I was using i_mutex for this, but we're getting bogus lockdep warnings by doing
that and theres no real way to get rid of those, so just stop using i_mutex to
protect delalloc metadata reservations and use a delalloc mutex instead.  This
shouldn't be contended often at all, only if you are writing and mmap writing to
the file at the same time.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value
from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to
determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups.

Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they
don't change subvol quota.

Also pass in the fs_info for later use.

btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are
for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a
certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to
those delayed refs.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Running xfstests 269 with some tracing my scripts kept spitting out errors about
releasing bytes that we didn't actually have reserved.  This took me down a huge
rabbit hole and it turns out the way we deal with reserved_extents is wrong,
we need to only be setting it if the reservation succeeds, otherwise the free()
method will come in and unreserve space that isn't actually reserved yet, which
can lead to other warnings and such.  The math was all working out right in the
end, but it caused all sorts of other issues in addition to making my scripts
yell and scream and generally make it impossible for me to track down the
original issue I was looking for.  The other problem is with our error handling
in the reservation code.  There are two cases that we need to deal with

1) We raced with free.  In this case free won't free anything because csum_bytes
is modified before we dro the lock in our reservation path, so free rightly
doesn't release any space because the reservation code may be depending on that
reservation.  However if we fail, we need the reservation side to do the free at
that point since that space is no longer in use.  So as it stands the code was
doing this fine and it worked out, except in case #2

2) We don't race with free.  Nobody comes in and changes anything, and our
reservation fails.  In this case we didn't reserve anything anyway and we just
need to clean up csum_bytes but not free anything.  So we keep track of
csum_bytes before we drop the lock and if it hasn't changed we know we can just
decrement csum_bytes and carry on.

Because of the case where we can race with free()'s since we have to drop our
spin_lock to do the reservation, I'm going to serialize all reservations with
the i_mutex.  We already get this for free in the heavy use paths, truncate and
file write all hold the i_mutex, just needed to add it to page_mkwrite and
various ioctl/balance things.  With this patch my space leak scripts no longer
scream bloody murder.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

If the root node of a fs/file tree is in the block group that is
being relocated, but the others are not in the other block groups.
when we create a snapshot for this tree between the relocation tree
creation ends and ->create_reloc_tree is set to 0, Btrfs will create
some backref nodes that are the lowest nodes of the backrefs cache.
But we forget to add them into ->leaves list of the backref cache
and deal with them, and at last, they will triggered BUG_ON().

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:239!

This patch fixes it by adding them into ->leaves list of backref cache.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

Offset field in data extent backref can underflow if clone range ioctl
is used. We can reliably detect the underflow because max file size is
limited to 2^63 and max data extent size is limited by block group size.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan  <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>

Currently btrfs_block_rsv_check does 2 things, it will either refill a block
reserve like in the truncate or refill case, or it will check to see if there is
enough space in the global reserve and possibly refill it.  However because of
overcommit we could be well overcommitting ourselves just to try and refill the
global reserve, when really we should just be committing the transaction.  So
breack this out into btrfs_block_rsv_refill and btrfs_block_rsv_check.  Refill
will try to reserve more metadata if it can and btrfs_block_rsv_check will not,
it will only tell you if the factor of the total space is still reserved.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

Johannes pointed out we were allocating only kernel pages for doing writes,
which is kind of a big deal if you are on 32bit and have more than a gig of ram.
So fix our allocations to use the mapping's gfp but still clear __GFP_FS so we
don't re-enter.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

The only thing that we need to have a trans handle for is in
reserve_metadata_bytes and thats to know how much flushing we can do.  So
instead of passing it around, just check current->journal_info for a
trans_handle so we know if we can commit a transaction to try and free up space
or not.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

If you run xfstest 224 it you will get lots of messages about not being able to
delete inodes and that they will be cleaned up next mount.  This is because
btrfs_block_rsv_check was not calling reserve_metadata_bytes with the ability to
flush, so if there was not enough space, it simply failed.  But in truncate and
evict case we could easily flush space to try and get enough space to do our
work, so make btrfs_block_rsv_check take a flush argument to pass down to
reserve_metadata_bytes.  Now xfstests 224 runs fine without all those
complaints.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>