linux-toradex.git/fs/reiserfs/super.c, branch v3.6-rc1 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs method 2012-07-22T19:58:34+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2012-07-03T14:45:29+00:00 a1177825719ccef3f76ef39bbfd5ebb6087d53c7 Since the moment writes to quota files are using block device page cache and space for quota structures is reserved at the moment they are first accessed we have no reason to sync quota before inode writeback. In fact this order is now only harmful since quota information can easily change during inode writeback (either because conversion of delayed-allocated extents or simply because of allocation of new blocks for simple filesystems not using page_mkwrite). So move syncing of quota information after writeback of inodes into ->sync_fs method. This way we do not have to use ->quota_sync callback which is primarily intended for use by quotactl syscall anyway and we get rid of calling ->sync_fs() twice unnecessarily. We skip quota syncing for OCFS2 since it does proper quota journalling in all cases (unlike ext3, ext4, and reiserfs which also support legacy non-journalled quotas) and thus there are no dirty quota structures. CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> CC: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
Since the moment writes to quota files are using block device page cache and
space for quota structures is reserved at the moment they are first accessed we
have no reason to sync quota before inode writeback. In fact this order is now
only harmful since quota information can easily change during inode writeback
(either because conversion of delayed-allocated extents or simply because of
allocation of new blocks for simple filesystems not using page_mkwrite).

So move syncing of quota information after writeback of inodes into ->sync_fs
method. This way we do not have to use ->quota_sync callback which is primarily
intended for use by quotactl syscall anyway and we get rid of calling
->sync_fs() twice unnecessarily. We skip quota syncing for OCFS2 since it does
proper quota journalling in all cases (unlike ext3, ext4, and reiserfs which
also support legacy non-journalled quotas) and thus there are no dirty quota
structures.

CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
reiserfs: get rid of resierfs_sync_super 2012-06-01T14:37:36+00:00 Artem Bityutskiy artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com 2012-06-01T14:18:08+00:00 033369d1af1264abc23bea2e174aa47cdd212f6f This patch stops reiserfs using the VFS 'write_super()' method along with the s_dirt flag, because they are on their way out. The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and writes out all dirty superblock using the '->write_super()' call-back. But the problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every 5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use '->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove it together with the kernel thread. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
This patch stops reiserfs using the VFS 'write_super()' method along with the
s_dirt flag, because they are on their way out.

The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
writes out all dirty superblock using the '->write_super()' call-back.  But the
problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
'->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
it together with the kernel thread.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
reiserfs: cleanup reiserfs_fill_super a bit 2012-06-01T14:37:36+00:00 Artem Bityutskiy artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com 2012-06-01T14:18:04+00:00 efaa33eb1309d65528d5a54d87d69bdcbdae8c10 We have the reiserfs superblock pointer in the 'sbi' variable in this function, no need to use the 'REISERFS_SB(s)' macro which is the same. This is jut a small clean-up. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
We have the reiserfs superblock pointer in the 'sbi' variable in this
function, no need to use the 'REISERFS_SB(s)' macro which is the same.
This is jut a small clean-up.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
reiserfs: Remove i_mutex use from reiserfs_quota_write() 2012-05-15T21:34:38+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2012-04-25T19:28:12+00:00 67f1648d217c3b8165ca114c7838164f31e15790 We don't need i_mutex in reiserfs_quota_write() because writes to quota file are serialized by dqio_mutex anyway. Changes to quota files outside of quota code are forbidded and enforced by NOATIME and IMMUTABLE bits. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 
We don't need i_mutex in reiserfs_quota_write() because writes to quota file
are serialized by dqio_mutex anyway. Changes to quota files outside of quota
code are forbidded and enforced by NOATIME and IMMUTABLE bits.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
move private bits of reiserfs_fs.h to fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h 2012-03-21T01:29:43+00:00 Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk 2012-03-17T05:16:43+00:00 f466c6fdb3b1f043ff1977a8d2a1d0cd4dc164fa Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
move reiserfs_acl.h to fs/reiserfs/acl.h 2012-03-21T01:29:42+00:00 Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk 2012-03-17T05:03:10+00:00 a3063ab88fcbe5249f841cb95dfd626b8bf2674f Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
take private bits of reiserfs_xattr.h to fs/reiserfs/xattr.h 2012-03-21T01:29:42+00:00 Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk 2012-03-17T04:59:06+00:00 c45ac8887e778c4fa2b572c51a94a681a0955d4d Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
switch open-coded instances of d_make_root() to new helper 2012-03-21T01:29:35+00:00 Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk 2012-01-09T03:15:13+00:00 48fde701aff662559b38d9a609574068f22d00fe Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
reiserfs: don't lock root inode searching 2012-01-11T00:30:54+00:00 Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@gmail.com 2012-01-10T23:11:11+00:00 9b467e6ebebbe75288aeb7e816ffbb5d35d6eaa3 Nothing requires that we lock the filesystem until the root inode is provided. Also iget5_locked() triggers a warning because we are holding the filesystem lock while allocating the inode, which result in a lockdep suspicion that we have a lock inversion against the reclaim path: [ 1986.896979] ================================= [ 1986.896990] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 1986.896997] 3.1.1-main #8 [ 1986.897001] --------------------------------- [ 1986.897007] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage. [ 1986.897016] kswapd0/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 1986.897023] (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a [ 1986.897044] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 1986.897050] [<c014a5b9>] mark_held_locks+0xae/0xd0 [ 1986.897060] [<c014aab3>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7d/0x91 [ 1986.897068] [<c0190ee0>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0x93 [ 1986.897078] [<c01e7728>] reiserfs_alloc_inode+0x13/0x3d [ 1986.897088] [<c01a5b06>] alloc_inode+0x14/0x5f [ 1986.897097] [<c01a5cb9>] iget5_locked+0x62/0x13a [ 1986.897106] [<c01e99e0>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x410/0x8b9 [ 1986.897114] [<c01953da>] mount_bdev+0x10b/0x159 [ 1986.897123] [<c01e764d>] get_super_block+0x10/0x12 [ 1986.897131] [<c0195b38>] mount_fs+0x59/0x12d [ 1986.897138] [<c01a80d1>] vfs_kern_mount+0x45/0x7a [ 1986.897147] [<c01a83e3>] do_kern_mount+0x2f/0xb0 [ 1986.897155] [<c01a987a>] do_mount+0x5c2/0x612 [ 1986.897163] [<c01a9a72>] sys_mount+0x61/0x8f [ 1986.897170] [<c044060c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 [ 1986.897181] irq event stamp: 7509691 [ 1986.897186] hardirqs last enabled at (7509691): [<c0190f34>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6e/0x93 [ 1986.897197] hardirqs last disabled at (7509690): [<c0190eea>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x24/0x93 [ 1986.897209] softirqs last enabled at (7508896): [<c01294bd>] __do_softirq+0xee/0xfd [ 1986.897222] softirqs last disabled at (7508859): [<c01030ed>] do_softirq+0x50/0x9d [ 1986.897234] [ 1986.897235] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1986.897242] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1986.897244] [ 1986.897250] CPU0 [ 1986.897254] ---- [ 1986.897257] lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock); [ 1986.897265] <Interrupt> [ 1986.897269] lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock); [ 1986.897276] [ 1986.897277] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1986.897278] [ 1986.897286] no locks held by kswapd0/16. [ 1986.897291] [ 1986.897292] stack backtrace: [ 1986.897299] Pid: 16, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.1-main #8 [ 1986.897306] Call Trace: [ 1986.897314] [<c0439e76>] ? printk+0xf/0x11 [ 1986.897324] [<c01482d1>] print_usage_bug+0x20e/0x21a [ 1986.897332] [<c01479b8>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug+0x172/0x172 [ 1986.897341] [<c014855c>] mark_lock+0x27f/0x483 [ 1986.897349] [<c0148d88>] __lock_acquire+0x628/0x1472 [ 1986.897358] [<c0149fae>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e [ 1986.897366] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a [ 1986.897384] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a [ 1986.897397] [<c043b5ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x35/0x26f [ 1986.897409] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a [ 1986.897421] [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a [ 1986.897433] [<c01e2edd>] map_block_for_writepage+0xc9/0x590 [ 1986.897448] [<c01b1706>] ? create_empty_buffers+0x33/0x8f [ 1986.897461] [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31 [ 1986.897472] [<c043ef7f>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x81/0x8e [ 1986.897485] [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d [ 1986.897496] [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31 [ 1986.897508] [<c01e355d>] reiserfs_writepage+0x1b9/0x3e7 [ 1986.897521] [<c0173b40>] ? clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xcb/0xde [ 1986.897533] [<c014a6e3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x108/0x138 [ 1986.897546] [<c014a71e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 1986.897559] [<c0177b38>] shrink_page_list+0x34f/0x5e2 [ 1986.897572] [<c01780a7>] shrink_inactive_list+0x172/0x22c [ 1986.897585] [<c0178464>] shrink_zone+0x303/0x3b1 [ 1986.897597] [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d [ 1986.897611] [<c01788c9>] kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2 The deadlock shouldn't happen since we are doing that allocation in the mount path, the filesystem is not available for any reclaim. Still the warning is annoying. To solve this, acquire the lock later only where we need it, right before calling reiserfs_read_locked_inode() that wants to lock to walk the tree. Reported-by: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 
Nothing requires that we lock the filesystem until the root inode is
provided.

Also iget5_locked() triggers a warning because we are holding the
filesystem lock while allocating the inode, which result in a lockdep
suspicion that we have a lock inversion against the reclaim path:

[ 1986.896979] =================================
[ 1986.896990] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 1986.896997] 3.1.1-main #8
[ 1986.897001] ---------------------------------
[ 1986.897007] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
[ 1986.897016] kswapd0/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 1986.897023]  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
[ 1986.897044] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
[ 1986.897050]   [<c014a5b9>] mark_held_locks+0xae/0xd0
[ 1986.897060]   [<c014aab3>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7d/0x91
[ 1986.897068]   [<c0190ee0>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0x93
[ 1986.897078]   [<c01e7728>] reiserfs_alloc_inode+0x13/0x3d
[ 1986.897088]   [<c01a5b06>] alloc_inode+0x14/0x5f
[ 1986.897097]   [<c01a5cb9>] iget5_locked+0x62/0x13a
[ 1986.897106]   [<c01e99e0>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x410/0x8b9
[ 1986.897114]   [<c01953da>] mount_bdev+0x10b/0x159
[ 1986.897123]   [<c01e764d>] get_super_block+0x10/0x12
[ 1986.897131]   [<c0195b38>] mount_fs+0x59/0x12d
[ 1986.897138]   [<c01a80d1>] vfs_kern_mount+0x45/0x7a
[ 1986.897147]   [<c01a83e3>] do_kern_mount+0x2f/0xb0
[ 1986.897155]   [<c01a987a>] do_mount+0x5c2/0x612
[ 1986.897163]   [<c01a9a72>] sys_mount+0x61/0x8f
[ 1986.897170]   [<c044060c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
[ 1986.897181] irq event stamp: 7509691
[ 1986.897186] hardirqs last  enabled at (7509691): [<c0190f34>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6e/0x93
[ 1986.897197] hardirqs last disabled at (7509690): [<c0190eea>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x24/0x93
[ 1986.897209] softirqs last  enabled at (7508896): [<c01294bd>] __do_softirq+0xee/0xfd
[ 1986.897222] softirqs last disabled at (7508859): [<c01030ed>] do_softirq+0x50/0x9d
[ 1986.897234]
[ 1986.897235] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1986.897242]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1986.897244]
[ 1986.897250]        CPU0
[ 1986.897254]        ----
[ 1986.897257]   lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
[ 1986.897265] <Interrupt>
[ 1986.897269]     lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
[ 1986.897276]
[ 1986.897277]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1986.897278]
[ 1986.897286] no locks held by kswapd0/16.
[ 1986.897291]
[ 1986.897292] stack backtrace:
[ 1986.897299] Pid: 16, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.1-main #8
[ 1986.897306] Call Trace:
[ 1986.897314]  [<c0439e76>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
[ 1986.897324]  [<c01482d1>] print_usage_bug+0x20e/0x21a
[ 1986.897332]  [<c01479b8>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug+0x172/0x172
[ 1986.897341]  [<c014855c>] mark_lock+0x27f/0x483
[ 1986.897349]  [<c0148d88>] __lock_acquire+0x628/0x1472
[ 1986.897358]  [<c0149fae>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e
[ 1986.897366]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
[ 1986.897384]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
[ 1986.897397]  [<c043b5ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x35/0x26f
[ 1986.897409]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
[ 1986.897421]  [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
[ 1986.897433]  [<c01e2edd>] map_block_for_writepage+0xc9/0x590
[ 1986.897448]  [<c01b1706>] ? create_empty_buffers+0x33/0x8f
[ 1986.897461]  [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
[ 1986.897472]  [<c043ef7f>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x81/0x8e
[ 1986.897485]  [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
[ 1986.897496]  [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
[ 1986.897508]  [<c01e355d>] reiserfs_writepage+0x1b9/0x3e7
[ 1986.897521]  [<c0173b40>] ? clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xcb/0xde
[ 1986.897533]  [<c014a6e3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x108/0x138
[ 1986.897546]  [<c014a71e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
[ 1986.897559]  [<c0177b38>] shrink_page_list+0x34f/0x5e2
[ 1986.897572]  [<c01780a7>] shrink_inactive_list+0x172/0x22c
[ 1986.897585]  [<c0178464>] shrink_zone+0x303/0x3b1
[ 1986.897597]  [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
[ 1986.897611]  [<c01788c9>] kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2

The deadlock shouldn't happen since we are doing that allocation in the
mount path, the filesystem is not available for any reclaim.  Still the
warning is annoying.

To solve this, acquire the lock later only where we need it, right before
calling reiserfs_read_locked_inode() that wants to lock to walk the tree.

Reported-by: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
reiserfs: don't lock journal_init() 2012-01-11T00:30:53+00:00 Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@gmail.com 2012-01-10T23:11:09+00:00 37c69b98d0dca54d9eb72226bbf2e211aaaf126e journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem is involved there. journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there. Just keep the it around these two calls for safety. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 
journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem
is involved there.  journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be
reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there.  Just keep the
it around these two calls for safety.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>