Dentries that represent no-key names must have a dentry_operations that
includes fscrypt_d_revalidate().  Currently, this is handled by
fscrypt_prepare_lookup() installing fscrypt_d_ops.

However, ceph support for encryption
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914191707.380444-1-jlayton@kernel.org)
can't use fscrypt_d_ops, since ceph already has its own
dentry_operations.

Similarly, ext4 and f2fs support for directories that are both encrypted
and casefolded
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200923010151.69506-1-drosen@google.com)
can't use fscrypt_d_ops either, since casefolding requires some dentry
operations too.

To satisfy both users, we need to move the responsibility of installing
the dentry_operations to filesystems.

In preparation for this, export fscrypt_d_revalidate() and give it a
!CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION stub.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924054721.187797-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Originally we used the term "encrypted name" or "ciphertext name" to
mean the encoded filename that is shown when an encrypted directory is
listed without its key.  But these terms are ambiguous since they also
mean the filename stored on-disk.  "Encrypted name" is especially
ambiguous since it could also be understood to mean "this filename is
encrypted on-disk", similar to "encrypted file".

So we've started calling these encoded names "no-key names" instead.

Therefore, rename DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME to DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME to avoid
confusion about what this flag means.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924042624.98439-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Currently we're using the term "ciphertext name" ambiguously because it
can mean either the actual ciphertext filename, or the encoded filename
that is shown when an encrypted directory is listed without its key.
The latter we're now usually calling the "no-key name"; and while it's
derived from the ciphertext name, it's not the same thing.

To avoid this ambiguity, rename fscrypt_name::is_ciphertext_name to
fscrypt_name::is_nokey_name, and update comments that say "ciphertext
name" (or "encrypted name") to say "no-key name" instead when warranted.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924042624.98439-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() requires that the optional argument
to the test_dummy_encryption mount option be specified as a substring_t.
That doesn't work well with filesystems that use the new mount API,
since the new way of parsing mount options doesn't use substring_t.

Make it take the argument as a 'const char *' instead.

Instead of moving the match_strdup() into the callers in ext4 and f2fs,
make them just use arg->from directly.  Since the pattern is
"test_dummy_encryption=%s", the argument will be null-terminated.

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-14-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

The behavior of the test_dummy_encryption mount option is that when a
new file (or directory or symlink) is created in an unencrypted
directory, it's automatically encrypted using a dummy encryption policy.
That's it; in particular, the encryption (or lack thereof) of existing
files (or directories or symlinks) doesn't change.

Unfortunately the implementation of test_dummy_encryption is a bit weird
and confusing.  When test_dummy_encryption is enabled and a file is
being created in an unencrypted directory, we set up an encryption key
(->i_crypt_info) for the directory.  This isn't actually used to do any
encryption, however, since the directory is still unencrypted!  Instead,
->i_crypt_info is only used for inheriting the encryption policy.

One consequence of this is that the filesystem ends up providing a
"dummy context" (policy + nonce) instead of a "dummy policy".  In
commit ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2"), I
mistakenly thought this was required.  However, actually the nonce only
ends up being used to derive a key that is never used.

Another consequence of this implementation is that it allows for
'inode->i_crypt_info != NULL && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)', which is an edge
case that can be forgotten about.  For example, currently
FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY on an unencrypted directory may return the
dummy encryption policy when the filesystem is mounted with
test_dummy_encryption.  That seems like the wrong thing to do, since
again, the directory itself is not actually encrypted.

Therefore, switch to a more logical and maintainable implementation
where the dummy encryption policy inheritance is done without setting up
keys for unencrypted directories.  This involves:

- Adding a function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() which returns the
  encryption policy to inherit from a directory.  This can be a real
  policy, a dummy policy, or no policy.

- Replacing struct fscrypt_dummy_context, ->get_dummy_context(), etc.
  with struct fscrypt_dummy_policy, ->get_dummy_policy(), etc.

- Making fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() take an fscrypt_policy instead
  of an inode.

Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-13-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

In preparation for moving the logic for "get the encryption policy
inherited by new files in this directory" to a single place, make
fscrypt_prepare_symlink() a regular function rather than an inline
function that wraps __fscrypt_prepare_symlink().

This way, the new function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() won't need to be
exported to filesystems.

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-12-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Now that all filesystems have been converted to use
fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context(),
fscrypt_inherit_context() is no longer used.  Remove it.

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

fscrypt_get_encryption_info() is intended to be GFP_NOFS-safe.  But
actually it isn't, since it uses functions like crypto_alloc_skcipher()
which aren't GFP_NOFS-safe, even when called under memalloc_nofs_save().
Therefore it can deadlock when called from a context that needs
GFP_NOFS, e.g. during an ext4 transaction or between f2fs_lock_op() and
f2fs_unlock_op().  This happens when creating a new encrypted file.

We can't fix this by just not setting up the key for new inodes right
away, since new symlinks need their key to encrypt the symlink target.

So we need to set up the new inode's key before starting the
transaction.  But just calling fscrypt_get_encryption_info() earlier
doesn't work, since it assumes the encryption context is already set,
and the encryption context can't be set until the transaction.

The recently proposed fscrypt support for the ceph filesystem
(https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20200821182813.52570-1-jlayton@kernel.org/T/#u)
will have this same ordering problem too, since ceph will need to
encrypt new symlinks before setting their encryption context.

Finally, f2fs can deadlock when the filesystem is mounted with
'-o test_dummy_encryption' and a new file is created in an existing
unencrypted directory.  Similarly, this is caused by holding too many
locks when calling fscrypt_get_encryption_info().

To solve all these problems, add new helper functions:

- fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() sets up a new inode's encryption key
  (fscrypt_info), using the parent directory's encryption policy and a
  new random nonce.  It neither reads nor writes the encryption context.

- fscrypt_set_context() persists the encryption context of a new inode,
  using the information from the fscrypt_info already in memory.  This
  replaces fscrypt_inherit_context().

Temporarily keep fscrypt_inherit_context() around until all filesystems
have been converted to use fscrypt_set_context().

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200810142139.487631-1-jlayton@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire().  Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE().  However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself.  This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.

fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are
allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto.  So by
using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal
implementation details of these other kernel subsystems.

Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.

(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here.  This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)

Fixes: e37a784d8b6a ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>