linux-toradex.git/fs/fscache, branch master

netfs, fscache: Move fs/fscache/* into fs/netfs/

2023-12-24T11:36:00+00:00

There's a problem with dependencies between netfslib and fscache as each
wants to access some functions of the other.  Deal with this by moving
fs/fscache/* into fs/netfs/ and renaming those files to begin with
"fscache-".

For the moment, the moved files are changed as little as possible and an
fscache module is still built.  A subsequent patch will integrate them.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
cc: Christian Brauner 
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com

fscache: Use clear_and_wake_up_bit() in fscache_create_volume_work()

2023-01-30T12:51:54+00:00

fscache_create_volume_work() uses wake_up_bit() to wake up the processes
which are waiting for the completion of volume creation. According to
comments in wake_up_bit() and waitqueue_active(), an extra smp_mb() is
needed to guarantee the memory order between FSCACHE_VOLUME_CREATING
flag and waitqueue_active() before invoking wake_up_bit().

Fixing it by using clear_and_wake_up_bit() to add the missing memory
barrier.

Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu 
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113115211.2895845-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ # v3

fscache: Use wait_on_bit() to wait for the freeing of relinquished volume

2023-01-30T12:51:53+00:00

The freeing of relinquished volume will wake up the pending volume
acquisition by using wake_up_bit(), however it is mismatched with
wait_var_event() used in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision() and it will
never wake up the waiter in the wait-queue because these two functions
operate on different wait-queues.

According to the implementation in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(),
if the wake-up of pending acquisition is delayed longer than 20 seconds
(e.g., due to the delay of on-demand fd closing), the first
wait_var_event_timeout() will timeout and the following wait_var_event()
will hang forever as shown below:

 FS-Cache: Potential volume collision new=00000024 old=00000022
 ......
 INFO: task mount:1148 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
       Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6+ #1
 task:mount           state:D stack:0     pid:1148  ppid:1
 Call Trace:
  
  __schedule+0x2f6/0xb80
  schedule+0x67/0xe0
  fscache_wait_on_volume_collision.cold+0x80/0x82
  __fscache_acquire_volume+0x40d/0x4e0
  erofs_fscache_register_volume+0x51/0xe0 [erofs]
  erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x19c/0x240 [erofs]
  erofs_fc_fill_super+0x746/0xaf0 [erofs]
  vfs_get_super+0x7d/0x100
  get_tree_nodev+0x16/0x20
  erofs_fc_get_tree+0x20/0x30 [erofs]
  vfs_get_tree+0x24/0xb0
  path_mount+0x2fa/0xa90
  do_mount+0x7c/0xa0
  __x64_sys_mount+0x8b/0xe0
  do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Considering that wake_up_bit() is more selective, so fix it by using
wait_on_bit() instead of wait_var_event() to wait for the freeing of
relinquished volume. In addition because waitqueue_active() is used in
wake_up_bit() and clear_bit() doesn't imply any memory barrier, use
clear_and_wake_up_bit() to add the missing memory barrier between
cursor->flags and waitqueue_active().

Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration")
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu 
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113115211.2895845-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ # v3

Merge tag 'pull-iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

2022-12-13T02:29:54+00:00

Pull iov_iter updates from Al Viro:
 "iov_iter work; most of that is about getting rid of direction
  misannotations and (hopefully) preventing more of the same for the
  future"

* tag 'pull-iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers
  iov_iter: saner checks for attempt to copy to/from iterator
  [xen] fix "direction" argument of iov_iter_kvec()
  [vhost] fix 'direction' argument of iov_iter_{init,bvec}()
  [target] fix iov_iter_bvec() "direction" argument
  [s390] memcpy_real(): WRITE is "data source", not destination...
  [s390] zcore: WRITE is "data source", not destination...
  [infiniband] READ is "data destination", not source...
  [fsi] WRITE is "data source", not destination...
  [s390] copy_oldmem_kernel() - WRITE is "data source", not destination
  csum_and_copy_to_iter(): handle ITER_DISCARD
  get rid of unlikely() on page_copy_sane() calls

fscache: Fix oops due to race with cookie_lru and use_cookie

2022-12-07T19:49:18+00:00

If a cookie expires from the LRU and the LRU_DISCARD flag is set, but
the state machine has not run yet, it's possible another thread can call
fscache_use_cookie and begin to use it.

When the cookie_worker finally runs, it will see the LRU_DISCARD flag
set, transition the cookie->state to LRU_DISCARDING, which will then
withdraw the cookie.  Once the cookie is withdrawn the object is removed
the below oops will occur because the object associated with the cookie
is now NULL.

Fix the oops by clearing the LRU_DISCARD bit if another thread uses the
cookie before the cookie_worker runs.

  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
  ...
  CPU: 31 PID: 44773 Comm: kworker/u130:1 Tainted: G     E    6.0.0-5.dneg.x86_64 #1
  Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/26/2022
  Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work [netfs]
  RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x28/0x90 [cachefiles]
  ...
  Call Trace:
    netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x11c/0x320 [netfs]
    process_one_work+0x217/0x3e0
    worker_thread+0x4a/0x3b0
    kthread+0xd6/0x100

Fixes: 12bb21a29c19 ("fscache: Implement cookie user counting and resource pinning")
Reported-by: Daire Byrne 
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Tested-by: Daire Byrne 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117115023.1350181-1-dwysocha@redhat.com/ # v1
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117142915.1366990-1-dwysocha@redhat.com/ # v2
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers

2022-11-25T18:01:55+00:00

READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are
"data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as
used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as
"we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly
the wrong way.

Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder
to misinterpret...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fscache: fix OOB Read in __fscache_acquire_volume

2022-11-23T18:31:13+00:00

The type of a->key[0] is char in fscache_volume_same().  If the length
of cache volume key is greater than 127, the value of a->key[0] is less
than 0.  In this case, klen becomes much larger than 255 after type
conversion, because the type of klen is size_t.  As a result, memcmp()
is read out of bounds.

This causes a slab-out-of-bounds Read in __fscache_acquire_volume(), as
reported by Syzbot.

Fix this by changing the type of the stored key to "u8 *" rather than
"char *" (it isn't a simple string anyway).  Also put in a check that
the volume name doesn't exceed NAME_MAX.

  BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in memcmp+0x16f/0x1c0 lib/string.c:757
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888016f3aa90 by task syz-executor344/3613
  Call Trace:
   memcmp+0x16f/0x1c0 lib/string.c:757
   memcmp include/linux/fortify-string.h:420 [inline]
   fscache_volume_same fs/fscache/volume.c:133 [inline]
   fscache_hash_volume fs/fscache/volume.c:171 [inline]
   __fscache_acquire_volume+0x76c/0x1080 fs/fscache/volume.c:328
   fscache_acquire_volume include/linux/fscache.h:204 [inline]
   v9fs_cache_session_get_cookie+0x143/0x240 fs/9p/cache.c:34
   v9fs_session_init+0x1166/0x1810 fs/9p/v9fs.c:473
   v9fs_mount+0xba/0xc90 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:126
   legacy_get_tree+0x105/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
   vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1530
   do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3040 [inline]
   path_mount+0x1326/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
   do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
   __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
   __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
   __x64_sys_mount+0x27f/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568

Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration")
Reported-by: syzbot+a76f6a6e524cf2080aa3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Reviewed-by: Zhang Peng 
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu 
cc: Dominique Martinet 
cc: Jeff Layton 
cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y3OH+Dmi0QIOK18n@codewreck.org/ # Zhang Peng's v1 fix
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115140447.2971680-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com/ # Zhang Peng's v2 fix
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166869954095.3793579.8500020902371015443.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

fscache: add tracepoint when failing cookie

2022-08-09T13:13:59+00:00

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: David Howells

fscache: don't leak cookie access refs if invalidation is in progress or failed

2022-08-09T13:13:55+00:00

It's possible for a request to invalidate a fscache_cookie will come in
while we're already processing an invalidation. If that happens we
currently take an extra access reference that will leak. Only call
__fscache_begin_cookie_access if the FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_INVALIDATE bit
was previously clear.

Also, ensure that we attempt to clear the bit when the cookie is
"FAILED" and put the reference to avoid an access leak.

Fixes: 85e4ea1049c7 ("fscache: Fix invalidation/lookup race")
Suggested-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: David Howells

fscache: Fix invalidation/lookup race

2022-07-05T15:12:55+00:00

If an NFS file is opened for writing and closed, fscache_invalidate() will
be asked to invalidate the file - however, if the cookie is in the
LOOKING_UP state (or the CREATING state), then request to invalidate
doesn't get recorded for fscache_cookie_state_machine() to do something
with.

Fix this by making __fscache_invalidate() set a flag if it sees the cookie
is in the LOOKING_UP state to indicate that we need to go to invalidation.
Note that this requires a count on the n_accesses counter for the state
machine, which that will release when it's done.

fscache_cookie_state_machine() then shifts to the INVALIDATING state if it
sees the flag.

Without this, an nfs file can get corrupted if it gets modified locally and
then read locally as the cache contents may not get updated.

Fixes: d24af13e2e23 ("fscache: Implement cookie invalidation")
Reported-by: Max Kellermann 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Tested-by: Max Kellermann 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YlWWbpW5Foynjllo@rabbit.intern.cm-ag [1]