acpi_dev_run_wake() is a generic function which can be used by
other subsystem too. Rename it to acpi_pm_device_run_wake, to be
consistent with acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake.

Then move it to ACPI core.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Devices may share same list of power resources in _PR0, for example

Device(Dev0)
{
	Name (_PR0, Package (0x01)
	{
		P0PR,
		P1PR
	})
}

Device(Dev1)
{
	Name (_PR0, Package (0x01)
	{
		P0PR,
		P1PR
	}
}

Assume Dev0 and Dev1 were runtime suspended.
Then Dev0 is resumed first and it goes into D0 state.
But Dev1 is left in D0_Uninitialised state.

This is wrong. In this case, Dev1 must be resumed too.

In order to hand this case, each power resource maintains a list of
devices which relies on it.

When power resource is ON, it will check if the devices on its list
can be resumed. The device can only be resumed when all the power
resouces of its _PR0 are ON.

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Commit 28c2103 added new state ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, so the device power
states array must be expanded by one also.

v2: Use ACPI_D_STATE_COUNT instead of number 5 for the array size.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Oldřich Jedlička <oldium.pro@seznam.cz>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

After redefining CONFIG_PM to depend on (CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ||
CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) the CONFIG_PM_OPS option is redundant and can be
replaced with CONFIG_PM.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
generating wakeup signals more than once in a row.  However, it
really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
threads for the same device.

Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is
only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is
present for the given device.  That information is only used by
acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call
acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped
if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags().
Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0,
so it really should be void.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be
dropped.  Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies
the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating
the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is
wrong.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power() for manipulating power
resources used by ACPI fan devices, which allows them to be put into
the right state during initialization and resume.  Consequently,
remove the flags.force_power_state field from struct acpi_device,
which is not necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>