smp_call_function_single() needs to be visible in non-SMP builds, to fix:

arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c:283: warning: implicit declaration of function 'smp_call_function_single'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

If we're going to implement smp_call_function_single() on three architecture
with the same prototype then it should have a declaration in a
non-arch-specific header file.

Move it into <linux/smp.h>.

Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Presently, smp_processor_id() isn't necessarily set up until setup_arch().
But it's used in boot_cpu_init() and printk() and perhaps in other places,
prior to setup_arch() being called.

So provide a new smp_setup_processor_id() which is called before anything
else, wire it up for Voyager (which boots on a CPU other than #0, and broke).

Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

net/core/flow.c: In function 'flow_cache_flush':
net/core/flow.c:299: warning: statement with no effect

Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

When on_each_cpu() runs the callback on other CPUs, it runs with local
interrupts disabled.  So we should run the function with local interrupts
disabled on this CPU, too.

And do the same for UP, so the callback is run in the same environment on both
UP and SMP.  (strictly it should do preempt_disable() too, but I think
local_irq_disable is sufficiently equivalent).

Also uninlines on_each_cpu().  softirq.c was the most appropriate file I could
find, but it doesn't seem to justify creating a new file.

Oh, and fix up that comment over (under?) x86's smp_call_function().  It
drives me nuts.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

A bunch of asm/bug.h includes are both not needed (since it will get
pulled anyway) and bogus (since they are done too early).  Removed.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

This reverts commit af2b4079ab154bd12e8c12b02db5f31b31babe63

Changing the #define to an inline function breaks on non-SMP builds,
since wuite a few places in the kernel do not implement the ipi handler
when compiling for UP.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Not really a network problem, more a !SMP issue.

net/core/flow.c:295: warning: statement with no effect

flow.c:295:        smp_call_function(flow_cache_flush_per_cpu, &info, 1, 0);

Fix this by converting the macro to an inline function, which
also increases the typechecking for !SMP builds.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It may shut up gcc, but it also incorrectly changes the semantics of the
smp_call_function() helpers.

You can fix the warning other ways if you are interested (create another
inline function that takes no arguments and returns zero), but
preferably gcc just shouldn't complain about unused return values from
statement expressions in the first place.