Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

An interrupt that is disabled/masked but set for wakeup may still need to
be able to wake up the system from sleep states like "suspend to RAM".

To that effect, introduce the IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND flag.
If the irqchip have this flag set, the irq PM code will enable/unmask
the irqs that are marked for wakeup, but that are in a disabled state.

On resume, such irqs will be restored back to their disabled state.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
[maz: commit message fix-up]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601267524-20199-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

In order to avoid compilation errors when a driver references set_handle_irq(),
but that the architecture doesn't select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
add a stub function that will just WARN_ON_ONCE() if ever used.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
[maz: commit message]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924071754.4509-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com

A number of architectures implement IPI statistics directly,
duplicating the core kstat_irqs accounting. As we move IPIs to
being actual IRQs, we would end-up with a confusing display
in /proc/interrupts (where the IPIs would appear twice).

In order to solve this, allow interrupts to be flagged as
"hidden", which excludes them from /proc/interrupts.

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

For irqchips using the fasteoi flow, IPIs are a bit special.
They need to be EOI'd early (before calling the handler), as
funny things may happen in the handler (they do not necessarily
behave like a normal interrupt).

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

John reported that on a RK3288 system the perf per CPU interrupts are all
affine to CPU0 and provided the analysis:

 "It looks like what happens is that because the interrupts are not per-CPU
  in the hardware, armpmu_request_irq() calls irq_force_affinity() while
  the interrupt is deactivated and then request_irq() with IRQF_PERCPU |
  IRQF_NOBALANCING.  

  Now when irq_startup() runs with IRQ_STARTUP_NORMAL, it calls
  irq_setup_affinity() which returns early because IRQF_PERCPU and
  IRQF_NOBALANCING are set, leaving the interrupt on its original CPU."

This was broken by the recent commit which blocked interrupt affinity
setting in hardware before activation of the interrupt. While this works in
general, it does not work for this particular case. As contrary to the
initial analysis not all interrupt chip drivers implement an activate
callback, the safe cure is to make the deferred interrupt affinity setting
at activation time opt-in.

Implement the necessary core logic and make the two irqchip implementations
for which this is required opt-in. In hindsight this would have been the
right thing to do, but ...

Fixes: baedb87d1b53 ("genirq/affinity: Handle affinity setting on inactive interrupts correctly")
Reported-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87blk4tzgm.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de

Pull irq fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A set of fixes/updates for the interrupt subsystem:

   - Remove setup_irq() and remove_irq(). All users have been converted
     so remove them before new users surface.

   - A set of bugfixes for various interrupt chip drivers

   - Add a few missing static attributes to address sparse warnings"

* tag 'irq-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Make bcm7038_l1_of_init() static
  irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: Make legacy_bindings static
  irqchip/meson-gpio: Fix HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order
  irqchip/sifive-plic: Fix maximum priority threshold value
  irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Fix processing of masked irqs
  irqchip/mbigen: Free msi_desc on device teardown
  irqchip/gic-v4.1: Update effective affinity of virtual SGIs
  irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add support for VPENDBASER's Dirty+Valid signaling
  genirq: Remove setup_irq() and remove_irq()

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

Now that all the users of setup_irq() & remove_irq() have been replaced by
request_irq() & free_irq() respectively, delete them.

Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0aa8771ada1ac8e1312f6882980c9c08bd023148.1585320721.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com