We don't need completion_lock for timeout flushing, don't take it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1e3dc657975ac445b80e7bdc40050db783a5935a.1670002973.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_kill_timeouts() doesn't post any events but queues everything to
task_work. Locking there is needed for protecting linked requests
traversing, we should grab completion_lock directly instead of using
io_cq_[un]lock helpers. Same goes for __io_req_find_next_prep().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/88e75d481a65dc295cb59722bb1cf76402d1c06b.1670002973.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Read cq_timeouts in io_flush_timeouts() only after taking the
timeout_lock, as it's protected by it. There are many places where we
also grab ->completion_lock, but for instance io_timeout_fn() doesn't
and still modifies cq_timeouts.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9c79544dd6cf5c4018cb1bab99cf481a93ea46ef.1670002973.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Remove io_req_tw_post() and io_req_tw_post_queue(), we can use
io_req_task_complete() instead.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9b73c08022c7f1457023ac841f35c0100e70345.1669203009.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Use a more generic io_req_task_complete() in timeout completion
task_work instead of io_req_complete_post().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bda1710b58c07bf06107421c2a65c529ea9cdcac.1669203009.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We removed conditional io_commit_cqring_flush() guarding against
spurious eventfd and the io_disarm_next()'s return value is not used
anymore, just void it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9a441c9a32a58bcc586076fa9a7d0dc33f1fb3cb.1662652536.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We need to make sure (at build time) that struct io_cmd_data is not
casted to a structure that's larger.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c024cdf25ae19fc0319d4180e2298bade8ed17b8.1660201408.git.metze@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_fail_links() is called with ->completion_lock held and for that
reason we'd want to keep it as small as we can. Instead of doing
__io_req_complete_post() for each linked request under the lock, fail
them in a task_work handler under ->uring_lock.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a2f68708b970a21f4e84ddfa7b3abd67a8fffb27.1656153285.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We just use the io_kiocb passed in to find the io_uring_task, and we
already pass in the ctx via cd->ctx anyway.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
/* post CQEs */
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);

We have many places repeating this sequence, and the three function
unlock section is not perfect from the maintainance perspective and also
makes it harder to add new locking/sync trick.

Introduce two helpers. io_cq_lock(), which is simple and only grabs
->completion_lock, and io_cq_unlock_post() encapsulating the three call
section.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fe0c682bf7f7b55d9be55b0d034be9c1949277dc.1655684496.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>