During regulators registration, if .of_match and .regulators_node are
defined as non-null strings in struct regulator_desc the core searches the
DT subtree rooted at .regulators_node trying to match, at first, .of_match
against the 'regulator-compatible' property and, then, falling back to use
the name of the node itself to determine a good match.

Property 'regulator-compatible', though, is now deprecated and falling back
to match against the node name, works fine only as long as the involved
nodes are named in an unique way across the searched subtree; if that's not
the case, like when using <common-name>@<unit> style naming for properties
indexed via 'reg' property (as advised by the standard), the above matching
mechanism based on the simple common name will lead to multiple matches and
the only viable alternative would be to properly define the now deprecated
'regulator-compatible' as the node full name, i.e. <common-name>@<unit>.

In order to address this case without using such deprecated binding, define
a new boolean flag .of_match_full_name in struct regulator_desc to force
the core to match against the node full-name instead of the plain name.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191051.46363-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

regulator_lock/unlock() was used only to guard
regulator_notifier_call_chain(). As no users remain, make the functions
internal.

Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d3381aabd2632aff5e7b839d55868bec6e85c811.1600550732.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Silence documentation build warning by correcting kernel-doc comments.

./include/linux/regulator/machine.h:196: warning: Function parameter or member 'max_uV_step' not described in 'regulation_constraints'
./include/linux/regulator/driver.h:206: warning: Function parameter or member 'resume' not described in 'regulator_ops'

Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200715191438.29312-1-colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators might need to verify that they have indeed been enabled
after the enable() call is made and enable_time delay has passed.

This is implemented by repeatedly checking is_enabled() upto
poll_enabled_time, waiting for the already calculated enable delay in
each iteration.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622124110.20971-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Change the regulator helpers to use common linear_ranges code.

Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Acked-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/64f01d5e381b8631a271616b7790f9d5640974fb.1588944082.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The toolchain produces a warning on this driver when building
the docs:

	./include/linux/regulator/driver.h:284: WARNING: Unknown target name: "regulator_regmap_x_voltage".

While fixing it, we notices that there's no function names
with the above pattern. It seems that some previous patch
renamed it to regulator_map_* instead.

So, change the function name, replacing "x" by "*", with is
a more used way to add a wildcard, and escape those with
``literal`` markup, in order to avoid the toolchain to think
that this is a link to some existing document chapter.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9f5687bcf981a88c9d1fd04d759a540fda53a99.1584456635.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators require that the requested voltage be reached gradually
by setting all or some of the intermediate values. Implement a new field
in the regulator description struct that allows users to specify the
number of selectors by which the regulator API should step when ramping
the voltage up/down.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703161035.31808-2-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Right now regulator core supports only one type of regulators coupling,
the "voltage max-spread" which keeps voltages of coupled regulators in a
given range from each other. A more sophisticated coupling may be required
in practice, one example is the NVIDIA Tegra SoCs which besides the
max-spreading have other restrictions that must be adhered. Introduce API
that allow platforms to provide their own customized coupling algorithms.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>