The MTD headers traditionally use stdint types rather than
the kernel integer types. This converts them to do the
same as all the others.

Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Once upon a time, the MTD repository was using CVS.

This patch therefore removes all usages of the no longer updated CVS
keywords from the MTD code.

This also includes code that printed them to the user.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Add LZO1X compression/decompression support to jffs2.

LZO's interface doesn't entirely match that required by jffs2 so a
buffer and memcpy is unavoidable.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@openedhand.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>

- When xdatum is removed, a new xdatum with 'delete marker' is
  written. (version==0xffffffff means 'delete marker')
- When xref is removed, a new xref with 'delete marker' is written.
  (odd-numbered xseqno means 'delete marker')

- delete_xattr_(datum/xref)_delay() are new deletion functions
  are added. We can only use them if we can detect the target
  obsolete xdatum/xref as a orphan or errir one.
  (e.g when inode deletion, or detecting crc error)

[1/3] jffs2-xattr-v6-01-delete_marker.patch

Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Device node major/minor numbers are just stored in the payload of a single
data node. Just extend that to 4 bytes and use new_encode_dev() for it.

We only use the 4-byte format if we _need_ to, if !old_valid_dev(foo).
This preserves backwards compatibility with older code as much as
possible. If we do make devices with major or minor numbers above 255, and
then mount the file system with the old code, it'll just read the first
two bytes and get the numbers wrong. If it comes to garbage-collect it,
it'll then write back those wrong numbers. But that's about the best we
can expect.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

We have to pack at least the jint16_t structure, because otherwise it'll
be four bytes in size. Thankfully, we can do that and _not_ pack the
actual node structures, and the compiler still doesn't emit stupid code.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

If we use __attribute__((packed)), GCC will _also_ assume that the
structures aren't sensibly aligned, and it'll emit code to cope with
that instead of straight word load/save. This can be _very_ suboptimal
on architectures like ARM.

Ideally, we want an attribute which just tells GCC not to do any
padding, without the alignment side-effects. In the absense of that,
we'll just drop the 'packed' attribute and hope that everything stays as
it was (which to be fair is fairly much what we expect). And add some
paranoia checks in the initialisation code, which should be optimised
away completely in the normal case.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>