linux-toradex.git/include/linux/swap.h, branch v3.14.46

mm: non-atomically mark page accessed during page cache allocation where possible

2015-01-30T01:40:52+00:00

commit 2457aec63745e235bcafb7ef312b182d8682f0fc upstream.

aops->write_begin may allocate a new page and make it visible only to have
mark_page_accessed called almost immediately after.  Once the page is
visible the atomic operations are necessary which is noticable overhead
when writing to an in-memory filesystem like tmpfs but should also be
noticable with fast storage.  The objective of the patch is to initialse
the accessed information with non-atomic operations before the page is
visible.

The bulk of filesystems directly or indirectly use
grab_cache_page_write_begin or find_or_create_page for the initial
allocation of a page cache page.  This patch adds an init_page_accessed()
helper which behaves like the first call to mark_page_accessed() but may
called before the page is visible and can be done non-atomically.

The primary APIs of concern in this care are the following and are used
by most filesystems.

	find_get_page
	find_lock_page
	find_or_create_page
	grab_cache_page_nowait
	grab_cache_page_write_begin

All of them are very similar in detail to the patch creates a core helper
pagecache_get_page() which takes a flags parameter that affects its
behavior such as whether the page should be marked accessed or not.  Then
old API is preserved but is basically a thin wrapper around this core
function.

Each of the filesystems are then updated to avoid calling
mark_page_accessed when it is known that the VM interfaces have already
done the job.  There is a slight snag in that the timing of the
mark_page_accessed() has now changed so in rare cases it's possible a page
gets to the end of the LRU as PageReferenced where as previously it might
have been repromoted.  This is expected to be rare but it's worth the
filesystem people thinking about it in case they see a problem with the
timing change.  It is also the case that some filesystems may be marking
pages accessed that previously did not but it makes sense that filesystems
have consistent behaviour in this regard.

The test case used to evaulate this is a simple dd of a large file done
multiple times with the file deleted on each iterations.  The size of the
file is 1/10th physical memory to avoid dirty page balancing.  In the
async case it will be possible that the workload completes without even
hitting the disk and will have variable results but highlight the impact
of mark_page_accessed for async IO.  The sync results are expected to be
more stable.  The exception is tmpfs where the normal case is for the "IO"
to not hit the disk.

The test machine was single socket and UMA to avoid any scheduling or NUMA
artifacts.  Throughput and wall times are presented for sync IO, only wall
times are shown for async as the granularity reported by dd and the
variability is unsuitable for comparison.  As async results were variable
do to writback timings, I'm only reporting the maximum figures.  The sync
results were stable enough to make the mean and stddev uninteresting.

The performance results are reported based on a run with no profiling.
Profile data is based on a separate run with oprofile running.

async dd
                                    3.15.0-rc3            3.15.0-rc3
                                       vanilla           accessed-v2
ext3    Max      elapsed     13.9900 (  0.00%)     11.5900 ( 17.16%)
tmpfs	Max      elapsed      0.5100 (  0.00%)      0.4900 (  3.92%)
btrfs   Max      elapsed     12.8100 (  0.00%)     12.7800 (  0.23%)
ext4	Max      elapsed     18.6000 (  0.00%)     13.3400 ( 28.28%)
xfs	Max      elapsed     12.5600 (  0.00%)      2.0900 ( 83.36%)

The XFS figure is a bit strange as it managed to avoid a worst case by
sheer luck but the average figures looked reasonable.

        samples percentage
ext3       86107    0.9783  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
ext3       23833    0.2710  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
ext3        5036    0.0573  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
ext4       64566    0.8961  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
ext4        5322    0.0713  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
ext4        2869    0.0384  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
xfs        62126    1.7675  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
xfs         1904    0.0554  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
xfs          103    0.0030  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
btrfs      10655    0.1338  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
btrfs       2020    0.0273  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
btrfs        587    0.0079  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
tmpfs      59562    3.2628  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
tmpfs       1210    0.0696  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
tmpfs         94    0.0054  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: don't run init_page_accessed() against an uninitialised pointer]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: Oleg Nesterov 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Tested-by: Prabhakar Lad 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: page_alloc: convert hot/cold parameter and immediate callers to bool

2015-01-30T01:40:51+00:00

commit b745bc85f21ea707e4ea1a91948055fa3e72c77b upstream.

cold is a bool, make it one.  Make the likely case the "if" part of the
block instead of the else as according to the optimisation manual this is
preferred.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Acked-by: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: Oleg Nesterov 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/swap.c: clean up lru_cache_add functions

2015-01-30T01:40:51+00:00

commit 2329d3751b082b4fd354f334a88662d72abac52d upstream.

In mm/swap.c, __lru_cache_add() is exported, but actually there are no
users outside this file.

This patch unexports __lru_cache_add(), and makes it static.  It also
exports lru_cache_add_file(), as it is use by cifs and fuse, which can
loaded as modules.

Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan 
Cc: Minchan Kim 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Shaohua Li 
Cc: Bob Liu 
Cc: Seth Jennings 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Rafael Aquini 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Acked-by: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: Khalid Aziz 
Cc: Christoph Hellwig 
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

swap: change swap_list_head to plist, add swap_avail_head

2014-10-09T19:21:28+00:00

commit 18ab4d4ced0817421e6db6940374cc39d28d65da upstream.

Originally get_swap_page() started iterating through the singly-linked
list of swap_info_structs using swap_list.next or highest_priority_index,
which both were intended to point to the highest priority active swap
target that was not full.  The first patch in this series changed the
singly-linked list to a doubly-linked list, and removed the logic to start
at the highest priority non-full entry; it starts scanning at the highest
priority entry each time, even if the entry is full.

Replace the manually ordered swap_list_head with a plist, swap_active_head.
Add a new plist, swap_avail_head.  The original swap_active_head plist
contains all active swap_info_structs, as before, while the new
swap_avail_head plist contains only swap_info_structs that are active and
available, i.e. not full.  Add a new spinlock, swap_avail_lock, to protect
the swap_avail_head list.

Mel Gorman suggested using plists since they internally handle ordering
the list entries based on priority, which is exactly what swap was doing
manually.  All the ordering code is now removed, and swap_info_struct
entries and simply added to their corresponding plist and automatically
ordered correctly.

Using a new plist for available swap_info_structs simplifies and
optimizes get_swap_page(), which no longer has to iterate over full
swap_info_structs.  Using a new spinlock for swap_avail_head plist
allows each swap_info_struct to add or remove themselves from the
plist when they become full or not-full; previously they could not
do so because the swap_info_struct->lock is held when they change
from full<->not-full, and the swap_lock protecting the main
swap_active_head must be ordered before any swap_info_struct->lock.

Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman 
Acked-by: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Shaohua Li 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Dan Streetman 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt 
Cc: Weijie Yang 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Bob Liu 
Cc: Paul Gortmaker 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

swap: change swap_info singly-linked list to list_head

2014-10-09T19:21:27+00:00

commit adfab836f4908deb049a5128082719e689eed964 upstream.

The logic controlling the singly-linked list of swap_info_struct entries
for all active, i.e.  swapon'ed, swap targets is rather complex, because:

 - it stores the entries in priority order
 - there is a pointer to the highest priority entry
 - there is a pointer to the highest priority not-full entry
 - there is a highest_priority_index variable set outside the swap_lock
 - swap entries of equal priority should be used equally

this complexity leads to bugs such as: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/13/181
where different priority swap targets are incorrectly used equally.

That bug probably could be solved with the existing singly-linked lists,
but I think it would only add more complexity to the already difficult to
understand get_swap_page() swap_list iteration logic.

The first patch changes from a singly-linked list to a doubly-linked list
using list_heads; the highest_priority_index and related code are removed
and get_swap_page() starts each iteration at the highest priority
swap_info entry, even if it's full.  While this does introduce unnecessary
list iteration (i.e.  Schlemiel the painter's algorithm) in the case where
one or more of the highest priority entries are full, the iteration and
manipulation code is much simpler and behaves correctly re: the above bug;
and the fourth patch removes the unnecessary iteration.

The second patch adds some minor plist helper functions; nothing new
really, just functions to match existing regular list functions.  These
are used by the next two patches.

The third patch adds plist_requeue(), which is used by get_swap_page() in
the next patch - it performs the requeueing of same-priority entries
(which moves the entry to the end of its priority in the plist), so that
all equal-priority swap_info_structs get used equally.

The fourth patch converts the main list into a plist, and adds a new plist
that contains only swap_info entries that are both active and not full.
As Mel suggested using plists allows removing all the ordering code from
swap - plists handle ordering automatically.  The list naming is also
clarified now that there are two lists, with the original list changed
from swap_list_head to swap_active_head and the new list named
swap_avail_head.  A new spinlock is also added for the new list, so
swap_info entries can be added or removed from the new list immediately as
they become full or not full.

This patch (of 4):

Replace the singly-linked list tracking active, i.e.  swapon'ed,
swap_info_struct entries with a doubly-linked list using struct
list_heads.  Simplify the logic iterating and manipulating the list of
entries, especially get_swap_page(), by using standard list_head
functions, and removing the highest priority iteration logic.

The change fixes the bug:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/13/181
in which different priority swap entries after the highest priority entry
are incorrectly used equally in pairs.  The swap behavior is now as
advertised, i.e. different priority swap entries are used in order, and
equal priority swap targets are used concurrently.

Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman 
Acked-by: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Shaohua Li 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Dan Streetman 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt 
Cc: Weijie Yang 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Bob Liu 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Paul Gortmaker 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: make lru_add_drain_all() selective

2013-09-12T22:38:02+00:00

make lru_add_drain_all() only selectively interrupt the cpus that have
per-cpu free pages that can be drained.

This is important in nohz mode where calling mlockall(), for example,
otherwise will interrupt every core unnecessarily.

This is important on workloads where nohz cores are handling 10 Gb traffic
in userspace.  Those CPUs do not enter the kernel and place pages into LRU
pagevecs and they really, really don't want to be interrupted, or they
drop packets on the floor.

Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf 
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

swap: clean-up #ifdef in page_mapping()

2013-09-11T22:57:31+00:00

PageSwapCache() is always false when !CONFIG_SWAP, so compiler
properly discard related code. Therefore, we don't need #ifdef explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim 
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Minchan Kim 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

swap: make cluster allocation per-cpu

2013-09-11T22:57:17+00:00

swap cluster allocation is to get better request merge to improve
performance.  But the cluster is shared globally, if multiple tasks are
doing swap, this will cause interleave disk access.  While multiple tasks
swap is quite common, for example, each numa node has a kswapd thread
doing swap and multiple threads/processes doing direct page reclaim.

ioscheduler can't help too much here, because tasks don't send swapout IO
down to block layer in the meantime.  Block layer does merge some IOs, but
a lot not, depending on how many tasks are doing swapout concurrently.  In
practice, I've seen a lot of small size IO in swapout workloads.

We makes the cluster allocation per-cpu here.  The interleave disk access
issue goes away.  All tasks swapout to their own cluster, so swapout will
become sequential, which can be easily merged to big size IO.  If one CPU
can't get its per-cpu cluster (for example, there is no free cluster
anymore in the swap), it will fallback to scan swap_map.  The CPU can
still continue swap.  We don't need recycle free swap entries of other
CPUs.

In my test (swap to a 2-disk raid0 partition), this improves around 10%
swapout throughput, and request size is increased significantly.

How does this impact swap readahead is uncertain though.  On one side,
page reclaim always isolates and swaps several adjancent pages, this will
make page reclaim write the pages sequentially and benefit readahead.  On
the other side, several CPU write pages interleave means the pages don't
live _sequentially_ but relatively _near_.  In the per-cpu allocation
case, if adjancent pages are written by different cpus, they will live
relatively _far_.  So how this impacts swap readahead depends on how many
pages page reclaim isolates and swaps one time.  If the number is big,
this patch will benefit swap readahead.  Of course, this is about
sequential access pattern.  The patch has no impact for random access
pattern, because the new cluster allocation algorithm is just for SSD.

Alternative solution is organizing swap layout to be per-mm instead of
this per-cpu approach.  In the per-mm layout, we allocate a disk range for
each mm, so pages of one mm live in swap disk adjacently.  per-mm layout
has potential issues of lock contention if multiple reclaimers are swap
pages from one mm.  For a sequential workload, per-mm layout is better to
implement swap readahead, because pages from the mm are adjacent in disk.
But per-cpu layout isn't very bad in this workload, as page reclaim always
isolates and swaps several pages one time, such pages will still live in
disk sequentially and readahead can utilize this.  For a random workload,
per-mm layout isn't beneficial of request merge, because it's quite
possible pages from different mm are swapout in the meantime and IO can't
be merged in per-mm layout.  while with per-cpu layout we can merge
requests from any mm.  Considering random workload is more popular in
workloads with swap (and per-cpu approach isn't too bad for sequential
workload too), I'm choosing per-cpu layout.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Minchan Kim 
Cc: Kyungmin Park 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Rafael Aquini 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

swap: make swap discard async

2013-09-11T22:57:15+00:00

swap can do cluster discard for SSD, which is good, but there are some
problems here:

1. swap do the discard just before page reclaim gets a swap entry and
   writes the disk sectors.  This is useless for high end SSD, because an
   overwrite to a sector implies a discard to original sector too.  A
   discard + overwrite == overwrite.

2. the purpose of doing discard is to improve SSD firmware garbage
   collection.  Idealy we should send discard as early as possible, so
   firmware can do something smart.  Sending discard just after swap entry
   is freed is considered early compared to sending discard before write.
   Of course, if workload is already bound to gc speed, sending discard
   earlier or later doesn't make

3. block discard is a sync API, which will delay scan_swap_map()
   significantly.

4. Write and discard command can be executed parallel in PCIe SSD.
   Making swap discard async can make execution more efficiently.

This patch makes swap discard async and moves discard to where swap entry
is freed.  Discard and write have no dependence now, so above issues can
be avoided.  Idealy we should do discard for any freed sectors, but some
SSD discard is very slow.  This patch still does discard for a whole
cluster.

My test does a several round of 'mmap, write, unmap', which will trigger a
lot of swap discard.  In a fusionio card, with this patch, the test
runtime is reduced to 18% of the time without it, so around 5.5x faster.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Minchan Kim 
Cc: Kyungmin Park 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Rafael Aquini 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

swap: change block allocation algorithm for SSD