The EXT_STATS macro in fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h has been defined
but never used in the codebase since its introduction. This patch
removes it.

Analysis:
1. No references found in fs/ext4/ or other kernel code.
2. No impact on compilation or functionality.
3. Git history shows it was never utilized.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250527053805.1550912-1-liubaolin12138@163.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Add sparse annotations to suppress false positive context imbalance
warnings, and use NULL instead of 0 in EXT_MAX_{EXTENT,INDEX}.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

If eh->eh_max is 0, EXT_MAX_EXTENT/INDEX would evaluate to unsigned
(-1) resulting in illegal memory accesses. Although there is no
consistent repro, we see that generic/019 sometimes crashes because of
this bug.

Ran gce-xfstests smoke and verified that there were no regressions.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421023959.20879-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

Make the following functions static since they're only used in
extents.c:

	__ext4_ext_dirty()
	ext4_can_extents_be_merged()
	ext4_collapse_range()
	ext4_insert_range()

Also remove the prototype for ext4_ext_writepage_trans_blocks(), as this
function is not defined anywhere.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191231180444.46586-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Modify ext4_ext_remove_space() and the code it calls to correct the
reserved cluster count for pending reservations (delayed allocated
clusters shared with allocated blocks) when a block range is removed
from the extent tree.  Pending reservations may be found for the clusters
at the ends of written or unwritten extents when a block range is removed.
If a physical cluster at the end of an extent is freed, it's necessary
to increment the reserved cluster count to maintain correct accounting
if the corresponding logical cluster is shared with at least one
delayed and unwritten extent as found in the extents status tree.

Add a new function, ext4_rereserve_cluster(), to reapply a reservation
on a delayed allocated cluster sharing blocks with a freed allocated
cluster.  To avoid ENOSPC on reservation, a flag is applied to
ext4_free_blocks() to briefly defer updating the freeclusters counter
when an allocated cluster is freed.  This prevents another thread
from allocating the freed block before the reservation can be reapplied.

Redefine the partial cluster object as a struct to carry more state
information and to clarify the code using it.

Adjust the conditional code structure in ext4_ext_remove_space to
reduce the indentation level in the main body of the code to improve
readability.

Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

If there is a corupted file system where the claimed depth of the
extent tree is -1, this can cause a massive buffer overrun leading to
sadness.

This addresses CVE-2018-10877.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199417

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

A number of ext4 source files were skipped due because their copyright
permission statements didn't match the expected text used by the
automated conversion utilities.  I've added SPDX tags for the rest.

While looking at some of these files, I've noticed that we have quite
a bit of variation on the licenses that were used --- in particular
some of the Red Hat licenses on the jbd2 files use a GPL2+ license,
and we have some files that have a LGPL-2.1 license (which was quite
surprising).

I've not attempted to do any license changes.  Even if it is perfectly
legal to relicense to GPL 2.0-only for consistency's sake, that should
be done with ext4 developer community discussion.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

This adds additional safety in case for some reason we end reusing a
path structure which isn't big enough for current depth of the inode.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently in ext4 there is quite a mess when it comes to naming
unwritten extents. Sometimes we call it uninitialized and sometimes we
refer to it as unwritten.

The right name for the extent which has been allocated but does not
contain any written data is _unwritten_. Other file systems are
using this name consistently, even the buffer head state refers to it as
unwritten. We need to fix this confusion in ext4.

This commit changes every reference to an uninitialized extent (meaning
allocated but unwritten) to unwritten extent. This includes comments,
function names and variable names. It even covers abbreviation of the
word uninitialized (such as uninit) and some misspellings.

This commit does not change any of the code paths at all. This has been
confirmed by comparing md5sums of the assembly code of each object file
after all the function names were stripped from it.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>