.

This is an issue on SMAP enabled CPUs and 32 bit apps running on 64 bit
OS. Do not access user memory from kernel code. The SMAP bit restricts
accessing user memory from kernel code.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com>
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mtd: blkdevs: fix potential deadlock + lockdep warnings 2015-11-27T12:48:22+00:00 Brian Norris computersforpeace@gmail.com 2015-10-26T17:20:23+00:00 419608b9adde80d8638daa01c8614e1b92416fc0 commit f3c63795e90f0c6238306883b6c72f14d5355721 upstream. Commit 073db4a51ee4 ("mtd: fix: avoid race condition when accessing mtd->usecount") fixed a race condition but due to poor ordering of the mutex acquisition, introduced a potential deadlock. The deadlock can occur, for example, when rmmod'ing the m25p80 module, which will delete one or more MTDs, along with any corresponding mtdblock devices. This could potentially race with an acquisition of the block device as follows. -> blktrans_open() -> mutex_lock(&dev->lock); -> mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex); -> del_mtd_device() -> mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex); -> blktrans_notify_remove() -> del_mtd_blktrans_dev() -> mutex_lock(&dev->lock); This is a classic (potential) ABBA deadlock, which can be fixed by making the A->B ordering consistent everywhere. There was no real purpose to the ordering in the original patch, AFAIR, so this shouldn't be a problem. This ordering was actually already present in del_mtd_blktrans_dev(), for one, where the function tried to ensure that its caller already held mtd_table_mutex before it acquired &dev->lock: if (mutex_trylock(&mtd_table_mutex)) { mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex); BUG(); } So, reverse the ordering of acquisition of &dev->lock and &mtd_table_mutex so we always acquire mtd_table_mutex first. Snippets of the lockdep output follow: # modprobe -r m25p80 [ 53.419251] [ 53.420838] ====================================================== [ 53.427300] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 53.433865] 4.3.0-rc6 #96 Not tainted [ 53.437686] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 53.444220] modprobe/372 is trying to acquire lock: [ 53.449320] (&new->lock){+.+...}, at: [<c043fe4c>] del_mtd_blktrans_dev+0x80/0xdc [ 53.457271] [ 53.457271] but task is already holding lock: [ 53.463372] (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0439994>] del_mtd_device+0x18/0x100 [ 53.471321] [ 53.471321] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 53.471321] [ 53.479856] [ 53.479856] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 53.487660] -> #1 (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.+.}: [ 53.492331] [<c043fc5c>] blktrans_open+0x34/0x1a4 [ 53.497879] [<c01afce0>] __blkdev_get+0xc4/0x3b0 [ 53.503364] [<c01b0bb8>] blkdev_get+0x108/0x320 [ 53.508743] [<c01713c0>] do_dentry_open+0x218/0x314 [ 53.514496] [<c0180454>] path_openat+0x4c0/0xf9c [ 53.519959] [<c0182044>] do_filp_open+0x5c/0xc0 [ 53.525336] [<c0172758>] do_sys_open+0xfc/0x1cc [ 53.530716] [<c000f740>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c [ 53.536375] -> #0 (&new->lock){+.+...}: [ 53.540587] [<c063f124>] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x3cc [ 53.546504] [<c043fe4c>] del_mtd_blktrans_dev+0x80/0xdc [ 53.552606] [<c043f164>] blktrans_notify_remove+0x7c/0x84 [ 53.558891] [<c04399f0>] del_mtd_device+0x74/0x100 [ 53.564544] [<c043c670>] del_mtd_partitions+0x80/0xc8 [ 53.570451] [<c0439aa0>] mtd_device_unregister+0x24/0x48 [ 53.576637] [<c046ce6c>] spi_drv_remove+0x1c/0x34 [ 53.582207] [<c03de0f0>] __device_release_driver+0x88/0x114 [ 53.588663] [<c03de19c>] device_release_driver+0x20/0x2c [ 53.594843] [<c03dd9e8>] bus_remove_device+0xd8/0x108 [ 53.600748] [<c03dacc0>] device_del+0x10c/0x210 [ 53.606127] [<c03dadd0>] device_unregister+0xc/0x20 [ 53.611849] [<c046d878>] __unregister+0x10/0x20 [ 53.617211] [<c03da868>] device_for_each_child+0x50/0x7c [ 53.623387] [<c046eae8>] spi_unregister_master+0x58/0x8c [ 53.629578] [<c03e12f0>] release_nodes+0x15c/0x1c8 [ 53.635223] [<c03de0f8>] __device_release_driver+0x90/0x114 [ 53.641689] [<c03de900>] driver_detach+0xb4/0xb8 [ 53.647147] [<c03ddc78>] bus_remove_driver+0x4c/0xa0 [ 53.652970] [<c00cab50>] SyS_delete_module+0x11c/0x1e4 [ 53.658976] [<c000f740>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c [ 53.664621] [ 53.664621] other info that might help us debug this: [ 53.664621] [ 53.672979] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 53.672979] [ 53.679169] CPU0 CPU1 [ 53.683900] ---- ---- [ 53.688633] lock(mtd_table_mutex); [ 53.692383] lock(&new->lock); [ 53.698306] lock(mtd_table_mutex); [ 53.704658] lock(&new->lock); [ 53.707946] [ 53.707946] *** DEADLOCK *** Fixes: 073db4a51ee4 ("mtd: fix: avoid race condition when accessing mtd->usecount") Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Tested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit f3c63795e90f0c6238306883b6c72f14d5355721 upstream.

Commit 073db4a51ee4 ("mtd: fix: avoid race condition when accessing
mtd->usecount") fixed a race condition but due to poor ordering of the
mutex acquisition, introduced a potential deadlock.

The deadlock can occur, for example, when rmmod'ing the m25p80 module, which
will delete one or more MTDs, along with any corresponding mtdblock
devices. This could potentially race with an acquisition of the block
device as follows.

 -> blktrans_open()
    ->  mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
    ->  mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex);

 -> del_mtd_device()
    ->  mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex);
    ->  blktrans_notify_remove() -> del_mtd_blktrans_dev()
       ->  mutex_lock(&dev->lock);

This is a classic (potential) ABBA deadlock, which can be fixed by
making the A->B ordering consistent everywhere. There was no real
purpose to the ordering in the original patch, AFAIR, so this shouldn't
be a problem. This ordering was actually already present in
del_mtd_blktrans_dev(), for one, where the function tried to ensure that
its caller already held mtd_table_mutex before it acquired &dev->lock:

        if (mutex_trylock(&mtd_table_mutex)) {
                mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex);
                BUG();
        }

So, reverse the ordering of acquisition of &dev->lock and &mtd_table_mutex so
we always acquire mtd_table_mutex first.

Snippets of the lockdep output follow:

  # modprobe -r m25p80
  [   53.419251]
  [   53.420838] ======================================================
  [   53.427300] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
  [   53.433865] 4.3.0-rc6 #96 Not tainted
  [   53.437686] -------------------------------------------------------
  [   53.444220] modprobe/372 is trying to acquire lock:
  [   53.449320]  (&new->lock){+.+...}, at: [<c043fe4c>] del_mtd_blktrans_dev+0x80/0xdc
  [   53.457271]
  [   53.457271] but task is already holding lock:
  [   53.463372]  (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0439994>] del_mtd_device+0x18/0x100
  [   53.471321]
  [   53.471321] which lock already depends on the new lock.
  [   53.471321]
  [   53.479856]
  [   53.479856] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  [   53.487660]
  -> #1 (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.+.}:
  [   53.492331]        [<c043fc5c>] blktrans_open+0x34/0x1a4
  [   53.497879]        [<c01afce0>] __blkdev_get+0xc4/0x3b0
  [   53.503364]        [<c01b0bb8>] blkdev_get+0x108/0x320
  [   53.508743]        [<c01713c0>] do_dentry_open+0x218/0x314
  [   53.514496]        [<c0180454>] path_openat+0x4c0/0xf9c
  [   53.519959]        [<c0182044>] do_filp_open+0x5c/0xc0
  [   53.525336]        [<c0172758>] do_sys_open+0xfc/0x1cc
  [   53.530716]        [<c000f740>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
  [   53.536375]
  -> #0 (&new->lock){+.+...}:
  [   53.540587]        [<c063f124>] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x3cc
  [   53.546504]        [<c043fe4c>] del_mtd_blktrans_dev+0x80/0xdc
  [   53.552606]        [<c043f164>] blktrans_notify_remove+0x7c/0x84
  [   53.558891]        [<c04399f0>] del_mtd_device+0x74/0x100
  [   53.564544]        [<c043c670>] del_mtd_partitions+0x80/0xc8
  [   53.570451]        [<c0439aa0>] mtd_device_unregister+0x24/0x48
  [   53.576637]        [<c046ce6c>] spi_drv_remove+0x1c/0x34
  [   53.582207]        [<c03de0f0>] __device_release_driver+0x88/0x114
  [   53.588663]        [<c03de19c>] device_release_driver+0x20/0x2c
  [   53.594843]        [<c03dd9e8>] bus_remove_device+0xd8/0x108
  [   53.600748]        [<c03dacc0>] device_del+0x10c/0x210
  [   53.606127]        [<c03dadd0>] device_unregister+0xc/0x20
  [   53.611849]        [<c046d878>] __unregister+0x10/0x20
  [   53.617211]        [<c03da868>] device_for_each_child+0x50/0x7c
  [   53.623387]        [<c046eae8>] spi_unregister_master+0x58/0x8c
  [   53.629578]        [<c03e12f0>] release_nodes+0x15c/0x1c8
  [   53.635223]        [<c03de0f8>] __device_release_driver+0x90/0x114
  [   53.641689]        [<c03de900>] driver_detach+0xb4/0xb8
  [   53.647147]        [<c03ddc78>] bus_remove_driver+0x4c/0xa0
  [   53.652970]        [<c00cab50>] SyS_delete_module+0x11c/0x1e4
  [   53.658976]        [<c000f740>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
  [   53.664621]
  [   53.664621] other info that might help us debug this:
  [   53.664621]
  [   53.672979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
  [   53.672979]
  [   53.679169]        CPU0                    CPU1
  [   53.683900]        ----                    ----
  [   53.688633]   lock(mtd_table_mutex);
  [   53.692383]                                lock(&new->lock);
  [   53.698306]                                lock(mtd_table_mutex);
  [   53.704658]   lock(&new->lock);
  [   53.707946]
  [   53.707946]  *** DEADLOCK ***

Fixes: 073db4a51ee4 ("mtd: fix: avoid race condition when accessing mtd->usecount")
Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Tested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
can: Use correct type in sizeof() in nla_put() 2015-11-27T12:48:22+00:00 Marek Vasut marex@denx.de 2015-10-30T12:48:19+00:00 78f78e5a5d77e95575059443ce3b9b3446e7398a commit 562b103a21974c2f9cd67514d110f918bb3e1796 upstream. The sizeof() is invoked on an incorrect variable, likely due to some copy-paste error, and this might result in memory corruption. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: - Keep using the old NLA_PUT macro - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 562b103a21974c2f9cd67514d110f918bb3e1796 upstream.

The sizeof() is invoked on an incorrect variable, likely due to some
copy-paste error, and this might result in memory corruption. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Keep using the old NLA_PUT macro
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
megaraid_sas: Do not use PAGE_SIZE for max_sectors 2015-11-27T12:48:22+00:00 sumit.saxena@avagotech.com sumit.saxena@avagotech.com 2015-10-15T08:10:04+00:00 5e9c1dca8eb475a3f3e216cccf18f56dcdc7e6d8 commit 357ae967ad66e357f78b5cfb5ab6ca07fb4a7758 upstream. Do not use PAGE_SIZE marco to calculate max_sectors per I/O request. Driver code assumes PAGE_SIZE will be always 4096 which can lead to wrongly calculated value if PAGE_SIZE is not 4096. This issue was reported in Ubuntu Bugzilla Bug #1475166. Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 357ae967ad66e357f78b5cfb5ab6ca07fb4a7758 upstream.

Do not use PAGE_SIZE marco to calculate max_sectors per I/O
request. Driver code assumes PAGE_SIZE will be always 4096 which can
lead to wrongly calculated value if PAGE_SIZE is not 4096. This issue
was reported in Ubuntu Bugzilla Bug #1475166.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com>
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
ACPI: Use correct IRQ when uninstalling ACPI interrupt handler 2015-11-27T12:48:21+00:00 Chen Yu yu.c.chen@intel.com 2015-10-24T17:02:19+00:00 bf177657504c6091395f7dd7e5916770113df60b commit 49e4b84333f338d4f183f28f1f3c1131b9fb2b5a upstream. Currently when the system is trying to uninstall the ACPI interrupt handler, it uses acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt as the IRQ number. However, the IRQ number that the ACPI interrupt handled is installed for comes from acpi_gsi_to_irq() and that is the number that should be used for the handler removal. Fix this problem by using the mapped IRQ returned from acpi_gsi_to_irq() as appropriate. Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 49e4b84333f338d4f183f28f1f3c1131b9fb2b5a upstream.

Currently when the system is trying to uninstall the ACPI interrupt
handler, it uses acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt as the IRQ number.
However, the IRQ number that the ACPI interrupt handled is installed
for comes from acpi_gsi_to_irq() and that is the number that should
be used for the handler removal.

Fix this problem by using the mapped IRQ returned from acpi_gsi_to_irq()
as appropriate.

Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
staging: rtl8712: Add device ID for Sitecom WLA2100 2015-11-27T12:48:21+00:00 Larry Finger Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net 2015-10-19T03:14:48+00:00 e936d80d4d24e79fe2fd038d33f56830391838c2 commit 1e6e63283691a2a9048a35d9c6c59cf0abd342e4 upstream. This adds the USB ID for the Sitecom WLA2100. The Windows 10 inf file was checked to verify that the addition is correct. Reported-by: Frans van de Wiel <fvdw@fvdw.eu> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Cc: Frans van de Wiel <fvdw@fvdw.eu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 1e6e63283691a2a9048a35d9c6c59cf0abd342e4 upstream.

This adds the USB ID for the Sitecom WLA2100. The Windows 10 inf file
was checked to verify that the addition is correct.

Reported-by: Frans van de Wiel <fvdw@fvdw.eu>
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Frans van de Wiel <fvdw@fvdw.eu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Bluetooth: ath3k: Add support of AR3012 0cf3:817b device 2015-11-27T12:48:21+00:00 Dmitry Tunin hanipouspilot@gmail.com 2015-10-16T08:45:26+00:00 2b42ac30d4a874fb3360562f67ebf6a90afc1794 commit 18e0afab8ce3f1230ce3fef52b2e73374fd9c0e7 upstream. T: Bus=04 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=04 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0cf3 ProdID=817b Rev=00.02 C: #Ifs= 2 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506615 Signed-off-by: Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 18e0afab8ce3f1230ce3fef52b2e73374fd9c0e7 upstream.

T: Bus=04 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=04 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=0cf3 ProdID=817b Rev=00.02
C: #Ifs= 2 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA
I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506615

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>