<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-toradex.git/fs/ext4/extents.c, branch v3.0.44</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>ext4: fix endianness breakage in ext4_split_extent_at()</title>
<updated>2012-04-27T16:51:09+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-04-13T00:32:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=4c88a16263381c429ae0ebdc213e3d1ba5710a75'/>
<id>4c88a16263381c429ae0ebdc213e3d1ba5710a75</id>
<content type='text'>
commit af1584f570b19b0285e4402a0b54731495d31784 upstream.

-&gt;ee_len is __le16, so assigning cpu_to_le32() to it is going to do
Bad Things(tm) on big-endian hosts...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
Cc: Ted Ts'o &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit af1584f570b19b0285e4402a0b54731495d31784 upstream.

-&gt;ee_len is __le16, so assigning cpu_to_le32() to it is going to do
Bad Things(tm) on big-endian hosts...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
Cc: Ted Ts'o &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: check for zero length extent</title>
<updated>2012-04-02T16:27:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Theodore Ts'o</name>
<email>tytso@mit.edu</email>
</author>
<published>2012-03-12T03:30:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=471320c7569290aeed04f9c730d92b67b9acb53d'/>
<id>471320c7569290aeed04f9c730d92b67b9acb53d</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 31d4f3a2f3c73f279ff96a7135d7202ef6833f12 upstream.

Explicitly test for an extent whose length is zero, and flag that as a
corrupted extent.

This avoids a kernel BUG_ON assertion failure.

Tested: Without this patch, the file system image found in
tests/f_ext_zero_len/image.gz in the latest e2fsprogs sources causes a
kernel panic.  With this patch, an ext4 file system error is noted
instead, and the file system is marked as being corrupted.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 31d4f3a2f3c73f279ff96a7135d7202ef6833f12 upstream.

Explicitly test for an extent whose length is zero, and flag that as a
corrupted extent.

This avoids a kernel BUG_ON assertion failure.

Tested: Without this patch, the file system image found in
tests/f_ext_zero_len/image.gz in the latest e2fsprogs sources causes a
kernel panic.  With this patch, an ext4 file system error is noted
instead, and the file system is marked as being corrupted.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: free allocated and pre-allocated blocks when check_eofblocks_fl fails</title>
<updated>2011-08-05T04:58:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jiaying Zhang</name>
<email>jiayingz@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-07-11T00:07:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=fac04f94c7b94ef1c62490b176b77f2572086629'/>
<id>fac04f94c7b94ef1c62490b176b77f2572086629</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 575a1d4bdfa2ea9fc10733013136145b497e1be0 upstream.

Upon corrupted inode or disk failures, we may fail after we already
allocate some blocks from the inode or take some blocks from the
inode's preallocation list, but before we successfully insert the
corresponding extent to the extent tree. In this case, we should free
any allocated blocks and discard the inode's preallocated blocks
because the entries in the inode's preallocation list may be in an
inconsistent state.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang &lt;jiayingz@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@suse.de&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 575a1d4bdfa2ea9fc10733013136145b497e1be0 upstream.

Upon corrupted inode or disk failures, we may fail after we already
allocate some blocks from the inode or take some blocks from the
inode's preallocation list, but before we successfully insert the
corresponding extent to the extent tree. In this case, we should free
any allocated blocks and discard the inode's preallocated blocks
because the entries in the inode's preallocation list may be in an
inconsistent state.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang &lt;jiayingz@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@suse.de&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: fix i_blocks/quota accounting when extent insertion fails</title>
<updated>2011-08-05T04:58:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Maxim Patlasov</name>
<email>maxim.patlasov@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-07-10T23:37:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=99cdf2a47f443985d956e02323331819898d99b7'/>
<id>99cdf2a47f443985d956e02323331819898d99b7</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 7132de744ba76930d13033061018ddd7e3e8cd91 upstream.

The current implementation of ext4_free_blocks() always calls
dquot_free_block This looks quite sensible in the most cases: blocks
to be freed are associated with inode and were accounted in quota and
i_blocks some time ago.

However, there is a case when blocks to free were not accounted by the
time calling ext4_free_blocks() yet:

1. delalloc is on, write_begin pre-allocated some space in quota
2. write-back happens, ext4 allocates some blocks in ext4_ext_map_blocks()
3. then ext4_ext_map_blocks() gets an error (e.g.  ENOSPC) from
   ext4_ext_insert_extent() and calls ext4_free_blocks().

In this scenario, ext4_free_blocks() calls dquot_free_block() who, in
turn, decrements i_blocks for blocks which were not accounted yet (due
to delalloc) After clean umount, e2fsck reports something like:

&gt; Inode 21, i_blocks is 5080, should be 5128.  Fix&lt;y&gt;?
because i_blocks was erroneously decremented as explained above.

The patch fixes the problem by passing the new flag
EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NO_QUOT_UPDATE to ext4_free_blocks(), to request
that the dquot_free_block() call be skipped.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov &lt;maxim.patlasov@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@suse.de&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 7132de744ba76930d13033061018ddd7e3e8cd91 upstream.

The current implementation of ext4_free_blocks() always calls
dquot_free_block This looks quite sensible in the most cases: blocks
to be freed are associated with inode and were accounted in quota and
i_blocks some time ago.

However, there is a case when blocks to free were not accounted by the
time calling ext4_free_blocks() yet:

1. delalloc is on, write_begin pre-allocated some space in quota
2. write-back happens, ext4 allocates some blocks in ext4_ext_map_blocks()
3. then ext4_ext_map_blocks() gets an error (e.g.  ENOSPC) from
   ext4_ext_insert_extent() and calls ext4_free_blocks().

In this scenario, ext4_free_blocks() calls dquot_free_block() who, in
turn, decrements i_blocks for blocks which were not accounted yet (due
to delalloc) After clean umount, e2fsck reports something like:

&gt; Inode 21, i_blocks is 5080, should be 5128.  Fix&lt;y&gt;?
because i_blocks was erroneously decremented as explained above.

The patch fixes the problem by passing the new flag
EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NO_QUOT_UPDATE to ext4_free_blocks(), to request
that the dquot_free_block() call be skipped.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov &lt;maxim.patlasov@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@suse.de&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: use FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST flag for last extent in fiemap </title>
<updated>2011-06-06T04:06:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Lukas Czerner</name>
<email>lczerner@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-06-06T04:06:52+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=c03f8aa9abdd517477c2021ea1251939b4da49e6'/>
<id>c03f8aa9abdd517477c2021ea1251939b4da49e6</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently we are not marking the extent as the last one
(FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) if there is a hole at the end of the file. This is
because we just do not check for it right now and continue searching for
next extent. But at the point we hit the hole at the end of the file, it
is too late.

This commit adds check for the allocated block in subsequent extent and
if there is no more extents (block = EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) just flag the
current one as the last one.

This behaviour has been spotted unintentionally by 252 xfstest, when the
test hangs out, because of wrong loop condition. However on other
filesystems (like xfs) it will exit anyway, because we notice the last
extent flag and exit.

With this patch xfstest 252 does not hang anymore, ext4 fiemap
implementation still reports bad extent type in some cases, however
this seems to be different issue.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner &lt;lczerner@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently we are not marking the extent as the last one
(FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) if there is a hole at the end of the file. This is
because we just do not check for it right now and continue searching for
next extent. But at the point we hit the hole at the end of the file, it
is too late.

This commit adds check for the allocated block in subsequent extent and
if there is no more extents (block = EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) just flag the
current one as the last one.

This behaviour has been spotted unintentionally by 252 xfstest, when the
test hangs out, because of wrong loop condition. However on other
filesystems (like xfs) it will exit anyway, because we notice the last
extent flag and exit.

With this patch xfstest 252 does not hang anymore, ext4 fiemap
implementation still reports bad extent type in some cases, however
this seems to be different issue.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner &lt;lczerner@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: Fix max file size and logical block counting of extent format file</title>
<updated>2011-06-06T04:05:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Lukas Czerner</name>
<email>lczerner@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-06-06T04:05:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=f17722f917b2f21497deb6edc62fb1683daa08e6'/>
<id>f17722f917b2f21497deb6edc62fb1683daa08e6</id>
<content type='text'>
Kazuya Mio reported that he was able to hit BUG_ON(next == lblock)
in ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache() while creating a sparse file in extent
format and fill the tail of file up to its end. We will hit the BUG_ON
when we write the last block (2^32-1) into the sparse file.

The root cause of the problem lies in the fact that we specifically set
s_maxbytes so that block at s_maxbytes fit into on-disk extent format,
which is 32 bit long. However, we are not storing start and end block
number, but rather start block number and length in blocks. It means
that in order to cover extent from 0 to EXT_MAX_BLOCK we need
EXT_MAX_BLOCK+1 to fit into len (because we counting block 0 as well) -
and it does not.

The only way to fix it without changing the meaning of the struct
ext4_extent members is, as Kazuya Mio suggested, to lower s_maxbytes
by one fs block so we can cover the whole extent we can get by the
on-disk extent format.

Also in many places EXT_MAX_BLOCK is used as length instead of maximum
logical block number as the name suggests, it is all a bit messy. So
this commit renames it to EXT_MAX_BLOCKS and change its usage in some
places to actually be maximum number of blocks in the extent.

The bug which this commit fixes can be reproduced as follows:

 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/mp1/file bs=&lt;blocksize&gt; count=1 seek=$((2**32-2))
 sync
 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/mp1/file bs=&lt;blocksize&gt; count=1 seek=$((2**32-1))

Reported-by: Kazuya Mio &lt;k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner &lt;lczerner@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Kazuya Mio reported that he was able to hit BUG_ON(next == lblock)
in ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache() while creating a sparse file in extent
format and fill the tail of file up to its end. We will hit the BUG_ON
when we write the last block (2^32-1) into the sparse file.

The root cause of the problem lies in the fact that we specifically set
s_maxbytes so that block at s_maxbytes fit into on-disk extent format,
which is 32 bit long. However, we are not storing start and end block
number, but rather start block number and length in blocks. It means
that in order to cover extent from 0 to EXT_MAX_BLOCK we need
EXT_MAX_BLOCK+1 to fit into len (because we counting block 0 as well) -
and it does not.

The only way to fix it without changing the meaning of the struct
ext4_extent members is, as Kazuya Mio suggested, to lower s_maxbytes
by one fs block so we can cover the whole extent we can get by the
on-disk extent format.

Also in many places EXT_MAX_BLOCK is used as length instead of maximum
logical block number as the name suggests, it is all a bit messy. So
this commit renames it to EXT_MAX_BLOCKS and change its usage in some
places to actually be maximum number of blocks in the extent.

The bug which this commit fixes can be reproduced as follows:

 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/mp1/file bs=&lt;blocksize&gt; count=1 seek=$((2**32-2))
 sync
 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/mp1/file bs=&lt;blocksize&gt; count=1 seek=$((2**32-1))

Reported-by: Kazuya Mio &lt;k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner &lt;lczerner@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: teach ext4_ext_split to calculate extents efficiently</title>
<updated>2011-05-25T21:41:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yongqiang Yang</name>
<email>xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-05-25T21:41:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=1b16da77f90328661fc7e556ad591f9ee6b7ef6a'/>
<id>1b16da77f90328661fc7e556ad591f9ee6b7ef6a</id>
<content type='text'>
Make ext4_ext_split() get extents to be moved by calculating in a statement
instead of counting in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang &lt;xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Make ext4_ext_split() get extents to be moved by calculating in a statement
instead of counting in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang &lt;xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: do not normalize block requests from fallocate()</title>
<updated>2011-05-25T11:41:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Vivek Haldar</name>
<email>haldar@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-05-25T11:41:54+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=556b27abf73833923d5cd4be80006292e1b31662'/>
<id>556b27abf73833923d5cd4be80006292e1b31662</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, an fallocate request of size slightly larger than a power of
2 is turned into two block requests, each a power of 2, with the extra
blocks pre-allocated for future use. When an application calls
fallocate, it already has an idea about how large the file may grow so
there is usually little benefit to reserve extra blocks on the
preallocation list. This reduces disk fragmentation.

Tested: fsstress. Also verified manually that fallocat'ed files are
contiguously laid out with this change (whereas without it they begin at
power-of-2 boundaries, leaving blocks in between). CPU usage of
fallocate is not appreciably higher.  In a tight fallocate loop, CPU
usage hovers between 5%-8% with this change, and 5%-7% without it.

Using a simulated file system aging program which the file system to
70%, the percentage of free extents larger than 8MB (as measured by
e2freefrag) increased from 38.8% without this change, to 69.4% with
this change.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Haldar &lt;haldar@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently, an fallocate request of size slightly larger than a power of
2 is turned into two block requests, each a power of 2, with the extra
blocks pre-allocated for future use. When an application calls
fallocate, it already has an idea about how large the file may grow so
there is usually little benefit to reserve extra blocks on the
preallocation list. This reduces disk fragmentation.

Tested: fsstress. Also verified manually that fallocat'ed files are
contiguously laid out with this change (whereas without it they begin at
power-of-2 boundaries, leaving blocks in between). CPU usage of
fallocate is not appreciably higher.  In a tight fallocate loop, CPU
usage hovers between 5%-8% with this change, and 5%-7% without it.

Using a simulated file system aging program which the file system to
70%, the percentage of free extents larger than 8MB (as measured by
e2freefrag) increased from 38.8% without this change, to 69.4% with
this change.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Haldar &lt;haldar@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: enable "punch hole" functionality</title>
<updated>2011-05-25T11:41:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Allison Henderson</name>
<email>achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-05-25T11:41:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=a4bb6b64e39abc0e41ca077725f2a72c868e7622'/>
<id>a4bb6b64e39abc0e41ca077725f2a72c868e7622</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch adds new routines: "ext4_punch_hole" "ext4_ext_punch_hole"
and "ext4_ext_check_cache"

fallocate has been modified to call ext4_punch_hole when the punch hole
flag is passed.  At the moment, we only support punching holes in
extents, so this routine is pretty much a wrapper for the ext4_ext_punch_hole
routine.

The ext4_ext_punch_hole routine first completes all outstanding writes
with the associated pages, and then releases them.  The unblock
aligned data is zeroed, and all blocks in between are punched out.

The ext4_ext_check_cache routine is very similar to ext4_ext_in_cache
except it accepts a ext4_ext_cache parameter instead of a ext4_extent
parameter.  This routine is used by ext4_ext_punch_hole to check and
see if a block in a hole that has been cached.  The ext4_ext_cache
parameter is necessary because the members ext4_extent structure are
not large enough to hold a 32 bit value.  The existing
ext4_ext_in_cache routine has become a wrapper to this new function.

[ext4 punch hole patch series 5/5 v7] 

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson &lt;achender@us.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao &lt;cmm@us.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch adds new routines: "ext4_punch_hole" "ext4_ext_punch_hole"
and "ext4_ext_check_cache"

fallocate has been modified to call ext4_punch_hole when the punch hole
flag is passed.  At the moment, we only support punching holes in
extents, so this routine is pretty much a wrapper for the ext4_ext_punch_hole
routine.

The ext4_ext_punch_hole routine first completes all outstanding writes
with the associated pages, and then releases them.  The unblock
aligned data is zeroed, and all blocks in between are punched out.

The ext4_ext_check_cache routine is very similar to ext4_ext_in_cache
except it accepts a ext4_ext_cache parameter instead of a ext4_extent
parameter.  This routine is used by ext4_ext_punch_hole to check and
see if a block in a hole that has been cached.  The ext4_ext_cache
parameter is necessary because the members ext4_extent structure are
not large enough to hold a 32 bit value.  The existing
ext4_ext_in_cache routine has become a wrapper to this new function.

[ext4 punch hole patch series 5/5 v7] 

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson &lt;achender@us.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao &lt;cmm@us.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ext4: add "punch hole" flag to ext4_map_blocks()</title>
<updated>2011-05-25T11:41:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Allison Henderson</name>
<email>achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-05-25T11:41:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=e861304b8ed83fe43e36d46794d72641c82d4636'/>
<id>e861304b8ed83fe43e36d46794d72641c82d4636</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch adds a new flag to ext4_map_blocks() that specifies the
given range of blocks should be punched out.  Extents are first
converted to uninitialized extents before they are punched
out. Because punching a hole may require that the extent be split, it
is possible that the splitting may need more blocks than are
available.  To deal with this, use of reserved blocks are enabled to
allow the split to proceed.

The routine then returns the number of blocks successfully
punched out.

[ext4 punch hole patch series 4/5 v7]

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson &lt;achender@us.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao &lt;cmm@us.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch adds a new flag to ext4_map_blocks() that specifies the
given range of blocks should be punched out.  Extents are first
converted to uninitialized extents before they are punched
out. Because punching a hole may require that the extent be split, it
is possible that the splitting may need more blocks than are
available.  To deal with this, use of reserved blocks are enabled to
allow the split to proceed.

The routine then returns the number of blocks successfully
punched out.

[ext4 punch hole patch series 4/5 v7]

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson &lt;achender@us.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" &lt;tytso@mit.edu&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao &lt;cmm@us.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
