linux-toradex.git/fs/ocfs2/aops.h, branch v5.0

ocfs2: keep the trace point consistent with the function name

2018-04-06T04:36:21+00:00

Keep the trace point consistent with the function name.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/02609aba-84b2-a22d-3f3b-bc1944b94260@huawei.com
Fixes: 3ef045c3d8ae ("ocfs2: switch to ->write_iter()")
Signed-off-by: Jia Guo 
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao 
Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang 
Reviewed-by: Alex Chen 
Acked-by: Gang He 
Acked-by: Joseph Qi 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Cc: Junxiao Bi 
Cc: Changwei Ge 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: clean up unused 'page' parameter in ocfs2_write_end_nolock()

2016-12-13T02:55:06+00:00

'page' parameter in ocfs2_write_end_nolock() is never used.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/582FD91A.5000902@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao 
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Cc: Junxiao Bi 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: fix ip_unaligned_aio deadlock with dio work queue

2016-03-25T23:37:42+00:00

In the current implementation of unaligned aio+dio, lock order behave as
follow:

in user process context:
  -> call io_submit()
    -> get i_mutex
		<== window1
      -> get ip_unaligned_aio
        -> submit direct io to block device
    -> release i_mutex
  -> io_submit() return

in dio work queue context(the work queue is created in __blockdev_direct_IO):
  -> release ip_unaligned_aio
		<== window2
    -> get i_mutex
      -> clear unwritten flag & change i_size
    -> release i_mutex

There is a limitation to the thread number of dio work queue.  256 at
default.  If all 256 thread are in the above 'window2' stage, and there
is a user process in the 'window1' stage, the system will became
deadlock.  Since the user process hold i_mutex to wait ip_unaligned_aio
lock, while there is a direct bio hold ip_unaligned_aio mutex who is
waiting for a dio work queue thread to be schedule.  But all the dio
work queue thread is waiting for i_mutex lock in 'window2'.

This case only happened in a test which send a large number(more than
256) of aio at one io_submit() call.

My design is to remove ip_unaligned_aio lock.  Change it to a sync io
instead.  Just like ip_unaligned_aio lock, serialize the unaligned aio
dio.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove OCFS2_IOCB_UNALIGNED_IO, per Junxiao Bi]
Signed-off-by: Ryan Ding 
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi 
Cc: Joseph Qi 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: add ocfs2_write_type_t type to identify the caller of write

2016-03-25T23:37:42+00:00

Patchset: fix ocfs2 direct io code patch to support sparse file and data
ordering semantics

The idea is to use buffer io(more precisely use the interface
ocfs2_write_begin_nolock & ocfs2_write_end_nolock) to do the zero work
beyond block size.  And clear UNWRITTEN flag until direct io data has
been written to disk, which can prevent data corruption when system
crashed during direct write.

And we will also archive a better performance: eg.  dd direct write new
file with block size 4KB: before this patchset:
  2.5 MB/s
after this patchset:
  66.4 MB/s

This patch (of 8):

To support direct io in ocfs2_write_begin_nolock &
ocfs2_write_end_nolock.

Remove unused args filp & flags.  Add new arg type.  The type is one of
buffer/direct/mmap.  Indicate 3 way to perform write.  buffer/mmap type
has implemented.  direct type will be implemented later.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Ding 
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi 
Cc: Joseph Qi 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: remove OCFS2_IOCB_SEM lock type in direct io

2015-06-25T00:49:39+00:00

In ocfs2 direct read/write, OCFS2_IOCB_SEM lock type is used to protect
inode->i_alloc_sem rw semaphore lock in the earlier kernel version.
However, in the latest kernel, inode->i_alloc_sem rw semaphore lock is not
used at all, so OCFS2_IOCB_SEM lock type needs to be removed.

Signed-off-by: Weiwei Wang 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h

2015-03-26T00:28:11+00:00

struct kiocb now is a generic I/O container, so move it to fs.h.
Also do a #include diet for aio.h while we're at it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

ocfs2: change ip_unaligned_aio to of type mutex from atomit_t

2014-04-03T23:20:53+00:00

There is a problem that waitqueue_active() may check stale data thus miss
a wakeup of threads waiting on ip_unaligned_aio.

The valid value of ip_unaligned_aio is only 0 and 1 so we can change it to
be of type mutex thus the above prolem is avoid.  Another benifit is that
mutex which works as FIFO is fairer than wake_up_all().

Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

aio: don't include aio.h in sched.h

2013-05-08T03:16:25+00:00

Faster kernel compiles by way of fewer unnecessary includes.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet 
Cc: Zach Brown 
Cc: Felipe Balbi 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Cc: Rusty Russell 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Asai Thambi S P 
Cc: Selvan Mani 
Cc: Sam Bradshaw 
Cc: Jeff Moyer 
Cc: Al Viro 
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise 
Reviewed-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: serialize unaligned aio

2011-07-28T09:07:16+00:00

Fix a corruption that can happen when we have (two or more) outstanding
aio's to an overlapping unaligned region.  Ext4
(e9e3bcecf44c04b9e6b505fd8e2eb9cea58fb94d) and xfs recently had to fix
similar issues.

In our case what happens is that we can have an outstanding aio on a region
and if a write comes in with some bytes overlapping the original aio we may
decide to read that region into a page before continuing (typically because
of buffered-io fallback).  Since we have no ordering guarantees with the
aio, we can read stale or bad data into the page and then write it back out.

If the i/o is page and block aligned, then we avoid this issue as there
won't be any need to read data from disk.

I took the same approach as Eric in the ext4 patch and introduced some
serialization of unaligned async direct i/o.  I don't expect this to have an
effect on the most common cases of AIO.  Unaligned aio will be slower
though, but that's far more acceptable than data corruption.

Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh 
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker

Fix common misspellings

2011-03-31T14:26:23+00:00

Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi