linux-toradex.git/fs/crypto, branch v5.16 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules fscrypt: improve a few comments 2021-10-26T02:11:50+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-10-26T02:10:42+00:00 b7e072f9b77f4c516df96e0c22ec09f8b2e76ba1 Improve a few comments. These were extracted from the patch "fscrypt: add support for hardware-wrapped keys" (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211021181608.54127-4-ebiggers@kernel.org). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026021042.6581-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
Improve a few comments.  These were extracted from the patch
"fscrypt: add support for hardware-wrapped keys"
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211021181608.54127-4-ebiggers@kernel.org).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026021042.6581-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: allow 256-bit master keys with AES-256-XTS 2021-09-22T18:29:38+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-09-21T03:03:03+00:00 7f595d6a6cdc336834552069a2e0a4f6d4756ddf fscrypt currently requires a 512-bit master key when AES-256-XTS is used, since AES-256-XTS keys are 512-bit and fscrypt requires that the master key be at least as long any key that will be derived from it. However, this is overly strict because AES-256-XTS doesn't actually have a 512-bit security strength, but rather 256-bit. The fact that XTS takes twice the expected key size is a quirk of the XTS mode. It is sufficient to use 256 bits of entropy for AES-256-XTS, provided that it is first properly expanded into a 512-bit key, which HKDF-SHA512 does. Therefore, relax the check of the master key size to use the security strength of the derived key rather than the size of the derived key (except for v1 encryption policies, which don't use HKDF). Besides making things more flexible for userspace, this is needed in order for the use of a KDF which only takes a 256-bit key to be introduced into the fscrypt key hierarchy. This will happen with hardware-wrapped keys support, as all known hardware which supports that feature uses an SP800-108 KDF using AES-256-CMAC, so the wrapped keys are wrapped 256-bit AES keys. Moreover, there is interest in fscrypt supporting the same type of AES-256-CMAC based KDF in software as an alternative to HKDF-SHA512. There is no security problem with such features, so fix the key length check to work properly with them. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210921030303.5598-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
fscrypt currently requires a 512-bit master key when AES-256-XTS is
used, since AES-256-XTS keys are 512-bit and fscrypt requires that the
master key be at least as long any key that will be derived from it.

However, this is overly strict because AES-256-XTS doesn't actually have
a 512-bit security strength, but rather 256-bit.  The fact that XTS
takes twice the expected key size is a quirk of the XTS mode.  It is
sufficient to use 256 bits of entropy for AES-256-XTS, provided that it
is first properly expanded into a 512-bit key, which HKDF-SHA512 does.

Therefore, relax the check of the master key size to use the security
strength of the derived key rather than the size of the derived key
(except for v1 encryption policies, which don't use HKDF).

Besides making things more flexible for userspace, this is needed in
order for the use of a KDF which only takes a 256-bit key to be
introduced into the fscrypt key hierarchy.  This will happen with
hardware-wrapped keys support, as all known hardware which supports that
feature uses an SP800-108 KDF using AES-256-CMAC, so the wrapped keys
are wrapped 256-bit AES keys.  Moreover, there is interest in fscrypt
supporting the same type of AES-256-CMAC based KDF in software as an
alternative to HKDF-SHA512.  There is no security problem with such
features, so fix the key length check to work properly with them.

Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210921030303.5598-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: clean up comments in bio.c 2021-09-21T02:32:34+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-09-09T19:07:37+00:00 f262ca7db7b85cb11517f81d8a6690a9a4be1335 The file comment in bio.c is almost completely irrelevant to the actual contents of the file; it was originally copied from crypto.c. Fix it up, and also add a kerneldoc comment for fscrypt_decrypt_bio(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210909190737.140841-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
The file comment in bio.c is almost completely irrelevant to the actual
contents of the file; it was originally copied from crypto.c.  Fix it
up, and also add a kerneldoc comment for fscrypt_decrypt_bio().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210909190737.140841-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: remove fscrypt_operations::max_namelen 2021-09-21T02:32:33+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-09-09T18:45:13+00:00 4373b3dc922038e8924f648506f6556f2afa7e77 The max_namelen field is unnecessary, as it is set to 255 (NAME_MAX) on all filesystems that support fscrypt (or plan to support fscrypt). For simplicity, just use NAME_MAX directly instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210909184513.139281-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
The max_namelen field is unnecessary, as it is set to 255 (NAME_MAX) on
all filesystems that support fscrypt (or plan to support fscrypt).  For
simplicity, just use NAME_MAX directly instead.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210909184513.139281-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: align Base64 encoding with RFC 4648 base64url 2021-07-26T03:47:05+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-07-18T00:01:25+00:00 ba47b515f59406038a6ad763d4aff1ab50be2038 fscrypt uses a Base64 encoding to encode no-key filenames (the filenames that are presented to userspace when a directory is listed without its encryption key). There are many variants of Base64, but the most common ones are specified by RFC 4648. fscrypt can't use the regular RFC 4648 "base64" variant because "base64" uses the '/' character, which isn't allowed in filenames. However, RFC 4648 also specifies a "base64url" variant for use in URLs and filenames. "base64url" is less common than "base64", but it's still implemented in many programming libraries. Unfortunately, what fscrypt actually uses is a custom Base64 variant that differs from "base64url" in several ways: - The binary data is divided into 6-bit chunks differently. - Values 62 and 63 are encoded with '+' and ',' instead of '-' and '_'. - '='-padding isn't used. This isn't a problem per se, as the padding isn't technically necessary, and RFC 4648 doesn't strictly require it. But it needs to be properly documented. There have been two attempts to copy the fscrypt Base64 code into lib/ (https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200821182813.52570-6-jlayton@kernel.org and https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210716110428.9727-5-hare@suse.de), and both have been caught up by the fscrypt Base64 variant being nonstandard and not properly documented. Also, the planned use of the fscrypt Base64 code in the CephFS storage back-end will prevent it from being changed later (whereas currently it can still be changed), so we need to choose an encoding that we're happy with before it's too late. Therefore, switch the fscrypt Base64 variant to base64url, in order to align more closely with RFC 4648 and other implementations and uses of Base64. However, I opted not to implement '='-padding, as '='-padding adds complexity, is unnecessary, and isn't required by the RFC. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210718000125.59701-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
fscrypt uses a Base64 encoding to encode no-key filenames (the filenames
that are presented to userspace when a directory is listed without its
encryption key).  There are many variants of Base64, but the most common
ones are specified by RFC 4648.  fscrypt can't use the regular RFC 4648
"base64" variant because "base64" uses the '/' character, which isn't
allowed in filenames.  However, RFC 4648 also specifies a "base64url"
variant for use in URLs and filenames.  "base64url" is less common than
"base64", but it's still implemented in many programming libraries.

Unfortunately, what fscrypt actually uses is a custom Base64 variant
that differs from "base64url" in several ways:

- The binary data is divided into 6-bit chunks differently.

- Values 62 and 63 are encoded with '+' and ',' instead of '-' and '_'.

- '='-padding isn't used.  This isn't a problem per se, as the padding
  isn't technically necessary, and RFC 4648 doesn't strictly require it.
  But it needs to be properly documented.

There have been two attempts to copy the fscrypt Base64 code into lib/
(https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200821182813.52570-6-jlayton@kernel.org and
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210716110428.9727-5-hare@suse.de), and both
have been caught up by the fscrypt Base64 variant being nonstandard and
not properly documented.  Also, the planned use of the fscrypt Base64
code in the CephFS storage back-end will prevent it from being changed
later (whereas currently it can still be changed), so we need to choose
an encoding that we're happy with before it's too late.

Therefore, switch the fscrypt Base64 variant to base64url, in order to
align more closely with RFC 4648 and other implementations and uses of
Base64.  However, I opted not to implement '='-padding, as '='-padding
adds complexity, is unnecessary, and isn't required by the RFC.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210718000125.59701-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: add fscrypt_symlink_getattr() for computing st_size 2021-07-26T03:01:06+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-07-02T06:53:46+00:00 d18760560593e5af921f51a8c9b64b6109d634c2 Add a helper function fscrypt_symlink_getattr() which will be called from the various filesystems' ->getattr() methods to read and decrypt the target of encrypted symlinks in order to report the correct st_size. Detailed explanation: As required by POSIX and as documented in various man pages, st_size for a symlink is supposed to be the length of the symlink target. Unfortunately, st_size has always been wrong for encrypted symlinks because st_size is populated from i_size from disk, which intentionally contains the length of the encrypted symlink target. That's slightly greater than the length of the decrypted symlink target (which is the symlink target that userspace usually sees), and usually won't match the length of the no-key encoded symlink target either. This hadn't been fixed yet because reporting the correct st_size would require reading the symlink target from disk and decrypting or encoding it, which historically has been considered too heavyweight to do in ->getattr(). Also historically, the wrong st_size had only broken a test (LTP lstat03) and there were no known complaints from real users. (This is probably because the st_size of symlinks isn't used too often, and when it is, typically it's for a hint for what buffer size to pass to readlink() -- which a slightly-too-large size still works for.) However, a couple things have changed now. First, there have recently been complaints about the current behavior from real users: - Breakage in rpmbuild: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1682 https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/305 - Breakage in toybox cpio: https://www.mail-archive.com/toybox@lists.landley.net/msg07193.html - Breakage in libgit2: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/189629152 (on Android public issue tracker, requires login) Second, we now cache decrypted symlink targets in ->i_link. Therefore, taking the performance hit of reading and decrypting the symlink target in ->getattr() wouldn't be as big a deal as it used to be, since usually it will just save having to do the same thing later. Also note that eCryptfs ended up having to read and decrypt symlink targets in ->getattr() as well, to fix this same issue; see commit 3a60a1686f0d ("eCryptfs: Decrypt symlink target for stat size"). So, let's just bite the bullet, and read and decrypt the symlink target in ->getattr() in order to report the correct st_size. Add a function fscrypt_symlink_getattr() which the filesystems will call to do this. (Alternatively, we could store the decrypted size of symlinks on-disk. But there isn't a great place to do so, and encryption is meant to hide the original size to some extent; that property would be lost.) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210702065350.209646-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
Add a helper function fscrypt_symlink_getattr() which will be called
from the various filesystems' ->getattr() methods to read and decrypt
the target of encrypted symlinks in order to report the correct st_size.

Detailed explanation:

As required by POSIX and as documented in various man pages, st_size for
a symlink is supposed to be the length of the symlink target.
Unfortunately, st_size has always been wrong for encrypted symlinks
because st_size is populated from i_size from disk, which intentionally
contains the length of the encrypted symlink target.  That's slightly
greater than the length of the decrypted symlink target (which is the
symlink target that userspace usually sees), and usually won't match the
length of the no-key encoded symlink target either.

This hadn't been fixed yet because reporting the correct st_size would
require reading the symlink target from disk and decrypting or encoding
it, which historically has been considered too heavyweight to do in
->getattr().  Also historically, the wrong st_size had only broken a
test (LTP lstat03) and there were no known complaints from real users.
(This is probably because the st_size of symlinks isn't used too often,
and when it is, typically it's for a hint for what buffer size to pass
to readlink() -- which a slightly-too-large size still works for.)

However, a couple things have changed now.  First, there have recently
been complaints about the current behavior from real users:

- Breakage in rpmbuild:
  https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1682
  https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/305

- Breakage in toybox cpio:
  https://www.mail-archive.com/toybox@lists.landley.net/msg07193.html

- Breakage in libgit2: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/189629152
  (on Android public issue tracker, requires login)

Second, we now cache decrypted symlink targets in ->i_link.  Therefore,
taking the performance hit of reading and decrypting the symlink target
in ->getattr() wouldn't be as big a deal as it used to be, since usually
it will just save having to do the same thing later.

Also note that eCryptfs ended up having to read and decrypt symlink
targets in ->getattr() as well, to fix this same issue; see
commit 3a60a1686f0d ("eCryptfs: Decrypt symlink target for stat size").

So, let's just bite the bullet, and read and decrypt the symlink target
in ->getattr() in order to report the correct st_size.  Add a function
fscrypt_symlink_getattr() which the filesystems will call to do this.

(Alternatively, we could store the decrypted size of symlinks on-disk.
But there isn't a great place to do so, and encryption is meant to hide
the original size to some extent; that property would be lost.)

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210702065350.209646-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: fix derivation of SipHash keys on big endian CPUs 2021-06-05T07:52:52+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-06-05T07:50:33+00:00 2fc2b430f559fdf32d5d1dd5ceaa40e12fb77bdf Typically, the cryptographic APIs that fscrypt uses take keys as byte arrays, which avoids endianness issues. However, siphash_key_t is an exception. It is defined as 'u64 key[2];', i.e. the 128-bit key is expected to be given directly as two 64-bit words in CPU endianness. fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key() and fscrypt_setup_iv_ino_lblk_32_key() forgot to take this into account. Therefore, the SipHash keys used to index encrypted+casefolded directories differ on big endian vs. little endian platforms, as do the SipHash keys used to hash inode numbers for IV_INO_LBLK_32-encrypted directories. This makes such directories non-portable between these platforms. Fix this by always using the little endian order. This is a breaking change for big endian platforms, but this should be fine in practice since these features (encrypt+casefold support, and the IV_INO_LBLK_32 flag) aren't known to actually be used on any big endian platforms yet. Fixes: aa408f835d02 ("fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories") Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210605075033.54424-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
Typically, the cryptographic APIs that fscrypt uses take keys as byte
arrays, which avoids endianness issues.  However, siphash_key_t is an
exception.  It is defined as 'u64 key[2];', i.e. the 128-bit key is
expected to be given directly as two 64-bit words in CPU endianness.

fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key() and fscrypt_setup_iv_ino_lblk_32_key()
forgot to take this into account.  Therefore, the SipHash keys used to
index encrypted+casefolded directories differ on big endian vs. little
endian platforms, as do the SipHash keys used to hash inode numbers for
IV_INO_LBLK_32-encrypted directories.  This makes such directories
non-portable between these platforms.

Fix this by always using the little endian order.  This is a breaking
change for big endian platforms, but this should be fine in practice
since these features (encrypt+casefold support, and the IV_INO_LBLK_32
flag) aren't known to actually be used on any big endian platforms yet.

Fixes: aa408f835d02 ("fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories")
Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210605075033.54424-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt: don't ignore minor_hash when hash is 0 2021-06-05T07:22:53+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2021-05-27T23:52:36+00:00 77f30bfcfcf484da7208affd6a9e63406420bf91 When initializing a no-key name, fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() sets the minor_hash to 0 if the (major) hash is 0. This doesn't make sense because 0 is a valid hash code, so we shouldn't ignore the filesystem-provided minor_hash in that case. Fix this by removing the special case for 'hash == 0'. This is an old bug that appears to have originated when the encryption code in ext4 and f2fs was moved into fs/crypto/. The original ext4 and f2fs code passed the hash by pointer instead of by value. So 'if (hash)' actually made sense then, as it was checking whether a pointer was NULL. But now the hashes are passed by value, and filesystems just pass 0 for any hashes they don't have. There is no need to handle this any differently from the hashes actually being 0. It is difficult to reproduce this bug, as it only made a difference in the case where a filename's 32-bit major hash happened to be 0. However, it probably had the largest chance of causing problems on ubifs, since ubifs uses minor_hash to do lookups of no-key names, in addition to using it as a readdir cookie. ext4 only uses minor_hash as a readdir cookie, and f2fs doesn't use minor_hash at all. Fixes: 0b81d0779072 ("fs crypto: move per-file encryption from f2fs tree to fs/crypto") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527235236.2376556-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> 
When initializing a no-key name, fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() sets the
minor_hash to 0 if the (major) hash is 0.

This doesn't make sense because 0 is a valid hash code, so we shouldn't
ignore the filesystem-provided minor_hash in that case.  Fix this by
removing the special case for 'hash == 0'.

This is an old bug that appears to have originated when the encryption
code in ext4 and f2fs was moved into fs/crypto/.  The original ext4 and
f2fs code passed the hash by pointer instead of by value.  So
'if (hash)' actually made sense then, as it was checking whether a
pointer was NULL.  But now the hashes are passed by value, and
filesystems just pass 0 for any hashes they don't have.  There is no
need to handle this any differently from the hashes actually being 0.

It is difficult to reproduce this bug, as it only made a difference in
the case where a filename's 32-bit major hash happened to be 0.
However, it probably had the largest chance of causing problems on
ubifs, since ubifs uses minor_hash to do lookups of no-key names, in
addition to using it as a readdir cookie.  ext4 only uses minor_hash as
a readdir cookie, and f2fs doesn't use minor_hash at all.

Fixes: 0b81d0779072 ("fs crypto: move per-file encryption from f2fs tree to fs/crypto")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527235236.2376556-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6 2021-04-26T15:51:23+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2021-04-26T15:51:23+00:00 a4a78bc8ead44c3cdb470c6e1f37afcabdddfc14 Pull crypto updates from Herbert Xu: "API: - crypto_destroy_tfm now ignores errors as well as NULL pointers Algorithms: - Add explicit curve IDs in ECDH algorithm names - Add NIST P384 curve parameters - Add ECDSA Drivers: - Add support for Green Sardine in ccp - Add ecdh/curve25519 to hisilicon/hpre - Add support for AM64 in sa2ul" * 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6: (184 commits) fsverity: relax build time dependency on CRYPTO_SHA256 fscrypt: relax Kconfig dependencies for crypto API algorithms crypto: camellia - drop duplicate "depends on CRYPTO" crypto: s5p-sss - consistently use local 'dev' variable in probe() crypto: s5p-sss - remove unneeded local variable initialization crypto: s5p-sss - simplify getting of_device_id match data ccp: ccp - add support for Green Sardine crypto: ccp - Make ccp_dev_suspend and ccp_dev_resume void functions crypto: octeontx2 - add support for OcteonTX2 98xx CPT block. crypto: chelsio/chcr - Remove useless MODULE_VERSION crypto: ux500/cryp - Remove duplicate argument crypto: chelsio - remove unused function crypto: sa2ul - Add support for AM64 crypto: sa2ul - Support for per channel coherency dt-bindings: crypto: ti,sa2ul: Add new compatible for AM64 crypto: hisilicon - enable new error types for QM crypto: hisilicon - add new error type for SEC crypto: hisilicon - support new error types for ZIP crypto: hisilicon - dynamic configuration 'err_info' crypto: doc - fix kernel-doc notation in chacha.c and af_alg.c ... 
Pull crypto updates from Herbert Xu:
 "API:

   - crypto_destroy_tfm now ignores errors as well as NULL pointers

  Algorithms:

   - Add explicit curve IDs in ECDH algorithm names

   - Add NIST P384 curve parameters

   - Add ECDSA

  Drivers:

   - Add support for Green Sardine in ccp

   - Add ecdh/curve25519 to hisilicon/hpre

   - Add support for AM64 in sa2ul"

* 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6: (184 commits)
  fsverity: relax build time dependency on CRYPTO_SHA256
  fscrypt: relax Kconfig dependencies for crypto API algorithms
  crypto: camellia - drop duplicate "depends on CRYPTO"
  crypto: s5p-sss - consistently use local 'dev' variable in probe()
  crypto: s5p-sss - remove unneeded local variable initialization
  crypto: s5p-sss - simplify getting of_device_id match data
  ccp: ccp - add support for Green Sardine
  crypto: ccp - Make ccp_dev_suspend and ccp_dev_resume void functions
  crypto: octeontx2 - add support for OcteonTX2 98xx CPT block.
  crypto: chelsio/chcr - Remove useless MODULE_VERSION
  crypto: ux500/cryp - Remove duplicate argument
  crypto: chelsio - remove unused function
  crypto: sa2ul - Add support for AM64
  crypto: sa2ul - Support for per channel coherency
  dt-bindings: crypto: ti,sa2ul: Add new compatible for AM64
  crypto: hisilicon - enable new error types for QM
  crypto: hisilicon - add new error type for SEC
  crypto: hisilicon - support new error types for ZIP
  crypto: hisilicon - dynamic configuration 'err_info'
  crypto: doc - fix kernel-doc notation in chacha.c and af_alg.c
  ...
fscrypt: relax Kconfig dependencies for crypto API algorithms 2021-04-22T07:31:32+00:00 Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org 2021-04-21T07:55:10+00:00 a0fc20333ee4bac1147c4cf75dea098c26671a2f Even if FS encryption has strict functional dependencies on various crypto algorithms and chaining modes. those dependencies could potentially be satisified by other implementations than the generic ones, and no link time dependency exists on the 'depends on' claused defined by CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS. So let's relax these clauses to 'imply', so that the default behavior is still to pull in those generic algorithms, but in a way that permits them to be disabled again in Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> 
Even if FS encryption has strict functional dependencies on various
crypto algorithms and chaining modes. those dependencies could potentially
be satisified by other implementations than the generic ones, and no link
time dependency exists on the 'depends on' claused defined by
CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS.

So let's relax these clauses to 'imply', so that the default behavior
is still to pull in those generic algorithms, but in a way that permits
them to be disabled again in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>