linux-toradex.git/fs/ext4, branch v3.0.16

ext4: handle EOF correctly in ext4_bio_write_page()

2011-12-21T20:57:44+00:00

commit 5a0dc7365c240795bf190766eba7a27600be3b3e upstream.

We need to zero out part of a page which beyond EOF before setting uptodate,
otherwise, mapread or write will see non-zero data beyond EOF.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: avoid potential hang in mpage_submit_io() when blocksize < pagesize

2011-12-21T20:57:44+00:00

commit 13a79a4741d37fda2fbafb953f0f301dc007928f upstream.

If there is an unwritten but clean buffer in a page and there is a
dirty buffer after the buffer, then mpage_submit_io does not write the
dirty buffer out.  As a result, da_writepages loops forever.

This patch fixes the problem by checking dirty flag.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: avoid hangs in ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize()

2011-12-21T20:57:44+00:00

commit ea51d132dbf9b00063169c1159bee253d9649224 upstream.

If the pte mapping in generic_perform_write() is unmapped between
iov_iter_fault_in_readable() and iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(), the
"copied" parameter to ->end_write can be zero. ext4 couldn't cope with
it with delayed allocations enabled. This skips the i_disksize
enlargement logic if copied is zero and no new data was appeneded to
the inode.

 gdb> bt
 #0  0xffffffff811afe80 in ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x1\
 08000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2467
 #1  ext4_da_write_end (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x108000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0\
 xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2512
 #2  0xffffffff810d97f1 in generic_perform_write (iocb=, iov=, nr_segs=, pos=0x108000, ppos=0xffff88001e26be40, count=, written=0x0) at mm/filemap.c:2440
 #3  generic_file_buffered_write (iocb=, iov=, nr_segs=, p\
 os=0x108000, ppos=0xffff88001e26be40, count=, written=0x0) at mm/filemap.c:2482
 #4  0xffffffff810db5d1 in __generic_file_aio_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=0x1, ppos=0\
 xffff88001e26be40) at mm/filemap.c:2600
 #5  0xffffffff810db853 in generic_file_aio_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=, pos=) at mm/filemap.c:2632
 #6  0xffffffff811a71aa in ext4_file_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=0x1, pos=0x108000) a\
 t fs/ext4/file.c:136
 #7  0xffffffff811375aa in do_sync_write (filp=0xffff88003f606a80, buf=, len=, \
 ppos=0xffff88001e26bf48) at fs/read_write.c:406
 #8  0xffffffff81137e56 in vfs_write (file=0xffff88003f606a80, buf=0x1ec2960 , count=0x4\
 000, pos=0xffff88001e26bf48) at fs/read_write.c:435
 #9  0xffffffff8113816c in sys_write (fd=, buf=0x1ec2960 , count=0x\
 4000) at fs/read_write.c:487
 #10 
 #11 0x00007f120077a390 in __brk_reservation_fn_dmi_alloc__ ()
 #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
 gdb> print offset
 $22 = 0xffffffffffffffff
 gdb> print idx
 $23 = 0xffffffff
 gdb> print inode->i_blkbits
 $24 = 0xc
 gdb> up
 #1  ext4_da_write_end (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x108000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0\
 xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2512
 2512                    if (ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize(page, end)) {
 gdb> print start
 $25 = 0x0
 gdb> print end
 $26 = 0xffffffffffffffff
 gdb> print pos
 $27 = 0x108000
 gdb> print new_i_size
 $28 = 0x108000
 gdb> print ((struct ext4_inode_info *)((char *)inode-((int)(&((struct ext4_inode_info *)0)->vfs_inode))))->i_disksize
 $29 = 0xd9000
 gdb> down
 2467            for (i = 0; i < idx; i++)
 gdb> print i
 $30 = 0xd44acbee

This is 100% reproducible with some autonuma development code tuned in
a very aggressive manner (not normal way even for knumad) which does
"exotic" changes to the ptes. It wouldn't normally trigger but I don't
see why it can't happen normally if the page is added to swap cache in
between the two faults leading to "copied" being zero (which then
hangs in ext4). So it should be fixed. Especially possible with lumpy
reclaim (albeit disabled if compaction is enabled) as that would
ignore the young bits in the ptes.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: display the correct mount option in /proc/mounts for [no]init_itable

2011-12-21T20:57:43+00:00

commit fc6cb1cda5db7b2d24bf32890826214b857c728e upstream.

/proc/mounts was showing the mount option [no]init_inode_table when
the correct mount option that will be accepted by parse_options() is
[no]init_itable.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: remove i_mutex lock in ext4_evict_inode to fix lockdep complaining

2011-11-11T17:37:16+00:00

commit 8c0bec2151a47906bf779c6715a10ce04453ab77 upstream.

The i_mutex lock and flush_completed_IO() added by commit 2581fdc810
in ext4_evict_inode() causes lockdep complaining about potential
deadlock in several places.  In most/all of these LOCKDEP complaints
it looks like it's a false positive, since many of the potential
circular locking cases can't take place by the time the
ext4_evict_inode() is called; but since at the very least it may mask
real problems, we need to address this.

This change removes the flush_completed_IO() and i_mutex lock in
ext4_evict_inode().  Instead, we take a different approach to resolve
the software lockup that commit 2581fdc810 intends to fix.  Rather
than having ext4-dio-unwritten thread wait for grabing the i_mutex
lock of an inode, we use mutex_trylock() instead, and simply requeue
the work item if we fail to grab the inode's i_mutex lock.

This should speed up work queue processing in general and also
prevents the following deadlock scenario: During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B.
Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero.  However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue.  As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock.  Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix race in xattr block allocation path

2011-11-11T17:36:34+00:00

commit 6d6a435190bdf2e04c9465cde5bdc3ac68cf11a4 upstream.

Ceph users reported that when using Ceph on ext4, the filesystem
would often become corrupted, containing inodes with incorrect
i_blocks counters.

I managed to reproduce this with a very hacked-up "streamtest"
binary from the Ceph tree.

Ceph is doing a lot of xattr writes, to out-of-inode blocks.
There is also another thread which does sync_file_range and close,
of the same files.  The problem appears to happen due to this race:

sync/flush thread               xattr-set thread
-----------------               ----------------

do_writepages                   ext4_xattr_set
ext4_da_writepages              ext4_xattr_set_handle
mpage_da_map_blocks             ext4_xattr_block_set
        set DELALLOC_RESERVE
                                ext4_new_meta_blocks
                                        ext4_mb_new_blocks
                                                if (!i_delalloc_reserved_flag)
                                                        vfs_dq_alloc_block
ext4_get_blocks
	down_write(i_data_sem)
        set i_delalloc_reserved_flag
	...
	up_write(i_data_sem)
                                        if (i_delalloc_reserved_flag)
                                                vfs_dq_alloc_block_nofail


In other words, the sync/flush thread pops in and sets
i_delalloc_reserved_flag on the inode, which makes the xattr thread
think that it's in a delalloc path in ext4_new_meta_blocks(),
and add the block for a second time, after already having added
it once in the !i_delalloc_reserved_flag case in ext4_mb_new_blocks

The real problem is that we shouldn't be using the DELALLOC_RESERVED
state flag, and instead we should be passing
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE down to ext4_map_blocks() instead of
using an inode state flag.  We'll fix this for now with using
i_data_sem to prevent this race, but this is really not the right way
to fix things.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata with correct inode in ext4_dx_add_entry

2011-11-11T17:36:34+00:00

commit 5930ea643805feb50a2f8383ae12eb6f10935e49 upstream.

ext4_dx_add_entry manipulates bh2 and frames[0].bh, which are two buffer_heads
that point to directory blocks assigned to the directory inode.  However, the
function calls ext4_handle_dirty_metadata with the inode of the file that's
being added to the directory, not the directory inode itself.  Therefore,
correct the code to dirty the directory buffers with the directory inode, not
the file inode.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: ext4_mkdir should dirty dir_block with newly created directory inode

2011-11-11T17:36:34+00:00

commit f9287c1f2d329f4d78a3bbc9cf0db0ebae6f146a upstream.

ext4_mkdir calls ext4_handle_dirty_metadata with dir_block and the inode "dir".
Unfortunately, dir_block belongs to the newly created directory (which is
"inode"), not the parent directory (which is "dir").  Fix the incorrect
association.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: ext4_rename should dirty dir_bh with the correct directory

2011-11-11T17:36:33+00:00

commit bcaa992975041e40449be8c010c26192b8c8b409 upstream.

When ext4_rename performs a directory rename (move), dir_bh is a
buffer that is modified to update the '..' link in the directory being
moved (old_inode).  However, ext4_handle_dirty_metadata is called with
the old parent directory inode (old_dir) and dir_bh, which is
incorrect because dir_bh does not belong to the parent inode.  Fix
this error.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2,ext3,ext4: don't inherit APPEND_FL or IMMUTABLE_FL for new inodes

2011-11-11T17:36:32+00:00

commit 1cd9f0976aa4606db8d6e3dc3edd0aca8019372a upstream.

This doesn't make much sense, and it exposes a bug in the kernel where
attempts to create a new file in an append-only directory using
O_CREAT will fail (but still leave a zero-length file).  This was
discovered when xfstests #79 was generalized so it could run on all
file systems.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman