Commit 28c2103 added new state ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, so the device power
states array must be expanded by one also.

v2: Use ACPI_D_STATE_COUNT instead of number 5 for the array size.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Oldřich Jedlička <oldium.pro@seznam.cz>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

After redefining CONFIG_PM to depend on (CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ||
CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) the CONFIG_PM_OPS option is redundant and can be
replaced with CONFIG_PM.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
generating wakeup signals more than once in a row.  However, it
really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
threads for the same device.

Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is
only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is
present for the given device.  That information is only used by
acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call
acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped
if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags().
Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0,
so it really should be void.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be
dropped.  Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies
the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating
the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is
wrong.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power() for manipulating power
resources used by ACPI fan devices, which allows them to be put into
the right state during initialization and resume.  Consequently,
remove the flags.force_power_state field from struct acpi_device,
which is not necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Add function acpi_bus_update_power() for reading the actual power
state of an ACPI device and updating its device->power.state field
in such a way that its power resources' reference counters will
remain consistent with that field.

For this purpose introduce __acpi_bus_set_power() setting the
power state of an ACPI device without updating its
device->power.state field and make acpi_bus_set_power() and
acpi_bus_update_power() use it (acpi_bus_set_power() retains the
current behavior for now).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Drop special ACPI wakeup flags, wakeup.state.enabled and
wakeup.flags.always_enabled, that aren't necessary any more after
we've started to use standard device wakeup flags for handling ACPI
wakeup devices.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>