* acpi-pm:
  PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
  PCI / PM: Simplify device wakeup settings code
  PCI / PM: Drop pme_interrupt flag from struct pci_dev
  ACPI / PM: Consolidate device wakeup settings code
  ACPI / PM: Drop run_wake from struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags
  ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems
  platform: x86: intel-hid: Wake up the system from suspend-to-idle
  platform: x86: intel-vbtn: Wake up the system from suspend-to-idle
  ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle
  platform/x86: Add driver for ACPI INT0002 Virtual GPIO device
  PCI / PM: Restore PME Enable if skipping wakeup setup
  PM / sleep: Print timing information if debug is enabled
  ACPI / PM: Clean up device wakeup enable/disable code
  ACPI / PM: Change log level of wakeup-related message
  USB / PCI / PM: Allow the PCI core to do the resume cleanup
  ACPI / PM: Run wakeup notify handlers synchronously

Conflicts:
	drivers/base/power/main.c

Merge 'uuid-types' from git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/uuid.git

The pme_interrupt flag in struct pci_dev is set when PMEs generated
by the device are going to be signaled via root port PME interrupts.

Ironically enough, that information is only used by the code setting
up device wakeup through ACPI which returns as soon as it sees the
pme_interrupt flag set while setting up "remote runtime wakeup".
That is questionable, however, because in theory there may be PCIe
devices using out-of-band PME signaling under root ports handled
by the native PME code or devices requiring wakeup power setup to be
carried out by AML.  For such devices, ACPI wakeup should be invoked
regardless of whether or not native PME signaling is used in general.

For this reason, drop the pme_interrupt flag and rework the code
using it which then allows the ACPI-based device wakeup handling
in PCI to be consolidated to use one code path for both "runtime
remote wakeup" and system wakeup (from sleep states).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Currently, there are two separate ways of handling device wakeup
settings in the ACPI core, depending on whether this is runtime
wakeup or system wakeup (from sleep states).  However, after the
previous commit eliminating the run_wake ACPI device wakeup flag,
there is no difference between the two any more at the ACPI level,
so they can be combined.

For this reason, introduce acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() to replace both
acpi_pm_device_run_wake() and acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() and make it
check the ACPI device object's wakeup.valid flag to determine whether
or not the device can be set up to generate wakeup signals.

Also notice that zpodd_enable/disable_run_wake() only call
device_set_run_wake() because acpi_pm_device_run_wake() called
device_run_wake(), which is not done by acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup(),
so drop the now redundant device_set_run_wake() calls from there.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The run_wake flag in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags stores the
information on whether or not the device can generate wakeup
signals at run time, but in ACPI that really is equivalent to
being able to generate wakeup signals at all.

In fact, run_wake will always be set after successful executeion of
acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake(), but if that fails, the device will not be
able to use a wakeup GPE at all, so it won't be able to wake up the
systems from sleep states too.  Hence, run_wake actually means that
the device is capable of triggering wakeup and so it is equivalent
to the valid flag.

For this reason, drop run_wake from struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags
and make sure that the valid flag is only set if
acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() has been successful.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Merge branch 'uuid-types' from git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/uuid.git
to satisfy dependencies.

Commit f406270bf73d ("ACPI / scan: Set the visited flag for all
enumerated devices") caused that two group of special SPI or I2C
devices do not enumerate. SPI and I2C devices are expected to be
enumerated by the SPI and I2C subsystems but change caused that
acpi_bus_attach() marks those devices with acpi_device_set_enumerated().

First group of devices are matched using Device Tree compatible property
with special _HID "PRP0001". Those devices have matched scan handler,
acpi_scan_attach_handler() retuns 1 and acpi_bus_attach() marks them
with acpi_device_set_enumerated().

Second group of devices without valid _HID such as "LNXVIDEO" have
device->pnp.type.platform_id set to zero and change again marks them
with acpi_device_set_enumerated().

Fix this by flagging the SPI and I2C devices during struct acpi_device
object initialization time and let the code in acpi_bus_attach() to go
through the device_attach() and acpi_default_enumeration() path for all
SPI and I2C devices.

Fixes: f406270bf73d (ACPI / scan: Set the visited flag for all enumerated devices)
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ
during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events
signaled through it wake up the system from that state.  However,
on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while
suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up.  In fact,
quite often they should just be discarded.

Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in
order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume
and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point
when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after
executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path.

For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the
platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines
like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be
used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops.

In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI
has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced
system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually
processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should
resume.  In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event
queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due
to race conditions.

In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs
to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that
it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup
events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from
suspending is not enabled.  However, to preserve the existing
behavior with respect to suspend-to-RAM, this only is done in
the suspend-to-idle case and only if an SCI has occurred while
suspended.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The work functions provided by the users of acpi_add_pm_notifier()
should be run synchronously before re-enabling the wakeup GPE in
case they are used to clear the status and/or disable the wakeup
signaling at the source.  Otherwise, which is the case currently in
the PCI bus type code, the same wakeup event may be signaled for
multiple times while the execution of the work function in response
to it has already been queued up.

Fortunately, acpi_add_pm_notifier() is only used by PCI and by
ACPI device PM code internally, so the change is relatively
straightforward to make.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

acpi_evaluate_dsm() and friends take a pointer to a raw buffer of 16
bytes. Instead we convert them to use guid_t type. At the same time we
convert current users.

acpi_str_to_uuid() becomes useless after the conversion and it's safe to
get rid of it.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>