linux-toradex.git/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h, branch v4.17-rc1 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff 2017-12-07T21:52:01+00:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org 2017-12-05T05:32:46+00:00 84fe2cab48590e4373978e4ef2031c977de98995 No one has used it for the last two and half years (since it was introduced by commit c36cf0717631 (thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API), get rid of it. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
No one has used it for the last two and half years (since it was
introduced by commit c36cf0717631 (thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the
power cooling device API), get rid of it.

Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helper 2017-12-07T21:52:01+00:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org 2017-12-05T05:32:45+00:00 3ebb62ffc4e4817c3288cdf7ed67ccaf453385e3 of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be removed, but then we would be left with two routines: cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that would look odd. Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be
removed, but then we would be left with two routines:
cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that
would look odd.

Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and
rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as
of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff.

Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpu_cooling: Remove unused cpufreq_power_cooling_register() 2017-12-07T21:52:01+00:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org 2017-12-05T05:32:44+00:00 ba0966da208ef0793486502a0e6b929fbd6d4223 It isn't used by anyone, drop it. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
It isn't used by anyone, drop it.

Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpu_cooling: Make of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() parse DT 2017-12-07T21:52:01+00:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org 2017-12-05T05:32:43+00:00 f5f263fed66f75a4482d7ad49392b4283a05885a All the callers of of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() have almost identical code and it makes more sense to move that code into the helper as its all about reading DT properties. This got rid of lot of redundant code. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 
All the callers of of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() have almost
identical code and it makes more sense to move that code into the helper
as its all about reading DT properties.

This got rid of lot of redundant code.

Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device 2017-05-28T00:32:24+00:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org 2017-04-25T10:27:14+00:00 4d753aa7b6279e4b7d338947a434689962f430d1 The CPU cooling driver uses the cpufreq policy, to get clip_cpus, the frequency table, etc. Most of the callers of CPU cooling driver's registration routines have the cpufreq policy with them, but they only pass the policy->related_cpus cpumask. The __cpufreq_cooling_register() routine then gets the policy by itself and uses it. It would be much better if the callers can pass the policy instead directly. This also fixes a basic design flaw, where the policy can be freed while the CPU cooling driver is still active. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> 
The CPU cooling driver uses the cpufreq policy, to get clip_cpus, the
frequency table, etc. Most of the callers of CPU cooling driver's
registration routines have the cpufreq policy with them, but they only
pass the policy->related_cpus cpumask. The __cpufreq_cooling_register()
routine then gets the policy by itself and uses it.

It would be much better if the callers can pass the policy instead
directly. This also fixes a basic design flaw, where the policy can be
freed while the CPU cooling driver is still active.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level() 2017-05-28T00:32:04+00:00 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org 2017-04-25T10:27:12+00:00 3e08b2df12983159ea2d9a1aa2b2bc601093b3cb There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already has pointer to the cpufreq_cdev structure. It can directly call get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpufreq_cooling_get_level(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> 
There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already
has pointer to the cpufreq_cdev structure. It can directly call
get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpufreq_cooling_get_level().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API 2015-05-05T04:27:52+00:00 Javi Merino javi.merino@arm.com 2015-02-26T19:00:29+00:00 c36cf07176316fbe6a4bdbc23afcb0cbf7822bf2 Add a basic power model to the cpu cooling device to implement the power cooling device API. The power model uses the current frequency, current load and OPPs for the power calculations. The cpus must have registered their OPPs using the OPP library. Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> 
Add a basic power model to the cpu cooling device to implement the
power cooling device API.  The power model uses the current frequency,
current load and OPPs for the power calculations.  The cpus must have
registered their OPPs using the OPP library.

Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
thermal: cpu_cooling: return ERR_PTR() for !CPU_THERMAL or !THERMAL_OF 2014-12-17T13:00:04+00:00 Javi Merino javi.merino@arm.com 2014-12-17T11:11:24+00:00 503ccc3fec4a56cdcfedc507cd1ea0d85e1fbfa2 The documentation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and cpufreq_cooling_register() say that they return ERR_PTR() on error. Accordingly, callers only check for IS_ERR(). Therefore, make them return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS) as is customary in the kernel when config options are missing. Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> 
The documentation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and
cpufreq_cooling_register() say that they return ERR_PTR() on error.
Accordingly, callers only check for IS_ERR().  Therefore, make them
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS) as is customary in the kernel when config
options are missing.

Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
thermal: cpu_cooling: introduce of_cpufreq_cooling_register 2013-12-04T13:33:34+00:00 Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valentin@ti.com 2013-09-12T23:26:45+00:00 39d99cff76bf2992fd6dd4b1fc62da139e62e90c This patch introduces an API to register cpufreq cooling device based on device tree node. The registration via device tree node differs from normal registration due to the fact that it is needed to fill the device_node structure in order to be able to match the cooling devices with trip points. Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com> 
This patch introduces an API to register cpufreq cooling device
based on device tree node.

The registration via device tree node differs from normal
registration due to the fact that it is needed to fill
the device_node structure in order to be able to match
the cooling devices with trip points.

Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
thermal: cpu_cooling: fix stub function 2013-07-08T14:13:40+00:00 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de 2013-07-05T15:40:13+00:00 e8d39240d635ed9bcaddbec898b1c9f063c5dbb2 The function stub for cpufreq_cooling_get_level introduced in 57df81069 "Thermal: exynos: fix cooling state translation" is not syntactically correct C and needs to be fixed to avoid this error: In file included from drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c:20:0: include/linux/cpu_cooling.h: In function 'cpufreq_cooling_get_level': include/linux/cpu_cooling.h:57:1: error: parameter name omitted unsigned long cpufreq_cooling_get_level(unsigned int, unsigned int) ^ include/linux/cpu_cooling.h:57:1: error: parameter name omitted Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Amit Daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com> 
The function stub for cpufreq_cooling_get_level introduced
in 57df81069 "Thermal: exynos: fix cooling state translation"
is not syntactically correct C and needs to be fixed to avoid
this error:

In file included from drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c:20:0:
 include/linux/cpu_cooling.h: In function 'cpufreq_cooling_get_level':
include/linux/cpu_cooling.h:57:1:
 error: parameter name omitted  unsigned long cpufreq_cooling_get_level(unsigned int, unsigned int)  ^
 include/linux/cpu_cooling.h:57:1: error: parameter name omitted

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>