new helper (wrapper around mnt_drop_write()) to be used in pair with
mnt_want_write_file().

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

it's both faster (in case when file has been opened for write) and cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

And give it a kernel-doc comment.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: btrfs changed in linux-next]
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Fix a flag checking artifact in hfsplus_ioctl_getflags() routine
found while doing clean-up against assignments inside `if's.

Signed-off-by: Anton Salikhmetov <alexo@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

Avoid doing unessecary work in fsync.  Do nothing unless the inode
was marked dirty, and only write the various metadata inodes out if
they contain any dirty state from this inode.  This is archived by
adding three new dirty bits to the hfsplus-specific inode which are
set in the correct places.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

This was supposed to be a mutex_unlock() instead of a mutex_lock().

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

We need to support -EOPNOTSUPP for attributes that are not supported to
match other filesystems and allow userspace to detect if Posix ACLs
are supported or not.  setxattr already gets this right.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

The rootflags field in hfsplus_inode_info only caches the immutable and
append-only flags in the VFS inode, so we can easily get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

HFSPLUS_I doesn't return a pointer to the hfsplus-specific inode
information like all other FOO_I macros, but dereference the pointer in a way
that made it look like a direct struct derefence.  This only works as long
as the HFSPLUS_I macro is used directly and prevents us from keepig a local
hfsplus_inode_info pointer.  Fix the calling convention and introduce a local
hip variable in all functions that use it constantly.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

HFSPLUS_SB doesn't return a pointer to the hfsplus-specific superblock
information like all other FOO_SB macros, but dereference the pointer in a way
that made it look like a direct struct derefence.  This only works as long
as the HFSPLUS_SB macro is used directly and prevents us from keepig a local
hfsplus_sb_info pointer.  Fix the calling convention and introduce a local
sbi variable in all functions that use it constantly.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>