To keep naming consistent we should stick with *iotlb*. This patch
renames a few remaining functions.

Signed-off-by: Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817210051.13546-1-murphyt7@tcd.ie
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

Now the ARM page tables are always allocated by GFP_ATOMIC parameter,
but the iommu_ops->map() function has been added a gfp_t parameter by
commit 781ca2de89ba ("iommu: Add gfp parameter to iommu_ops::map"),
thus io_pgtable_ops->map() should use the gfp parameter passed from
iommu_ops->map() to allocate page pages, which can avoid wasting the
memory allocators atomic pools for some non-atomic contexts.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3093df4cb95497aaf713fca623ce4ecebb197c2e.1591930156.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

Now that we can correctly extract top-level indices without relying on
the remaining upper bits being zero, the only remaining impediments to
using a given table for TTBR1 are the address validation on map/unmap
and the awkward TCR translation granule format. Add a quirk so that we
can do the right thing at those points.

Tested-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Commit 05a648cd2dd7 ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Rationalise TCR handling")
reworked the way in which the TCR register value is returned from the
io-pgtable code when targetting the Arm long-descriptor format, in
preparation for allowing page-tables to target TTBR1.

As it turns out, the new interface is a lot nicer to use, so do the same
conversion for the VTCR register even though there is only a single base
register for stage-2 translation.

Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Although it's conceptually nice for the io_pgtable_cfg to provide a
standard VMSA TCR value, the reality is that no VMSA-compliant IOMMU
looks exactly like an Arm CPU, and they all have various other TCR
controls which io-pgtable can't be expected to understand. Thus since
there is an expectation that drivers will have to add to the given TCR
value anyway, let's strip it down to just the essentials that are
directly relevant to io-pgtable's inner workings - namely the various
sizes and the walk attributes.

Tested-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
[will: Add missing include of bitfield.h]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

TTBR1 values have so far been redundant since no users implement any
support for split address spaces. Crucially, though, one of the main
reasons for wanting to do so is to be able to manage each half entirely
independently, e.g. context-switching one set of mappings without
disturbing the other. Thus it seems unlikely that tying two tables
together in a single io_pgtable_cfg would ever be particularly desirable
or useful.

Streamline the configs to just a single conceptual TTBR value
representing the allocated table. This paves the way for future users to
support split address spaces by simply allocating a table and dealing
with the detailed TTBRn logistics themselves.

Tested-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
[will: Drop change to ttbr value]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Between VMSAv8-64 and the various 32-bit formats, there is either one
64-bit MAIR or a pair of 32-bit MAIR0/MAIR1 or NMRR/PMRR registers.
As such, keeping two 64-bit values in io_pgtable_cfg has always been
overkill.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

MediaTek extend the arm v7s descriptor to support up to 34 bits PA where
the bit32 and bit33 are encoded in the bit9 and bit4 of the PTE
respectively. Meanwhile the iova still is 32bits.

Regarding whether the pagetable address could be over 4GB, the mt8183
support it while the previous mt8173 don't, thus keep it as is.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

In previous mt2712/mt8173, MediaTek extend the v7s to support 4GB dram.
But in the latest mt8183, We extend it to support the PA up to 34bit.
Then the "MTK_4GB" name is not so fit, This patch only change the quirk
name to "MTK_EXT".

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>