linux-toradex.git/fs/affs/affs.h, branch v3.12.9

userns: Convert affs to use kuid/kgid wherwe appropriate

2012-09-21T10:13:30+00:00

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn 
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman

don't pass nameidata to ->create()

2012-07-14T12:34:47+00:00

boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead;
Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed
not to be there yet.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

stop passing nameidata to ->lookup()

2012-07-14T12:34:32+00:00

Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
legitimate uses for such argument.  And getting rid of that
completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

affs: get rid of affs_sync_super

2012-07-14T12:32:45+00:00

This patch makes affs stop using the VFS '->write_super()' method along with
the 's_dirt' superblock flag, because they are on their way out.

The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
writes out all dirty superblocks using the '->write_super()' call-back.  But the
problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
'->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
it together with the kernel thread.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

affs: introduce VFS superblock object back-reference

2012-07-14T12:32:45+00:00

Add an 'sb' VFS superblock back-reference to the 'struct affs_sb_info' data
structure - we will need to find the VFS superblock from a 'struct
affs_sb_info' object in the next patch, so this change is jut a preparation.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

affs: bury unused macros

2012-05-30T03:28:34+00:00

... unused since 2.4.4.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

affs: propagate umode_t

2012-01-04T03:55:04+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

switch ->create() to umode_t

2012-01-04T03:54:53+00:00

vfs_create() ignores everything outside of 16bit subset of its
mode argument; switching it to umode_t is obviously equivalent
and it's the only caller of the method

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

switch vfs_mkdir() and ->mkdir() to umode_t

2012-01-04T03:54:53+00:00

vfs_mkdir() gets int, but immediately drops everything that might not
fit into umode_t and that's the only caller of ->mkdir()...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers

2011-07-21T00:47:59+00:00

Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
Thanks,

Acked-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro