linux-toradex.git/fs/ext4/inode.c, branch v3.0.44

ext4: don't let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-08-09T15:27:51+00:00

commit 97795d2a5b8d3c8dc4365d4bd3404191840453ba upstream.

If we hit a condition where we have allocated metadata blocks that
were not appropriately reserved, we risk underflow of
ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks.  In turn, this can throw
sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter significantly out of whack and undermine
the nondelalloc fallback logic in ext4_nonda_switch().  Warn if this
occurs and set i_allocated_meta_blocks to avoid this problem.

This condition is reproduced by xfstests 270 against ext2 with
delalloc enabled:

Mar 28 08:58:02 localhost kernel: [  171.526344] EXT4-fs (loop1): delayed block allocation failed for inode 14 at logical offset 64486 with max blocks 64 with error -28
Mar 28 08:58:02 localhost kernel: [  171.526346] EXT4-fs (loop1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

270 ultimately fails with an inconsistent filesystem and requires an
fsck to repair.  The cause of the error is an underflow in
ext4_da_update_reserve_space() due to an unreserved meta block
allocation.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: ignore EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA flag with delalloc

2012-04-02T16:27:19+00:00

commit 3d2b158262826e8b75bbbfb7b97010838dd92ac7 upstream.

Ext4 does not support data journalling with delayed allocation enabled.
We even do not allow to mount the file system with delayed allocation
and data journalling enabled, however it can be set via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS
so we can hit the inode with EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA set even on file
system mounted with delayed allocation (default) and that's where
problem arises. The easies way to reproduce this problem is with the
following set of commands:

 mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdd
 mount /dev/sdd /mnt/test1
 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test1/file bs=1M count=4
 chattr +j /mnt/test1/file
 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test1/file bs=1M count=4 conv=notrunc
 chattr -j /mnt/test1/file

Additionally it can be reproduced quite reliably with xfstests 272 and
269. In fact the above reproducer is a part of test 272.

To fix this we should ignore the EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA inode flag if
the file system is mounted with delayed allocation. This can be easily
done by fixing ext4_should_*_data() functions do ignore data journal
flag when delalloc is set (suggested by Ted). We also have to set the
appropriate address space operations for the inode (again, ignoring data
journal flag if delalloc enabled).

Additionally this commit introduces ext4_inode_journal_mode() function
because ext4_should_*_data() has already had a lot of common code and
this change is putting it all into one function so it is easier to
read.

Successfully tested with xfstests in following configurations:

delalloc + data=ordered
delalloc + data=writeback
data=journal
nodelalloc + data=ordered
nodelalloc + data=writeback
nodelalloc + data=journal

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO reads w/dioread_nolock

2012-04-02T16:27:18+00:00

commit dccaf33fa37a1bc5d651baeb3bfeb6becb86597b upstream.

(backported to 3.0 by mjt)

There is a race between ext4 buffer write and direct_IO read with
dioread_nolock mount option enabled. The problem is that we clear
PageWriteback flag during end_io time but will do
uninitialized-to-initialized extent conversion later with dioread_nolock.
If an O_direct read request comes in during this period, ext4 will return
zero instead of the recently written data.

This patch checks whether there are any pending uninitialized-to-initialized
extent conversion requests before doing O_direct read to close the race.
Note that this is just a bandaid fix. The fundamental issue is that we
clear PageWriteback flag before we really complete an IO, which is
problem-prone. To fix the fundamental issue, we may need to implement an
extent tree cache that we can use to look up pending to-be-converted extents.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: avoid potential hang in mpage_submit_io() when blocksize < pagesize

2011-12-21T20:57:44+00:00

commit 13a79a4741d37fda2fbafb953f0f301dc007928f upstream.

If there is an unwritten but clean buffer in a page and there is a
dirty buffer after the buffer, then mpage_submit_io does not write the
dirty buffer out.  As a result, da_writepages loops forever.

This patch fixes the problem by checking dirty flag.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: avoid hangs in ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize()

2011-12-21T20:57:44+00:00

commit ea51d132dbf9b00063169c1159bee253d9649224 upstream.

If the pte mapping in generic_perform_write() is unmapped between
iov_iter_fault_in_readable() and iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(), the
"copied" parameter to ->end_write can be zero. ext4 couldn't cope with
it with delayed allocations enabled. This skips the i_disksize
enlargement logic if copied is zero and no new data was appeneded to
the inode.

 gdb> bt
 #0  0xffffffff811afe80 in ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x1\
 08000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2467
 #1  ext4_da_write_end (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x108000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0\
 xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2512
 #2  0xffffffff810d97f1 in generic_perform_write (iocb=, iov=, nr_segs=, pos=0x108000, ppos=0xffff88001e26be40, count=, written=0x0) at mm/filemap.c:2440
 #3  generic_file_buffered_write (iocb=, iov=, nr_segs=, p\
 os=0x108000, ppos=0xffff88001e26be40, count=, written=0x0) at mm/filemap.c:2482
 #4  0xffffffff810db5d1 in __generic_file_aio_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=0x1, ppos=0\
 xffff88001e26be40) at mm/filemap.c:2600
 #5  0xffffffff810db853 in generic_file_aio_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=, pos=) at mm/filemap.c:2632
 #6  0xffffffff811a71aa in ext4_file_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=0x1, pos=0x108000) a\
 t fs/ext4/file.c:136
 #7  0xffffffff811375aa in do_sync_write (filp=0xffff88003f606a80, buf=, len=, \
 ppos=0xffff88001e26bf48) at fs/read_write.c:406
 #8  0xffffffff81137e56 in vfs_write (file=0xffff88003f606a80, buf=0x1ec2960 , count=0x4\
 000, pos=0xffff88001e26bf48) at fs/read_write.c:435
 #9  0xffffffff8113816c in sys_write (fd=, buf=0x1ec2960 , count=0x\
 4000) at fs/read_write.c:487
 #10 
 #11 0x00007f120077a390 in __brk_reservation_fn_dmi_alloc__ ()
 #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
 gdb> print offset
 $22 = 0xffffffffffffffff
 gdb> print idx
 $23 = 0xffffffff
 gdb> print inode->i_blkbits
 $24 = 0xc
 gdb> up
 #1  ext4_da_write_end (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x108000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0\
 xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2512
 2512                    if (ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize(page, end)) {
 gdb> print start
 $25 = 0x0
 gdb> print end
 $26 = 0xffffffffffffffff
 gdb> print pos
 $27 = 0x108000
 gdb> print new_i_size
 $28 = 0x108000
 gdb> print ((struct ext4_inode_info *)((char *)inode-((int)(&((struct ext4_inode_info *)0)->vfs_inode))))->i_disksize
 $29 = 0xd9000
 gdb> down
 2467            for (i = 0; i < idx; i++)
 gdb> print i
 $30 = 0xd44acbee

This is 100% reproducible with some autonuma development code tuned in
a very aggressive manner (not normal way even for knumad) which does
"exotic" changes to the ptes. It wouldn't normally trigger but I don't
see why it can't happen normally if the page is added to swap cache in
between the two faults leading to "copied" being zero (which then
hangs in ext4). So it should be fixed. Especially possible with lumpy
reclaim (albeit disabled if compaction is enabled) as that would
ignore the young bits in the ptes.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: remove i_mutex lock in ext4_evict_inode to fix lockdep complaining

2011-11-11T17:37:16+00:00

commit 8c0bec2151a47906bf779c6715a10ce04453ab77 upstream.

The i_mutex lock and flush_completed_IO() added by commit 2581fdc810
in ext4_evict_inode() causes lockdep complaining about potential
deadlock in several places.  In most/all of these LOCKDEP complaints
it looks like it's a false positive, since many of the potential
circular locking cases can't take place by the time the
ext4_evict_inode() is called; but since at the very least it may mask
real problems, we need to address this.

This change removes the flush_completed_IO() and i_mutex lock in
ext4_evict_inode().  Instead, we take a different approach to resolve
the software lockup that commit 2581fdc810 intends to fix.  Rather
than having ext4-dio-unwritten thread wait for grabing the i_mutex
lock of an inode, we use mutex_trylock() instead, and simply requeue
the work item if we fail to grab the inode's i_mutex lock.

This should speed up work queue processing in general and also
prevents the following deadlock scenario: During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B.
Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero.  However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue.  As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock.  Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

writeback: introduce .tagged_writepages for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage

2011-10-03T18:40:43+00:00

commit 6e6938b6d3130305a5960c86b1a9b21e58cf6144 upstream.

sync(2) is performed in two stages: the WB_SYNC_NONE sync and the
WB_SYNC_ALL sync. Identify the first stage with .tagged_writepages and
do livelock prevention for it, too.

Jan's commit f446daaea9 ("mm: implement writeback livelock avoidance
using page tagging") is a partial fix in that it only fixed the
WB_SYNC_ALL phase livelock.

Although ext4 is tested to no longer livelock with commit f446daaea9,
it may due to some "redirty_tail() after pages_skipped" effect which
is by no means a guarantee for _all_ the file systems.

Note that writeback_inodes_sb() is called by not only sync(), they are
treated the same because the other callers also need livelock prevention.

Impact:  It changes the order in which pages/inodes are synced to disk.
Now in the WB_SYNC_NONE stage, it won't proceed to write the next inode
until finished with the current inode.

Acked-by: Jan Kara 
CC: Dave Chinner 
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix nomblk_io_submit option so it correctly converts uninit blocks

2011-08-29T20:29:11+00:00

commit 9dd75f1f1a02d656a11a7b9b9e6c2759b9c1e946 upstream.

Bug discovered by Jan Kara:

Finally, commit 1449032be17abb69116dbc393f67ceb8bd034f92 returned back
the old IO submission code but apparently it forgot to return the old
handling of uninitialized buffers so we unconditionnaly call
block_write_full_page() without specifying end_io function. So AFAICS
we never convert unwritten extents to written in some cases. For
example when I mount the fs as: mount -t ext4 -o
nomblk_io_submit,dioread_nolock /dev/ubdb /mnt and do
        int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0600);
        char buf[1024];
        memset(buf, 'a', sizeof(buf));
        fallocate(fd, 0, 0, 16384);
        write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));

I get a file full of zeros (after remounting the filesystem so that
pagecache is dropped) instead of seeing the first KB contain 'a's.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: Resolve the hang of direct i/o read in handling EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN.

2011-08-29T20:29:11+00:00

commit 32c80b32c053dc52712dedac5e4d0aa7c93fc353 upstream.

EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten
should be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear
the flag and decrease the counter in the same time.

We don't increase i_aiodio_unwritten when setting
EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN so it will go nagative and causes some process
to wait forever.

Part of the patch came from Eric in his e-mail, but it doesn't fix the
problem met by Michael actually.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=131316851417460&w=2

Reported-and-Tested-by: Michael Tokarev
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen 
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in ext4_evict_inode

2011-08-29T20:29:10+00:00

commit 2581fdc810889fdea97689cb62481201d579c796 upstream.

Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to
prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while
some process is writing inode A. During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode
B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.

Also moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from
ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode(). During inode deleteion,
ext4_evict_inode() is called before ext4_destroy_inode() and in
ext4_evict_inode(), we may call ext4_truncate() without holding
i_mutex lock. As a result, there is a race between flush_completed_IO
that is called from ext4_ext_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work, which
may cause corruption on an io_end structure. This change moves
ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode()
to ext4_evict_inode() to resolve the race between ext4_truncate() and
ext4_end_io_work during inode deletion.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman