Daniel Blueman reported a bug with fio+balance on a ramdisk setup.
Basically what happens is the balance relocates a tree block which will drop
the implicit refs for all of its children and adds a full backref.  Once the
block is relocated we have to add the implicit refs back, so when we cow the
block again we add the implicit refs for its children back.  The problem
comes when the original drop ref doesn't get run before we add the implicit
refs back.  The delayed ref stuff will specifically prefer ADD operations
over DROP to keep us from freeing up an extent that will have references to
it, so we try to add the implicit ref before it is actually removed and we
panic.  This worked fine before because the add would have just canceled the
drop out and we would have been fine.  But the backref walking work needs to
be able to freeze the delayed ref stuff in time so we have this ever
increasing sequence number that gets attached to all new delayed ref updates
which makes us not merge refs and we run into this issue.

So to fix this we need to merge delayed refs.  So everytime we run a
clustered ref we need to try and merge all of its delayed refs.  The backref
walking stuff locks the delayed ref head before processing, so if we have it
locked we are safe to merge any refs inside of the sequence number.  If
there is no sequence number we can merge all refs.  Doing this not only
fixes our bug but keeps the delayed ref code from adding and removing
useless refs and batching together multiple refs into one search instead of
one search per delayed ref, which will really help our commit times.  I ran
this with Daniels test and 276 and I haven't seen any problems.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Commit a168650c introduced a waiting mechanism to prevent busy waiting in
btrfs_run_delayed_refs. This can deadlock with btrfs_run_ordered_operations,
where a tree_mod_seq is held while waiting for the io to complete, while
the end_io calls btrfs_run_delayed_refs.
This whole mechanism is unnecessary. If not enough runnable refs are
available to satisfy count, just return as count is more like a guideline
than a strict requirement.
In case we have to run all refs, commit transaction makes sure that no
other threads are working in the transaction anymore, so we just assert
here that no refs are blocked.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Hooks into qgroup code to record refs and into transaction commit.
This is the main entry point for qgroup. Basically every change in
extent backrefs got accounted to the appropriate qgroups.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

We've got two mechanisms both required for reliable backref resolving (tree
mod log and holding back delayed refs). You cannot make use of one without
the other. So instead of requiring the user of this mechanism to setup both
correctly, we join them into a single interface.

Additionally, we stop inserting non-blockers into fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list
as we did before, which was of no value.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

The sequence number for delayed refs is needed to postpone certain delayed
refs for a very short period while walking backrefs. Before the tree
modification log, we thought we'd only have to hold back those references
that don't have a counter operation.

While now we've the tree mod log, we're rewinding fs tree blocks to a
defined consistent state. We cannot know in advance for which tree block
we'll be doing rewind operations later. Therefore, we must postpone all the
delayed refs for fs-tree blocks, even those having a counter operation.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

Correctness fix: The kfree calls in the add_delayed_* functions free
the node that's passed into it, but the node is a member of another
structure. It works because it's always the first member of the
containing structure, but it should really be using the containing
structure itself.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

Now that we may be holding back delayed refs for a limited period, we
might end up having no runnable delayed refs. Without this commit, we'd
do busy waiting in that thread until another (runnable) ref arives.
Instead, we're detecting this situation and use a waitqueue, such that
we only try to run more refs after
	a) another runnable ref was added  or
	b) delayed refs are no longer held back

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

When processing a delayed ref, first check if there are still old refs in
the process of being added. If so, put this ref back to the tree. To avoid
looping on this ref, choose a newer one in the next loop.
btrfs_find_ref_cluster has to take care of that.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Sequence numbers are needed to reconstruct the backrefs of a given extent to
a certain point in time. The total set of backrefs consist of the set of
backrefs recorded on disk plus the enqueued delayed refs for it that existed
at that moment.

This patch also adds a list that records all delayed refs which are
currently in the process of being added.

When walking all refs of an extent in btrfs_find_all_roots(), we freeze the
current state of delayed refs, honor anythinh up to this point and prevent
processing newer delayed refs to assert consistency.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>